AP® English Literature and Composition review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/lit/units/6/6-3)
Unit 6 · Topic 6.3
6.3 Contrasts that create ambiguity
When a text puts two things side by side that don't fit, like two characters, two places or a character's words and actions, the contrast is usually deliberate. These contrasts create nuance and ambiguity: they make a single, simple reading harder to hold. Your job is to explain the tension, not to explain it away.
Key terms
- contrast
- ambiguity
- nuance
- contradiction
- complexity
Contrast, nuance and ambiguity
A contrast is a difference that the text makes noticeable. Nuance means fine shades of meaning, the opposite of black and white. Ambiguity means a detail or situation supports more than one reasonable reading.
Contrasts create both. When a character speaks like a saint and acts like a villain, you can't simply label them. When a peaceful scene sits next to a violent one, each colors how you read the other. Strong readers treat these clashes as clues to the work's complexity.
Where to look
- A character's words against their actions, or their public face against their private thoughts.
- Two characters in the same situation who respond differently (see foils in 6.1).
- Two settings, like a city and the country, or a home and a place of exile.
- The narrator's judgment against what the events actually show.
- The beginning of a work against its end.
Frankenstein: who is the monster?
Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1818) is built on a contrast that never resolves. Victor Frankenstein, the educated scientist, abandons the being he made the moment it comes to life. The creature teaches himself to read, studies books like Paradise Lost, and speaks with real eloquence. He also murders Victor's young brother, William.
When the two finally meet, the creature argues his case: "I was benevolent and good; misery made me a fiend." Victor answers with insults. The creature's beautiful speech sits right next to his crimes, and Victor's cruelty sits next to his suffering. The novel never tells you which of them deserves more blame. That ambiguity is a large part of why it still gets argued about.
More contrasts that resist easy answers
Once you start looking, these clashes are everywhere in longer works. Each one below keeps readers from settling on a single, simple judgment.
| Work | The contrast | The question it raises |
|---|---|---|
| A Doll's House (Ibsen) | Nora's playful, childish manner vs. the secret loan she took out to save her husband's life | Is Nora the silly wife Torvald thinks she is, or the strongest person in the house? |
| The Great Gatsby (Fitzgerald) | Gatsby's huge, crowded parties vs. Gatsby standing alone, apart from his guests | Is Gatsby a social success or a deeply lonely man? |
| Great Expectations (Dickens) | Wemmick's cold manner at the law office vs. his warmth at home with his father | Which one is the real Wemmick, and what does the city do to people? |
How to handle a contradiction in your writing
Don't pick one side of the contradiction and ignore the other. Name both, then explain what the tension shows. Useful sentence frames help: "Although X, Y, which suggests…" or "The contrast between X and Y complicates…"
Explaining a tension like this is one of the clearest ways to show sophistication, because you're working with the text's complexity instead of flattening it.
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
Writing about a contrast without resolving it too fast
A student reads the creature's line, "I was benevolent and good; misery made me a fiend," and writes: "The creature is evil because he kills William." Explain what this reading misses, and write a stronger claim.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: Notice the contrast the student ignored: the creature speaks thoughtfully and blames his violence on how he was treated.
- Step 2: Check the word choice. "Benevolent and good" describes his past; "fiend" describes what he became. The sentence is about change caused by misery.
- Step 3: Don't swing to the opposite extreme ("the creature is innocent"). He did commit murder.
- Step 4: Write a claim that holds both sides and says what the tension suggests.
Answer: Stronger claim: Shelley pairs the creature's moving self-defense with his crimes so that readers can neither excuse him nor dismiss him. His line "misery made me a fiend" blames his violence on the cruelty he met, which shifts some guilt onto Victor and the people who rejected him, but the murders keep that guilt from shifting entirely. The contrast makes the novel ask whether monstrousness is born or made.
Common mistakes
- Treating a contradiction as a mistake by the author. Assume it's deliberate and ask what it does.
- Resolving ambiguity too quickly by choosing one reading and ignoring evidence for the other.
- Saying a text "is ambiguous" without naming the two readings it supports.
On the exam
- When a multiple-choice question asks about the effect of side-by-side details, first name the two things being contrasted. Then pick the answer that explains what the contrast does, not one that just restates the details.
- In essays, a sentence that explains a tension ("Although…, …") is a natural route to the sophistication point, if you develop it rather than mention it once.
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself
4 questions on 6.3 Contrasts that create ambiguity. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
Henrik Ibsen, A Doll's House, Act I (1879), translated by R. Farquharson Sharp (1910)
A careful reader of Nora’s account of the trip to Italy (paragraphs 9–19) is most likely to notice which tension?
Which claim about the passage is best supported?
Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness (1899; in book form 1902), the opening. Two excerpts: three paragraphs describing the sunset and the river’s history are left out between paragraphs 3 and 4.
Paragraph 2 contrasts the “luminous space” of the estuary with air “condensed into a mournful gloom, brooding motionless over the biggest, and the greatest, town on earth.” This contrast chiefly
Marlow’s remark “And this also… has been one of the dark places of the earth” (paragraph 5) is surprising chiefly because it
0 of 4 answered