Skip to main content

Unit 6 · Topic 6.2

6.2 Breaking the timeline: flashback and foreshadowing

Writers don't have to tell events in the order they happened. Flashbacks, foreshadowing, starting in the middle of the action and stream of consciousness all break up the timeline. Each one changes what you know and when you know it, which is how a writer builds anticipation, suspense and tension.

Key terms

  • flashback
  • foreshadowing
  • in medias res
  • stream of consciousness
  • suspense

Four ways to break the timeline

Chronological order tells events as they happened. Many novels and plays break that order on purpose. The four techniques below show up most often.

TechniqueWhat it doesTypical effect
FlashbackJumps back to events before the main storyExplains a character's past or reveals a cause late
ForeshadowingHints at what will happen laterBuilds anticipation and a sense of dread or fate
In medias res (Latin for in the middle of things)Opens partway through the actionCreates questions the reader wants answered
Stream of consciousnessFollows a character's thoughts as they drift and jumpMixes past and present the way memory does

Suspense about how and why, not only what

When a story reveals the ending early, you might think the suspense is gone. Usually it just moves. Instead of asking what will happen, you ask how it happened and why.

Edith Wharton's Ethan Frome (1911) works this way. An unnamed narrator arrives in the village of Starkfield and sees Ethan, a man who looks old though he isn't, with a red gash across his forehead and a warped right side. A local tells him it comes from a "smash-up" that happened "twenty-four years ago come next February." Only after this frame does the novel go back in time to tell the winter that led to the accident. You read the whole love story already knowing it ends badly, so every hopeful moment feels fragile.

The narrator also says something useful for any reader: "I had the sense that the deeper meaning of the story was in the gaps." Out-of-order structure leaves gaps on purpose, and filling them is part of how you build an interpretation.

Frames and nested stories

A frame story is an outer story that contains an inner one. Emily Brontë's Wuthering Heights opens in 1801 with a newcomer, Lockwood, visiting his landlord, Heathcliff. Most of the novel is then a long flashback told to Lockwood by the housekeeper, Nelly Dean. Mary Shelley's Frankenstein opens with letters from an explorer, Robert Walton, who meets Victor near the end of Victor's story. In both books the frame makes you wonder how the characters got where they are.

Stream of consciousness is most closely tied to modernist novels like Virginia Woolf's Mrs. Dalloway (1925) and James Joyce's Ulysses (1922). In Mrs. Dalloway, a single walk across London pulls in memories from decades earlier, so the past keeps breaking into the present.

Questions to ask

  • What do I know now that the characters don't yet know?
  • What question does the opening make me want answered?
  • Why does this flashback come here, and not earlier or later?
  • Which details look like hints once I know the ending?

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Explaining the effect of an opening frame

    In Ethan Frome, the narrator first meets Ethan more than twenty years after the accident, and a local says Ethan has "been in Starkfield too many winters." Explain how starting with this frame shapes the reader's experience of the main story.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Identify the structure: the novel opens after the main events, then returns to the past. That is a frame plus a long flashback.
    2. Step 2: Say what the reader knows early: Ethan survives, but he is badly injured and still stuck in Starkfield.
    3. Step 3: Say what the reader doesn't know: what the smash-up was, and how Ethan came to it.
    4. Step 4: Name the effect: suspense shifts from whether disaster comes to how and why it comes. The local's remark about winters also links Ethan's damage to the place itself.

    Answer: Sample answer: By opening years after the accident, Wharton removes the question of whether disaster will strike and puts dread in its place. You read Ethan's hopes for a different life already knowing they fail, so even happy scenes carry a sense of doom. The line about "too many winters" suggests that the cold, isolated town, not one bad night, is what wore Ethan down, which pushes you to read the setting as part of the cause.

Common mistakes

  • Naming the technique without its effect. "The author uses a flashback" earns nothing until you explain what the flashback reveals or how it changes your reading.
  • Treating any mention of the past as a flashback. A flashback actually shifts the story's present to an earlier scene; a character simply remembering in a sentence or two is a memory, not a flashback.
  • Thinking an early reveal kills suspense. Usually it moves the suspense from what to how and why.

