AP® United States History review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/us-history/units/6/6-3)
Unit 6 · Topic 6.3
6.3 Westward Expansion: Social and Cultural Development
As railroads, miners and settlers pushed onto the Plains and into the West, the U.S. government broke treaties, destroyed the buffalo-based economy, fought wars against American Indian nations and confined them to reservations. Policies like the Dawes Act and boarding schools then tried to erase Native cultures, while many Native people resisted and adapted.
Key terms
- reservations
- Battle of the Little Bighorn
- Wounded Knee
- Dawes Act
- assimilation
- boarding schools
Collision on the Plains
Plains nations such as the Lakota (Sioux), Cheyenne, Comanche and Kiowa had built economies around the horse and the buffalo. Millions of buffalo still roamed the Plains after the Civil War. Hide hunters, railroad crews and sport shooters killed them by the millions in the 1870s and 1880s, and the U.S. Army encouraged it because it weakened Native resistance. By the late 1880s only about a thousand remained.
In 1871 Congress stopped making treaties with Native nations and began treating them as wards of the government. Federal policy aimed to confine Native peoples to reservations, smaller areas of land set aside for them, often on land settlers did not want yet.
Wars and broken promises
- Fort Laramie Treaty (1868): the U.S. promised the Lakota the Black Hills. After gold was found there in 1874, miners rushed in and the government tried to force a sale.
- Battle of the Little Bighorn (June 1876): Lakota and Cheyenne warriors, with leaders including Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse, wiped out Lt. Col. George Custer's command in Montana. It was a major Native victory, but the army answered with an overwhelming campaign, and most Lakota were forced onto reservations within about a year.
- Nez Perce (1877): Chief Joseph led his people on a long retreat toward Canada before surrendering in Montana.
- Apache resistance in the Southwest continued until Geronimo surrendered in 1886.
- Wounded Knee (December 29, 1890): the Ghost Dance, a religious movement promising renewal of the old world, alarmed federal agents. Two weeks after reservation police killed Sitting Bull during an attempted arrest, soldiers of the 7th Cavalry killed somewhere between about 150 and 300 Lakota men, women and children at Wounded Knee Creek, South Dakota. It is usually seen as the end of large-scale armed resistance.
Forced assimilation
Assimilation means absorbing a group into the dominant culture. Many white reformers sincerely believed they were helping Native people by making them into Christian, English-speaking individual farmers. Helen Hunt Jackson's book A Century of Dishonor (1881) exposed broken treaties and pushed reform, but most reformers still rejected Native cultures.
The Dawes Act of 1887 broke up reservation land into individual allotments, usually 160 acres for the head of a family. Land left over after allotment was declared 'surplus' and sold to settlers. Native Americans who accepted allotments and gave up tribal ways could become U.S. citizens. The result was disastrous: Native landholdings fell from about 138 million acres in 1887 to about 48 million by 1934, when the policy ended.
Boarding schools such as the Carlisle Indian Industrial School in Pennsylvania (founded 1879 by Richard Henry Pratt) took children far from home, cut their hair, banned Native languages and taught Christianity and trades.
Survival and other Western peoples
Native people resisted in many ways besides war. Families hid children from school officials, kept ceremonies alive in secret, and used English and the courts to defend their land. Some nations also found new ways to support themselves on reservations, such as raising cattle and sheep, selling crafts or leasing grazing land. Many cultures survived despite policies meant to end them.
The West was also home to Mexican Americans in the Southwest, whose land claims were often ignored after 1848. As Anglo ranchers and railroads moved in, fights over land turned violent; in New Mexico in 1889–1890, Hispano farmers known as Las Gorras Blancas (the White Caps) cut fences and tore up rail ties to defend shared grazing lands. The West was also home to Chinese immigrants and Black 'Exodusters' who moved to Kansas around 1879. Historians now describe the West as a meeting place of many peoples, not an empty frontier.
In 1893 historian Frederick Jackson Turner argued that the frontier, declared closed by the 1890 census, had shaped American democracy and individualism. Later historians criticized his thesis for ignoring Native Americans and others already living there.
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
Explaining a policy's purpose and effect
Short-answer practice: Briefly explain one way the Dawes Act (1887) affected American Indians.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: State what the act did in one clause so the reader knows you understand it.
- Step 2: Give a specific effect with evidence, such as the land loss.
- Step 3: Explain why that effect happened.
Answer: Model answer: The Dawes Act divided reservation land into individual family plots and allowed the government to sell the remaining 'surplus' land to white settlers. As a result, American Indians lost most of their land, with Native holdings shrinking from about 138 million acres in 1887 to about 48 million by 1934. Because the act treated land as individual property instead of shared tribal territory, it also weakened tribal governments and communal ways of life, which was part of its assimilationist goal.
Common mistakes
- Treating Little Bighorn as the end of Native resistance. It was a Native victory; Wounded Knee (1890) is the usual endpoint.
- Describing the Dawes Act as protecting Native land. It did the opposite, opening millions of acres to settlers.
- Calling all reformers villains or heroes. Many were sincere 'friends of the Indian' whose assimilation goals still destroyed cultures; explain both their motives and the results.
On the exam
- Questions often ask you to explain the shift from removal and reservations to assimilation, or to compare Dawes-era policy with Indian Removal in the 1830s (4.8).
- Sources might include a Carlisle 'before and after' photograph or a Native leader's speech. Be ready to describe purpose, audience and point of view.
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself
4 questions on 6.3 Westward Expansion: Social and Cultural Development. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
"A great general has said that the only good Indian is a dead one, and that high sanction of his destruction has been an enormous factor in promoting Indian massacres. In a sense, I agree with the sentiment, but only in this: that all the Indian there is in the race should be dead. Kill the Indian in him, and save the man."
Source: Captain Richard Henry Pratt, founder of the Carlisle Indian Industrial School, speech to the National Conference of Charities and Correction, Denver, 1892.
Pratt's statement best reflects which approach to federal Indian policy in the late 1800s?
Which federal law shared the goals expressed by Pratt?
"I have heard talk and talk, but nothing is done. Good words do not last long unless they amount to something. . . . The earth is the mother of all people, and all people should have equal rights upon it. You might as well expect the rivers to run backward as that any man who was born a free man should be contented when penned up and denied liberty to go where he pleases. . . .
Let me be a free man, free to travel, free to stop, free to work, free to trade where I choose, free to choose my own teachers, free to follow the religion of my fathers, free to talk, think and act for myself—and I will obey every law or submit to the penalty."
Source: Chief Joseph, leader of a band of the Nez Perce who fought the U.S. Army while fleeing toward Canada in 1877, "An Indian's View of Indian Affairs," North American Review, April 1879.
Joseph's complaint about being "penned up and denied liberty to go where he pleases" most directly reflects
Joseph's call to be "free to choose my own teachers" and "free to follow the religion of my fathers" most directly conflicts with which later federal policy?
0 of 4 answered