Skip to main content

Unit 6 · Topic 6.3

6.3 Position versus perspective

A position is what someone thinks about an issue. A perspective is where they're coming from: their job, background, interests or expertise. Two people can hold the same position for very different reasons, and noticing those differences makes your synthesis smarter and more convincing.

Key terms

  • position
  • perspective
  • stakeholder
  • background
  • interests

Two different questions

Ask two separate questions about every source. "What does this person think?" gives you their position: for, against, or somewhere in between. "Why would someone in their situation think that?" gives you their perspective.

For example, a doctor, a coach and a parent might all support later school start times. The doctor's perspective is medical (teenagers' sleep cycles shift later). The coach's is practical (rested athletes get hurt less). The parent's is personal (mornings at home are less stressful). Same position, three perspectives.

The reverse happens too. Two economists with the same training can reach opposite positions on a tax, because they weigh the evidence differently.

Where perspective comes from

On the synthesis essay, the short introduction above each source usually tells you the author's job or organization, which is your first clue to perspective. The source's examples are the second clue: people tend to reach for evidence from their own world.

  • Expertise: what the person has studied or done for a living.
  • Interests: what the person stands to gain or lose. A stakeholder is anyone affected by the decision.
  • Background: where the person lives, their experiences, their community or generation.
  • Role: whether they're speaking as a parent, an official, a business owner or a student.

Why perspective matters in your argument

Naming perspectives lets you do more than count supporters. If people with very different interests reach the same position, that agreement is strong evidence: it suggests the position isn't just one group's self-interest. You can say so directly in your commentary.

Perspectives also help you treat opposing views fairly. Explaining why a reasonable person in a certain role might disagree with you is more persuasive than pretending opponents have no reasons. This kind of thinking can help you earn the sophistication point, because the rubric rewards essays that explore tensions and complexities among the sources.

Be careful not to dismiss a source only because of who wrote it. "The company would say that" isn't a rebuttal. Explain how the source's interests might shape its evidence, then deal with the evidence itself (9.3).

Spotting perspective in a reading passage

In multiple-choice reading questions, a writer's perspective often shows up in what they notice and what they leave out. A writer who mentions only costs may be speaking as a budget official; a writer who keeps returning to children's experiences may be speaking as a teacher or parent. Look at the passage's introduction and at the writer's examples for clues.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Same position, different perspectives

    Practice sources (written for this practice set; all invented): Source A, a school nurse: "Students who sleep more come to my office less. Starting at 8:45 would protect their health." Source B, a local business owner: "Teens who are alert in class are better workers in my store after school. I support a later start." Source C, a bus company manager: "A later start lets us use the same buses for elementary and high school runs, which saves money." Identify each source's position and perspective. Then write one sentence that uses the pattern as evidence.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Position: all three support a later start time.
    2. Step 2: Perspectives: A speaks from health expertise, B from the interests of an employer, C from the logistics and costs of transportation.
    3. Step 3: Notice what the pattern proves. Health, work and budget concerns don't usually line up, so their agreement suggests the policy has broad benefits.
    4. Step 4: Write a sentence that names the perspectives and explains why their agreement matters.

    Answer: Model sentence: Support for a later start doesn't come from one interest group: a school nurse values it for students' health (Source A), a business owner for alert workers (Source B), and a bus manager for cheaper routes (Source C), and when people who usually want different things reach the same position, the policy is probably meeting more than one real need.

Common mistakes

  • Using "perspective" to mean "opinion." The opinion is the position; the perspective is the background or interest behind it.
  • Grouping sources only as "for" and "against." Within each side, note why different people take that side.
  • Dismissing a source because of its author's interests without dealing with its evidence. Explain the interest, then test the evidence.

On the exam

  • On the synthesis essay, explaining why sources with different perspectives agree or disagree is strong commentary. Keep doing it across the essay, not just once, and it can support the sophistication point.
  • Reading questions may ask what a writer's background contributes to an argument. Look for answers that link the writer's role to the kind of evidence they use.

