Skip to main content

Unit 2 · Topic 2.1

2.1 Writing with an audience's beliefs, values and needs in mind

Writers shape an argument around what they think their audience already believes, values and needs. Knowing whether readers are friendly, neutral or skeptical tells a writer where to start, what to stress and what to leave out.

Key terms

  • audience
  • beliefs
  • values
  • needs
  • common ground

Beliefs, values and needs

Before writers argue, they size up their audience. Three questions do most of the work. What does this audience believe is true? What do they value, meaning what do they see as good, fair or important? What do they need, whether that's information, reassurance, a solution or a reason to act? And what background (age, experience, what they already know about the issue) do they bring with them?

The answers drive almost every choice: which evidence to use, which examples to pick, how formal to sound, which objections to answer, and even what to say first. When you analyze a text, you're working backward: from the choices on the page to the picture of the audience the writer had in mind.

Friendly, neutral and skeptical audiences

AudienceWhat they needCommon moves
Already agreesEnergy and a reason to actCalls to action, shared identity ("we"), vivid reminders of what's at stake
Neutral or unawareInformation and a reason to careBackground, clear examples, a story that makes the issue real
SkepticalTrust and respect before persuasionCommon ground first, concessions, calm tone, evidence from sources they already trust
HostileA reason to keep listening at allShared values, a narrow claim, few direct attacks

Starting from common ground

Common ground is a belief or value the writer and audience share. Starting there lowers the audience's guard. A writer arguing for a new bike lane before drivers might begin with something drivers want too, such as fewer close calls at intersections, before getting to the request.

Common ground has a cost: the more a writer bends toward one audience, the more a different audience may feel ignored or even betrayed. Noticing that tension is a mark of strong analysis.

A case study: Booker T. Washington in Atlanta

On September 18, 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, spoke at the Cotton States and International Exposition in Atlanta. His audience was mixed, but the most powerful listeners were white Southern business and political leaders who wanted economic growth and opposed social equality between the races. Washington built his speech around what that audience valued: economic progress, stability and trust in Black workers they already knew.

The speech was a huge success with that audience, and Washington's supporters saw it as a practical strategy: win jobs, schools and goodwill for Black Southerners at a dangerous time, and build from there. It also drew criticism. Some Black leaders, most famously W. E. B. Du Bois in The Souls of Black Folk (1903), argued that Washington had given up too much, especially on voting, civil rights and higher education. Du Bois's name for the speech, "the Atlanta Compromise," is still how many people know it. Both reactions show the same thing: Washington chose his words for a particular audience, and those choices had consequences beyond the room.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Explaining a choice through the audience's values

    In his 1895 Atlanta address, Booker T. Washington told his largely white Southern audience: "In all things that are purely social we can be as separate as the fingers, yet one as the hand in all things essential to mutual progress." Explain how this sentence reflects Washington's understanding of his audience's beliefs, values and needs.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Name the audience's beliefs and values: white Southern leaders in 1895 insisted on social separation of the races but wanted the South's economy to grow.
    2. Step 2: Find the choice: a simple image of a hand. The fingers are separate, but the hand works as one.
    3. Step 3: Explain how the choice fits the audience. The first half reassures them on the point they cared most about (social separation). The second half asks for what Washington wanted (cooperation and economic opportunity) in terms of their own goal, "mutual progress."
    4. Step 4: Add a layer of complexity: the image also frames Black Southerners as essential to the region's success, which quietly raises their value in the audience's eyes.

    Answer: Model paragraph: Washington knew that his white Southern listeners would reject any call for social equality, so he gave them reassurance first: in social matters the races could stay "as separate as the fingers." But the image does not end there. By adding that they could be "one as the hand" in what is "essential to mutual progress," he recast Black workers as part of the South's economic body, which matched the audience's strongest want: growth. The sentence persuades by granting the audience's belief and then attaching his request to their own goal, although critics would later argue that this grant cost Black Americans too much.

Common mistakes

  • Describing the audience by demographics alone ("white men") without saying what they believed, valued or needed.
  • Assuming a writer agrees with everything the audience believes. Writers often meet an audience partway in order to move them.
  • Ignoring that a choice that wins one audience can alienate another.

