Skip to main content

Unit 5 · Topic 5.9

5.9 Congressional Elections

Congressional candidates usually win their party's nomination in a primary and then face the other party's nominee in the general election. Every House seat and about a third of Senate seats are up every two years. Incumbents win reelection most of the time thanks to name recognition, fundraising and service to their constituents, and turnout drops in midterm years.

Key terms

  • incumbency advantage
  • midterm election
  • primary election
  • general election

How congressional elections work

Candidates first compete in a primary election to win their party's nomination, then face the other party's nominee in the general election in November. States set the primary rules: many use open or closed primaries (5.8), a few let parties pick some nominees through conventions or caucuses, and California and Washington use a top-two primary in which all candidates share one ballot. All 435 House seats are on the ballot every two years. Senators serve six-year terms in three staggered classes, so about a third of Senate seats are up in each election.

Midterm elections are held halfway through a president's term. Turnout is lower than in presidential years (5.2), and the president's party usually loses seats in Congress in midterms, partly because voters use the election to check the president and partly because the president's most enthusiastic supporters are less likely to turn out without the president on the ballot.

The incumbency advantage

Incumbents, the people already in office, win reelection most of the time. In most recent elections, more than 90 percent of House incumbents running again have won, and Senate incumbents have typically won at somewhat lower but still high rates. Reasons include:

  • Name recognition: voters already know the incumbent from years of news coverage and local events.
  • Casework: incumbents and their staff help constituents with problems like lost Social Security checks or veterans' benefits, building goodwill.
  • Pork and credit-claiming: members bring federal projects home and take credit for them.
  • Franking privilege: members can send official mail to constituents at government expense, within limits.
  • Fundraising: donors, especially PACs, prefer to give to likely winners, so incumbents usually raise far more than challengers.
  • Safe districts: redistricting and partisan sorting have created many districts that reliably favor one party, so the only real competition is in the primary.
  • Weak challengers: strong potential candidates often wait for an open seat instead of taking on an incumbent.

Why Senate races are more competitive

Senate incumbents face tougher races than House members for several reasons. A state is usually more diverse than a single House district, and states can't be gerrymandered. Senate races draw more media attention and well-funded, well-known challengers, such as governors or House members. And a six-year term gives more time for an incumbent's votes to become an issue.

Effects of the incumbency advantage

Supporters say high reelection rates reflect experienced, responsive members whom voters like. Critics say they reduce competition and accountability, and that safe seats push members to focus on primary voters, who tend to hold stronger ideological views, which feeds polarization (2.3). Proposals like term limits for members of Congress come out of this debate; the Supreme Court ruled in 1995 that states can't impose term limits on their own members of Congress.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Explaining the incumbency advantage

    A House member's staff helps hundreds of constituents each year resolve problems with federal agencies, and the member raises five times as much money as any challenger. Identify two sources of incumbency advantage in this scenario and explain how each helps reelection.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: First source: helping constituents with federal agencies is casework. It builds personal goodwill and loyalty that can cross party lines.
    2. Step 2: Second source: the fundraising gap. Donors give to likely winners, and more money buys more advertising and outreach, making it harder for a challenger to become known.
    3. Step 3: Each explanation links the advantage to how it produces votes.

    Answer: Casework builds goodwill among constituents, and a large fundraising edge lets the incumbent outspend and out-advertise challengers, both making reelection more likely.

Common mistakes

  • Saying the whole Senate is elected every two years. Only about a third of seats are up in each election.
  • Saying the president's party usually gains seats in midterms. It usually loses them.
  • Explaining incumbency advantage only by name recognition. Casework, fundraising, safe districts and weak challengers matter too.

On the exam

  • Quantitative analysis questions may show House and Senate reelection rates. Describe the difference and explain why Senate races are more competitive.
  • Concept application questions may describe an incumbent's activities and ask how they create an electoral advantage.

Connected topics

Videos

  • Congressional ELECTIONS [AP Gov Review, Unit 5 Topic 9 (5.9)]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • AP Gov 5.9, 5.10 | Congressional Elections & Modern Campaigns | NEW!

    Carey LaMannaWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Congressional elections | Political participation | US government and civics | Khan Academy

    Khan AcademyWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Congressional Elections: Crash Course Government and Politics #6

    CrashCourseWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Why do midterm congressional elections matter? | US government and civics | Khan Academy

    Khan AcademyWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

5 questions on 5.9 Congressional Elections. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Election yearTypeHouse incumbents seeking reelectionIncumbents reelected
Year 1Presidential400380
Year 2Midterm390351
Year 3Presidential395383
Year 4Midterm385339

Hypothetical data

Question 1 of 5

Which statement is supported by the data?

Question 2 of 5

Which of the following best explains the pattern of incumbent success in the table?

Question 3 of 5

Incumbent senators lose reelection somewhat more often than incumbent House members. Which of the following best explains this difference?

MidtermPresident's partyHouse seats the president's party gained (+) or lost (−)President's approval rating before the election (%)
1Party A−2647
2Party B−5444
3Party A+563
4Party B−1352
5Party A−6340

Hypothetical results of five midterm elections

Question 4 of 5

Which conclusion is best supported by the data?

Question 5 of 5

Which explanation for the overall pattern is most consistent with retrospective voting?

0 of 5 answered