AP® United States History review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/us-history/units/6/6-4)
Unit 6 · Topic 6.4
6.4 The "New South"
Promoters like Henry Grady called for a 'New South' of factories and railroads, and some industry did grow, but the South stayed mostly rural and poor, tied to cotton through sharecropping and debt. After Reconstruction, white Southern leaders built a system of segregation and disfranchisement that the Supreme Court approved in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), while Black Southerners resisted in many ways.
Key terms
- New South
- sharecropping
- Jim Crow
- Plessy v. Ferguson
- poll taxes and literacy tests
- Ida B. Wells
The New South idea
Henry Grady, editor of the Atlanta Constitution, became famous in the 1880s for urging the South to industrialize and attract Northern investment. Some of that happened. Birmingham, Alabama, became a steel and iron center. Textile mills spread across the Carolina Piedmont, and James B. Duke's American Tobacco Company made North Carolina a tobacco powerhouse. Railroad mileage in the South grew quickly.
But Southern industry often depended on low wages, Northern owners and raw materials. Most Southerners, Black and white, still farmed, and per-person income stayed far below the national average. So the 'New South' was more slogan than reality for most people.
Sharecropping and the crop-lien system
Sharecropping began during Reconstruction (5.10). A family farmed a landowner's land and paid with a share of the crop, often a third to half. Tenant farmers rented land and kept more of the crop.
Under the crop-lien system, local merchants sold seed, food and tools on credit, taking a claim (lien) on the coming harvest. High interest and falling cotton prices meant many families ended each year owing more than they earned. They could not leave until the debt was paid, so the system trapped poor white and Black farmers in a cycle close to debt bondage.
Jim Crow and disfranchisement
Jim Crow refers to the laws and customs that segregated Black and white Southerners in railroads, schools, parks and more. In the Civil Rights Cases (1883), the Supreme Court struck down the Civil Rights Act of 1875, ruling that the 14th Amendment limited only state action, not private businesses.
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) began when Homer Plessy deliberately sat in a whites-only rail car to test Louisiana's Separate Car Act. The Court ruled 7–1 that state-required segregation was constitutional as long as facilities were equal, the 'separate but equal' doctrine. In practice, facilities for Black Southerners were almost never equal. Justice John Marshall Harlan's lone dissent argued that the Constitution is color-blind. Plessy stood until Brown v. Board of Education (1954).
Disfranchisement means taking away the right to vote. The 15th Amendment banned denying the vote by race, so Southern states used tools that were race-neutral on paper:
- Poll taxes, a fee to vote that poor people could not afford.
- Literacy tests, judged by white registrars who passed white voters and failed Black ones.
- Grandfather clauses, which exempted men whose grandfathers could vote before 1867, protecting poor white voters.
- White primaries, plus intimidation, fraud and lynching.
Resistance and debate
Black Southerners faced more than unfair laws. White supremacists also leaned on so-called scientific theories of race, which falsely claimed that racial groups had fixed, unequal abilities, to justify segregation and disfranchisement. Black reformers answered in different ways.
Ida B. Wells, a Memphis journalist, investigated lynchings and showed that the common excuse (protecting white women) was usually false; lynching was a tool of terror and economic control. Her pamphlet Southern Horrors (1892) launched a national anti-lynching campaign.
Booker T. Washington, head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, argued in his 1895 Atlanta Compromise speech that Black Southerners should focus on vocational education and economic progress for now, rather than openly challenging segregation. W.E.B. Du Bois later rejected this approach and demanded full civil and political rights immediately (7.4).
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
Applying a court case to evidence
Short-answer practice: Explain how the Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) affected the lives of African Americans in the South.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: State the holding accurately: state-required segregation was legal if facilities were 'separate but equal'.
- Step 2: Give a concrete effect: the decision gave legal cover to Jim Crow laws across public life.
- Step 3: Add evidence that the 'equal' part was ignored, which shows deeper understanding.
Answer: Model answer: In Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that state laws requiring racial segregation did not violate the 14th Amendment as long as facilities were 'separate but equal.' This gave Southern states legal approval to expand Jim Crow laws segregating schools, railroads, hospitals and other public places. Because facilities for Black Southerners were consistently underfunded and inferior, the ruling helped lock African Americans into second-class citizenship until the Court reversed the doctrine for public schools in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.
Common mistakes
- Saying Plessy created segregation. Segregation laws already existed; Plessy upheld them and encouraged more.
- Thinking poll taxes and literacy tests openly mentioned race. They were race-neutral on paper, which is how they slipped past the 15th Amendment.
- Overstating the New South. Industry grew in places, but the region stayed mostly agricultural and poor.
On the exam
- Washington versus Du Bois is a classic comparison. Know each man's strategy and the reasoning behind it.
- Questions may ask how far the New South actually changed the region; strong answers balance real industrial growth against continuing poverty, sharecropping and racial hierarchy.
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself
5 questions on 6.4 The "New South". Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
Source 1: "The old South rested everything on slavery and agriculture, unconscious that these could neither give nor maintain healthy growth. The new South presents a perfect democracy, the oligarchs leading in the popular movement; a social system compact and closely knitted, less splendid on the surface, but stronger at the core; a hundred farms for every plantation, fifty homes for every palace; and a diversified industry that meets the complex needs of this complex age."
Source 2: "But in view of the constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In respect of civil rights, all citizens are equal before the law."
Source 1: Henry W. Grady, editor of the Atlanta Constitution, speech to the New England Society of New York, December 1886. Source 2: Justice John Marshall Harlan, dissenting opinion in Plessy v. Ferguson, 1896.
Grady's speech to a Northern audience was most likely intended to
Which of the following most directly challenges Grady's description of the South?
In Source 2, Harlan argues that the law requiring separate railroad cars for Black and white passengers
Source 1: "To those of my race who depend on bettering their condition in a foreign land, or who underestimate the importance of cultivating friendly relations with the Southern white man, who is their next-door neighbor, I would say: 'Cast down your bucket where you are.' . . . In all things that are purely social we can be as separate as the fingers, yet one as the hand in all things essential to mutual progress."
Source 2: "The lesson this teaches and which every Afro-American should ponder well, is that a Winchester rifle should have a place of honor in every black home, and it should be used for that protection which the law refuses to give."
Source 1: Booker T. Washington, principal of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, speech at the Cotton States and International Exposition, Atlanta, September 1895. Source 2: Ida B. Wells, Black journalist from Memphis, Southern Horrors: Lynch Law in All Its Phases, 1892, written after a Memphis mob lynched three Black grocery owners.
Washington and Wells differed most in that
Both sources were produced in a period when
0 of 5 answered