On the exam

  • Multiple-choice questions often ask about the function of a paragraph that interrupts the timeline, for example what a flashback reveals about a character's motives. Ask what the reader learns and why the writer placed it there.
  • In the prose fiction essay, structure is a strong choice to analyze when a passage moves between time periods. Track each shift and explain what it adds.

Connected topics

Videos

  • "What is a Flashback?": A Literary Guide for English Students and Teachers

    OSU School of Writing, Literature and FilmWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Learn Flashback and Foreshadow Using TV and Movie Clips

    ELA Through FilmWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • "What is Foreshadowing?": A Literary Guide for English Students and Teachers

    OSU School of Writing, Literature and FilmWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Flashback and Foreshadowing

    Jennifer LewisWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • "What is Stream of Consciousness?": A Literary Guide for English Students and Teachers

    OSU School of Writing, Literature and FilmWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

2 questions on 6.2 Breaking the timeline: flashback and foreshadowing. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Paragraph 1
The Nellie, a cruising yawl, swung to her anchor without a flutter of the sails, and was at rest. The flood had made, the wind was nearly calm, and being bound down the river, the only thing for it was to come to and wait for the turn of the tide.
Paragraph 2
The sea-reach of the Thames stretched before us like the beginning of an interminable waterway. In the offing the sea and the sky were welded together without a joint, and in the luminous space the tanned sails of the barges drifting up with the tide seemed to stand still in red clusters of canvas sharply peaked, with gleams of varnished sprits. A haze rested on the low shores that ran out to sea in vanishing flatness. The air was dark above Gravesend, and farther back still seemed condensed into a mournful gloom, brooding motionless over the biggest, and the greatest, town on earth.
Paragraph 3
The Director of Companies was our captain and our host. We four affectionately watched his back as he stood in the bows looking to seaward. On the whole river there was nothing that looked half so nautical. He resembled a pilot, which to a seaman is trustworthiness personified. It was difficult to realize his work was not out there in the luminous estuary, but behind him, within the brooding gloom.
Paragraph 4
The sun set; the dusk fell on the stream, and lights began to appear along the shore. The Chapman light-house, a three-legged thing erect on a mud-flat, shone strongly. Lights of ships moved in the fairway—a great stir of lights going up and going down. And farther west on the upper reaches the place of the monstrous town was still marked ominously on the sky, a brooding gloom in sunshine, a lurid glare under the stars.
Paragraph 5
“And this also,” said Marlow suddenly, “has been one of the dark places of the earth.”
Paragraph 6
He was the only man of us who still “followed the sea.” The worst that could be said of him was that he did not represent his class. He was a seaman, but he was a wanderer, too, while most seamen lead, if one may so express it, a sedentary life. Their minds are of the stay-at-home order, and their home is always with them—the ship; and so is their country—the sea. One ship is very much like another, and the sea is always the same. In the immutability of their surroundings the foreign shores, the foreign faces, the changing immensity of life, glide past, veiled not by a sense of mystery but by a slightly disdainful ignorance; for there is nothing mysterious to a seaman unless it be the sea itself, which is the mistress of his existence and as inscrutable as Destiny. For the rest, after his hours of work, a casual stroll or a casual spree on shore suffices to unfold for him the secret of a whole continent, and generally he finds the secret not worth knowing. The yarns of seamen have a direct simplicity, the whole meaning of which lies within the shell of a cracked nut. But Marlow was not typical (if his propensity to spin yarns be excepted), and to him the meaning of an episode was not inside like a kernel but outside, enveloping the tale which brought it out only as a glow brings out a haze, in the likeness of one of these misty halos that sometimes are made visible by the spectral illumination of moonshine.

Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness (1899; in book form 1902), the opening. Two excerpts: three paragraphs describing the sunset and the river’s history are left out between paragraphs 3 and 4.