On the exam

  • Multiple-choice questions may ask which belief or value a passage assumes its audience holds. Look for what the writer takes for granted.
  • In Question 2, commentary that explains why a choice would work on this audience is what moves an essay up in Row B, the 4-point Evidence and Commentary row.

Connected topics

Videos

  • Get to Know Your Audience | Rhetoric & Composition | Study Hall

    Study HallWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Writing With Your Audience in Mind

    Tony DeFilippoWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • *EASIER* How to Identify the RHETORICAL EFFECT (While Annotating!) | AP® Lang Q2

    Garden of EnglishWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The Basics of Rhetoric | Understanding Your Audience

    Writing with AndrewWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Audience Analysis

    COMMpadres MediaWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 2.1 Writing with an audience's beliefs, values and needs in mind. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Paragraph 1
At this second appearing to take the oath of the Presidential office there is less occasion for an extended address than there was at the first. Then a statement somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued seemed fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, little that is new could be presented. The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured.
Paragraph 2
On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago, all thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it,—all sought to avert it. While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, insurgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war,—seeking to dissolve the Union, and divide effects, by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war; but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish. And the war came.
Paragraph 3
One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union even by war, while the Government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it. Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with or even before the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men's faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully. The Almighty has His own purposes. "Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh." If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether."
Paragraph 4
With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.

Abraham Lincoln, Second Inaugural Address, delivered at the U.S. Capitol on March 4, 1865, in the final weeks of the Civil War, before a crowd that included officials, soldiers and ordinary citizens. Lincoln had been reelected; the Union was close to victory.

Question 1 of 4

In paragraph 1, Lincoln's remark that "little that is new could be presented" and his refusal to make a prediction about the war primarily serve to

Question 2 of 4

In paragraph 2, Lincoln says that "Both parties deprecated war" before explaining that one "would make war" and the other "would accept war." This sequence most likely serves to

Question 3 of 4

Lincoln's observation that "Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God" (paragraph 3) most likely serves to

Paragraph 1
After considering the historic page, and viewing the living world with anxious solicitude, the most melancholy emotions of sorrowful indignation have depressed my spirits, and I have sighed when obliged to confess, that either nature has made a great difference between man and man, or that the civilization, which has hitherto taken place in the world, has been very partial. I have turned over various books written on the subject of education, and patiently observed the conduct of parents and the management of schools; but what has been the result? a profound conviction, that the neglected education of my fellow creatures is the grand source of the misery I deplore; and that women in particular, are rendered weak and wretched by a variety of concurring causes, originating from one hasty conclusion. The conduct and manners of women, in fact, evidently prove, that their minds are not in a healthy state; for, like the flowers that are planted in too rich a soil, strength and usefulness are sacrificed to beauty; and the flaunting leaves, after having pleased a fastidious eye, fade, disregarded on the stalk, long before the season when they ought to have arrived at maturity. One cause of this barren blooming I attribute to a false system of education, gathered from the books written on this subject by men, who, considering females rather as women than human creatures, have been more anxious to make them alluring mistresses than rational wives; and the understanding of the sex has been so bubbled by this specious homage, that the civilized women of the present century, with a few exceptions, are only anxious to inspire love, when they ought to cherish a nobler ambition, and by their abilities and virtues exact respect.
Paragraph 2
I am aware of an obvious inference: from every quarter have I heard exclamations against masculine women; but where are they to be found? If, by this appellation, men mean to inveigh against their ardour in hunting, shooting, and gaming, I shall most cordially join in the cry; but if it be, against the imitation of manly virtues, or, more properly speaking, the attainment of those talents and virtues, the exercise of which ennobles the human character, and which raise females in the scale of animal being, when they are comprehensively termed mankind—all those who view them with a philosophical eye must, I should think, wish with me, that they may every day grow more and more masculine.

Mary Wollstonecraft, an English writer and teacher, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792), from the introduction. Many popular books of the time, most of them written by men, advised that girls be educated mainly to please. Some text is omitted between paragraphs 1 and 2.

Question 4 of 4

In paragraph 2, Wollstonecraft expects readers to object that she wants women to become "masculine." She responds by

0 of 4 answered