Skip to main content

Unit 5 · Topic 5.11

5.11 Failure of Reconstruction

Reconstruction ultimately failed to secure equality for Black Southerners. Without land, most freedpeople became sharecroppers trapped in debt; the Ku Klux Klan and other groups used terror to destroy Black political power; Northern support faded; and the Compromise of 1877 ended federal protection. Still, the Reconstruction amendments remained in the Constitution for later generations to use.

Key terms

  • sharecropping
  • Ku Klux Klan
  • Redeemers
  • Compromise of 1877
  • Rutherford B. Hayes

Sharecropping and the crop-lien system

Most freedpeople wanted land, but there was no large-scale land redistribution. Planters had land but little cash; freedpeople had labor but no land. Sharecropping emerged as the result. A landowner provided land, a cabin, tools and seed, and in return the sharecropper family gave the owner a share of the crop, often half.

Sharecroppers usually had to buy food and supplies on credit from local merchants under the crop-lien system, in which the merchant took a claim on the future crop. With high interest and falling cotton prices, many families ended each year owing more than they had earned and were legally bound to stay. Sharecropping gave Black families more control over their daily work than gang labor under slavery, but it trapped many white and Black Southerners in poverty for generations.

Terror and violence

The Ku Klux Klan, founded in Tennessee in 1865–1866 by Confederate veterans, used whippings, arson and murder to intimidate Black voters, officeholders, teachers and their white Republican allies. Congress passed the Enforcement Acts (1870–1871), including the Ku Klux Klan Act, and President Grant used federal troops and prosecutions to break the Klan in parts of the South.

But other groups, such as the White League in Louisiana and the Red Shirts in South Carolina, carried on the violence more openly. In the Colfax Massacre in Louisiana (1873), a white militia killed dozens of Black men, many after they surrendered. In United States v. Cruikshank (1876), which arose from Colfax, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment restricted states, not private individuals, making it much harder for the federal government to prosecute such violence. In the Slaughterhouse Cases (1873), the Court had already read the amendment's protections narrowly.

The North retreats

As federal support faded, white Democrats calling themselves Redeemers took back Southern state governments one by one, often through fraud and violence. By 1876 Republicans held power only in South Carolina, Louisiana and Florida.

  • Economic depression: the Panic of 1873 turned Northern attention to jobs and money.
  • Scandal: corruption in Grant's administration, such as the Whiskey Ring, made many voters cynical about federal power.
  • Racism and fatigue: many white Northerners had never supported racial equality and grew tired of the 'Southern question'.
  • Politics: Democrats won control of the House in 1874, and the Civil Rights Act of 1875, which banned discrimination in public accommodations, was rarely enforced and was struck down in 1883.

The election of 1876 and the Compromise of 1877

In 1876 Democrat Samuel Tilden won the popular vote but was one electoral vote short of a majority. Republican Rutherford B. Hayes needed all 20 disputed electoral votes, from Florida, Louisiana, South Carolina and one from Oregon. A special electoral commission voted 8–7 along party lines to give them all to Hayes.

In the informal Compromise of 1877, Southern Democrats accepted Hayes as president. In return, Hayes withdrew federal troops from the statehouses of South Carolina and Louisiana, ending federal support for the last Republican governments in the South, and promised support for Southern economic development. Reconstruction was over.

Judging Reconstruction

Historians' views have changed sharply. In the early 1900s the 'Dunning School' portrayed Reconstruction as a corrupt disaster forced on the South, a view that helped justify Jim Crow. W. E. B. Du Bois challenged it in Black Reconstruction in America (1935), and since the 1960s most historians, such as Eric Foner, have described Reconstruction as an unfinished revolution: a real, if brief, experiment in interracial democracy that was defeated by violence and Northern retreat.

Its lasting achievements were the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, Black churches, schools and colleges, and the example of Black political participation. Civil rights activists in the 1950s and 1960s used those amendments in what some called a 'Second Reconstruction'.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Ranking causes of failure

    Write a thesis for this prompt: Evaluate the relative importance of the reasons Reconstruction failed to secure equal rights for African Americans.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Identify at least two causes: violence, economic dependence, Northern retreat, court decisions.
    2. Step 2: Rank them.
    3. Step 3: Give a reason for the ranking.

    Answer: Model thesis: Although economic dependence through sharecropping and narrow Supreme Court rulings such as United States v. Cruikshank weakened freedpeople's position, the most important reason Reconstruction failed to secure equal rights was the North's loss of political will, because white Southern violence by groups like the Ku Klux Klan and the White League could only succeed once Northern voters and leaders, distracted by the Panic of 1873 and unwilling to keep troops in the South, abandoned federal enforcement in the Compromise of 1877.

Common mistakes

  • Saying federal troops left the entire South in 1877. Hayes withdrew them from the statehouses, ending support for the last Republican governments.
  • Describing sharecropping as the same as slavery. It was a different, exploitative system that kept many in debt, but families had more control over their work and lives.
  • Calling Reconstruction a total failure. The amendments, schools and churches it produced lasted and later became the basis for civil rights victories.

On the exam

  • The 'extent of success' of Reconstruction is a classic essay question. A strong thesis acknowledges both its achievements and its failures.
  • Expect secondary-source questions contrasting historians' interpretations of Reconstruction.

Connected topics

Videos

  • Why RECONSTRUCTION Failed [APUSH Review]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Failure of Reconstruction | AP US History | Khan Academy

    Khan AcademyWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • #53 - APUSH 5.11 Failure of Reconstruction [UPDATED]

    APUSH SlidesWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Failure of Reconstruction in Under 3 mins (APUSH Unit 5 Topic 11) 5.11

    Maximum InsightWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 5.11 Failure of Reconstruction. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Question 1 of 4

Supreme Court decisions of the 1870s, such as the Slaughterhouse Cases and United States v. Cruikshank, affected Reconstruction mainly by

"Section 1. . . . all freedmen, free Negroes, and mulattoes may sue and be sued . . . and may acquire personal property . . . Provided, that the provisions of this section shall not be construed as to allow any freedman, free Negro, or mulatto to rent or lease any lands or tenements, except in incorporated towns or cities . . . .

Section 7. Be it further enacted, that every civil officer shall, and every person may, arrest and carry back to his or her legal employer any freedman, free Negro, or mulatto who shall have quit the service of his or her employer before the expiration of his or her term of service without good cause . . . ."

Source: Mississippi state legislature, An Act to Confer Civil Rights on Freedmen, November 1865.

Question 2 of 4

The restriction in Section 1 on renting land helps explain why many freedpeople later

Historian 1: Reconstruction was overthrown from within the South. Across the region, the Ku Klux Klan and later armed groups like the White League and the Red Shirts assassinated Black officeholders, broke up Republican meetings and drove voters from the polls. Federal enforcement crushed the first Klan for a time, but as federal prosecutions and troop numbers dwindled, terror campaigns in the mid-1870s let Democrats, calling themselves Redeemers, take back one state government after another.

Historian 2: Reconstruction ended because the North gave up on it. After the Panic of 1873, Northern voters cared more about jobs and money than about the rights of Black Southerners, and Democrats won control of the House in 1874. Many Republicans came to see federal intervention in the South as costly and corrupt. By the time of the disputed 1876 election, party leaders were willing to trade away the last federal protection for the presidency.

Source: Passages written for this practice set, summarizing interpretations found in historians' work on Reconstruction.

Question 3 of 4

Which of the following would best support Historian 2's argument?

Question 4 of 4

Despite the end of Reconstruction described in both passages, which of the following was a lasting legacy of the period?

0 of 4 answered