Question 1 of 2

The passage sets up the novel’s structure chiefly by

Paragraph 1
Miss Brooke had that kind of beauty which seems to be thrown into relief by poor dress. Her hand and wrist were so finely formed that she could wear sleeves not less bare of style than those in which the Blessed Virgin appeared to Italian painters; and her profile as well as her stature and bearing seemed to gain the more dignity from her plain garments, which by the side of provincial fashion gave her the impressiveness of a fine quotation from the Bible,—or from one of our elder poets,—in a paragraph of to-day’s newspaper. She was usually spoken of as being remarkably clever, but with the addition that her sister Celia had more common-sense. Nevertheless, Celia wore scarcely more trimmings; and it was only to close observers that her dress differed from her sister’s, and had a shade of coquetry in its arrangements; for Miss Brooke’s plain dressing was due to mixed conditions, in most of which her sister shared. The pride of being ladies had something to do with it: the Brooke connections, though not exactly aristocratic, were unquestionably “good:” if you inquired backward for a generation or two, you would not find any yard-measuring or parcel-tying forefathers—anything lower than an admiral or a clergyman; and there was even an ancestor discernible as a Puritan gentleman who served under Cromwell, but afterwards conformed, and managed to come out of all political troubles as the proprietor of a respectable family estate. Young women of such birth, living in a quiet country-house, and attending a village church hardly larger than a parlor, naturally regarded frippery as the ambition of a huckster’s daughter. Then there was well-bred economy, which in those days made show in dress the first item to be deducted from, when any margin was required for expenses more distinctive of rank. Such reasons would have been enough to account for plain dress, quite apart from religious feeling; but in Miss Brooke’s case, religion alone would have determined it; and Celia mildly acquiesced in all her sister’s sentiments, only infusing them with that common-sense which is able to accept momentous doctrines without any eccentric agitation. Dorothea knew many passages of Pascal’s Pensees and of Jeremy Taylor by heart; and to her the destinies of mankind, seen by the light of Christianity, made the solicitudes of feminine fashion appear an occupation for Bedlam. She could not reconcile the anxieties of a spiritual life involving eternal consequences, with a keen interest in gimp and artificial protrusions of drapery. Her mind was theoretic, and yearned by its nature after some lofty conception of the world which might frankly include the parish of Tipton and her own rule of conduct there; she was enamoured of intensity and greatness, and rash in embracing whatever seemed to her to have those aspects; likely to seek martyrdom, to make retractations, and then to incur martyrdom after all in a quarter where she had not sought it. Certainly such elements in the character of a marriageable girl tended to interfere with her lot, and hinder it from being decided according to custom, by good looks, vanity, and merely canine affection. With all this, she, the elder of the sisters, was not yet twenty, and they had both been educated, since they were about twelve years old and had lost their parents, on plans at once narrow and promiscuous, first in an English family and afterwards in a Swiss family at Lausanne, their bachelor uncle and guardian trying in this way to remedy the disadvantages of their orphaned condition.
Paragraph 2
And how should Dorothea not marry?—a girl so handsome and with such prospects? Nothing could hinder it but her love of extremes, and her insistence on regulating life according to notions which might cause a wary man to hesitate before he made her an offer, or even might lead her at last to refuse all offers. A young lady of some birth and fortune, who knelt suddenly down on a brick floor by the side of a sick laborer and prayed fervidly as if she thought herself living in the time of the Apostles—who had strange whims of fasting like a Papist, and of sitting up at night to read old theological books! Such a wife might awaken you some fine morning with a new scheme for the application of her income which would interfere with political economy and the keeping of saddle-horses: a man would naturally think twice before he risked himself in such fellowship. Women were expected to have weak opinions; but the great safeguard of society and of domestic life was, that opinions were not acted on. Sane people did what their neighbors did, so that if any lunatics were at large, one might know and avoid them.
Paragraph 3
The rural opinion about the new young ladies, even among the cottagers, was generally in favor of Celia, as being so amiable and innocent-looking, while Miss Brooke’s large eyes seemed, like her religion, too unusual and striking. Poor Dorothea! compared with her, the innocent-looking Celia was knowing and worldly-wise; so much subtler is a human mind than the outside tissues which make a sort of blazonry or clock-face for it.

George Eliot, Middlemarch, Chapter 1 (1871–72). The chapter's first paragraph (paragraph 1) and, after two paragraphs about the sisters' uncle are left out, paragraphs 2–3.

Question 2 of 2

The narrator’s description of Dorothea as “likely to seek martyrdom, to make retractations, and then to incur martyrdom after all in a quarter where she had not sought it” (paragraph 1) suggests that

0 of 2 answered