Connected topics

Videos

  • Conversation of Sources | AP Lang Synthesis Essays

    Coach Hall WritesWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • How to Write the AP Lang Synthesis Essay: Read the Sources

    Marco LearningWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • How to GENERATE CONVERSATION between Synthesis Sources (2 Ways)

    Garden of EnglishWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • How to Read Synthesis Sources Like a Beast | AP Lang Masterclass (Part 2)

    Zubafy: Read, Write, ReasonWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 6.3 Position versus perspective. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Paragraph 1
Source A. From a memo by the Maple Falls Office of Sustainability to the city council: "City staff measured noise at ten residential sites over two autumn weekends. Gas blowers in use averaged noticeably louder readings than battery models at the same distance. Because gas blowers also release exhaust close to the ground, where workers breathe it, we recommend phasing them out over three years."
Paragraph 2
Source B. From an opinion column by the owner of a local landscaping company, published in the Maple Falls Courier: "My crews would need to replace every blower we own, and battery models cost more and run out of charge by midday. A sudden ban would push small companies like mine out of business, and customers would pay higher prices."
Paragraph 3
Source C. From an anonymous post on a neighborhood message board: "Everyone on my street hates these things. They're the loudest machines ever invented, and they start at 7 a.m. every Saturday. Ban them now!"
Paragraph 4
Source D. From a summary of a study by university researchers, published in a peer-reviewed acoustics journal: "We tested six gas-powered and six battery-powered blower models under laboratory conditions. The gas models produced more low-frequency sound, which travels farther through walls. All models tested were at least five years old."

Written for this practice set: four sources a student is reading before writing a synthesis essay on whether the city of Maple Falls should ban gas-powered leaf blowers. Maple Falls is fictional.

Question 1 of 4

Sources A and C both favor a ban. The most important difference between them is that

Question 2 of 4

Which detail most clearly suggests that Source B may be biased?

Paragraph 1
(1) Across the country, a growing number of school districts have moved to a four-day school week, and our district's board will vote on the idea this spring. (2) The board should adopt a four-day week because it would save money and help the district hire teachers.
Paragraph 2
(3) The district currently spends heavily on buses, heating and substitute teachers. (4) According to a state audit of districts that switched, transportation and utility costs fell by an average of 5 percent (Source A). (5) Supporters also say a longer weekend gives families more time together. (6) For example, one parent wrote on her blog that her children are "happier and less exhausted" since their district switched (Source B).
Paragraph 3
(7) A four-day week could also make the district more attractive to teachers. (8) In a survey of 300 teachers in our region, 68 percent said a four-day schedule would make them more likely to apply for a job (Source C).
Paragraph 4
(9) Some people worry that students will learn less. (10) However, students can simply use the extra day to catch up on their own. (11) Overall, the four-day week is a smart change. (12) The board should approve it.

Written for this practice set: a student's draft of a synthesis essay, which cites sources by letter. The sources are invented.

Question 3 of 4

Sentences 4 and 8 cite two sources that both support the four-day week. The writer wants to point out that the sources reach this position from different perspectives. Which sentence, placed after sentence 8, best does so?

Paragraph 1
Dear Members of the School Board: (1) Thank you for the time you have spent this year trying to balance the district's budget. (2) I know these choices are hard. (3) I am writing about the plan to cut the 5:30 p.m. late bus, which about 150 students ride home after practices, clubs and tutoring.
Paragraph 2
(4) The late bus is a perk for students who stay after school. (5) Many of us have parents who work until evening and cannot pick us up. (6) Without the bus, some students would walk more than two miles along a road with no sidewalk in the dark. (7) Others would simply quit the activities that keep them connected to school.
Paragraph 3
(8) Honestly, cutting the bus is the dumbest idea anyone on the board has ever had. (9) I play on the soccer team and tutor younger students twice a week, so I would be one of the students affected. (10) I hope you will look for savings elsewhere.

Written for this practice set: a student's draft of a letter to the school board.

Question 4 of 4

In sentence 9, the writer mentions playing soccer and tutoring younger students. This detail mainly serves to

0 of 4 answered