AP® English Literature and Composition review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/lit/units/7/7-7)
Unit 7 · Topic 7.7
7.7 Arguments with depth: context, other readings and revision
Strong arguments go past the obvious reading. You can show depth by placing your interpretation in a broader context, weighing other reasonable readings, or using an analogy that sheds light on the text. You should also be ready to revise your thesis when the evidence doesn't support it.
Key terms
- sophistication
- broader context
- alternative interpretation
- analogy
- revision
- line of reasoning
What sophistication looks like
The AP Lit essay rubric has one point for sophistication of thought or a complex understanding. You can't earn it with a single phrase or a fancy word. It has to run through your argument. The rubric names the first four routes below, and the course framework adds a fifth: a well-chosen analogy.
- Exploring tensions in the text, such as a character who is both admirable and cruel.
- Placing your interpretation in a broader context, such as the period's social rules or a larger human question the text raises.
- Accounting for other interpretations, then explaining why yours holds up or how both can be true.
- Writing in a style that is consistently vivid and persuasive.
- Using an analogy that clarifies your reading, not one that just decorates it.
Broader context, used well
Context means connecting the text to something larger: the time it was written, a social issue, or a lasting human problem. Use it to explain the text, not to replace it. "In the 1890s, women had few rights" is a history fact. "Louise's joy at being free of a kind husband suggests that the problem isn't one bad man but marriage itself, as her society arranged it" uses context to deepen a reading.
Keep context claims modest and accurate. You don't need dates or statistics; you need a sound connection.
Alternative readings
Acknowledging another reading shows you understand the text's complexity. Use a simple structure: state the other reading fairly, show what it gets right, then explain what it misses or how your reading includes it.
Don't fake this with a straw man, a weak version of another view that's easy to knock down. AP readers can tell.
Analogies that shed light
An apt analogy compares the situation in the text to something else in a way that makes your reading clearer. For example: "Louise's hour alone works like a held breath: everything in her life pauses while she imagines it differently, and the door opening forces the breath out." The analogy explains the story's pacing and its ending at once. If an analogy doesn't make the text clearer, leave it out.
Revising when the evidence pushes back
Your first thesis is a guess. As you reread and gather evidence, you'll often find details that don't fit. Don't hide them. Revise the thesis so it accounts for them. A thesis that has been tested against inconvenient evidence is almost always more interesting.
On a timed essay, this happens in your planning minutes. Spend a few minutes listing evidence before you commit to a thesis, and adjust the thesis to fit what you found.
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
Revising a thesis toward sophistication
First-draft thesis (written for this practice set) about "The Story of an Hour": Mrs. Mallard dies of happiness when she sees her husband is alive. Use the ending, "When the doctors came they said she had died of heart disease — of the joy that kills," and the earlier line "And yet she had loved him — sometimes," to revise it.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: Test the draft against the evidence. The doctors say joy killed her, but the reader saw her joy come from believing she was free. Her husband's return means losing that freedom, not gaining happiness.
- Step 2: Notice the irony: the doctors' confident verdict is exactly wrong, and they are part of the society that assumes a wife must be overjoyed to have her husband back.
- Step 3: Account for an alternative reading: some readers find Louise's joy selfish. The line "she had loved him — sometimes" shows the story isn't condemning her husband; it suggests that even a loving marriage can be a cage.
- Step 4: Revise the thesis to include the irony and the broader context.
Answer: Revised thesis: Chopin ends with the doctors' confident diagnosis of "the joy that kills" to expose how badly her society misreads women: what kills Louise is not joy at her husband's return but the sudden loss of a freedom no one around her could imagine she wanted. Because Louise admits she had loved her husband "sometimes," the story's target is not one cruel man but the way marriage itself, even a kind one, denies a woman a life of her own. (This version handles the irony, answers the "selfish" reading, and places the story in a broader context.)
Common mistakes
- Tacking a sentence of history or "this is still relevant today" onto the end of an essay. Context has to be developed and tied to the text.
- Mentioning an alternative reading in one sentence and dropping it. Develop it or leave it out.
- Holding on to a first thesis that the evidence contradicts. Revise it during planning.
On the exam
- Sophistication is worth 1 point out of 6 on each essay, and it's usually the hardest. Don't chase it at the expense of the evidence-and-commentary row, which is worth up to 4.
- Multiple-choice questions in this skill may ask which claim a passage best supports or how a writer should revise a claim to fit the evidence. Pick the claim that the details support most fully, not the most dramatic one.
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself
4 questions on 7.7 Arguments with depth: context, other readings and revision. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
Sherwood Anderson, "Hands," Winesburg, Ohio (1919)
Which claim about Wing Biddlebaum is best supported by the passage?
Ambrose Bierce, "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge" (1890), Part I
Which interpretation of paragraphs 4–7 is best supported by the passage?
Stephen Crane, "The Open Boat" (1897), the opening of Part I, from The Open Boat and Other Stories (1898)
The narrator’s remark in paragraph 11 that “Viewed from a balcony, the whole thing would doubtlessly have been weirdly picturesque” supports which interpretation?
James Joyce, "The Dead," Dubliners (1914), the story's final paragraphs
The sentence “The time had come for him to set out on his journey westward” (paragraph 4) can reasonably be read in more than one way. Which pair of readings does the passage best support?
0 of 4 answered