AP® United States Government and Politics review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/gov/units/2/2-6)
Unit 2 · Topic 2.6
2.6 Expansion of Presidential Power
Presidential power has grown far beyond what Article II spells out, often defended with arguments like Alexander Hamilton's in Federalist No. 70: the country needs one energetic executive. Concern about too much power led to limits such as the Twenty-Second Amendment, and Americans still debate whether presidents should read their powers narrowly or broadly.
Key terms
- Federalist No. 70
- single (unitary) executive
- Twenty-Second Amendment
- limited vs. expansive views of presidential power
Federalist No. 70 (Hamilton, 1788)
Hamilton's main claim is that “energy in the executive” is a leading feature of good government. A weak executive means weak execution of the laws, and a government that executes badly is a bad government in practice, whatever it looks like on paper.
Energy matters, he argues, for defending the country against foreign attack, for steady administration of the laws, for protecting property and for securing liberty against factions and disorder.
The first ingredient of energy is unity: one person, not a council. A single executive can act with “decision, activity, secrecy, and dispatch.” A plural executive invites disagreement and delay, and it lets officials hide behind one another, so the public can't tell whom to blame. A single president is easier to hold accountable. Hamilton also says the executive needs enough time in office, secure pay and adequate powers.
Why some founders worried
Anti-Federalists feared the presidency would grow into a monarchy, especially with command of the army and no term limit. Hamilton's answer was that the president would be checked by elections, impeachment, the Senate's role in treaties and appointments, and Congress's control of money and war.
How presidential power expanded
- Thomas Jefferson bought the Louisiana Territory (1803) even though he doubted the Constitution clearly allowed it.
- Abraham Lincoln, during the Civil War, suspended the writ of habeas corpus in some areas, ordered a naval blockade and issued the Emancipation Proclamation as commander in chief.
- Theodore Roosevelt argued for a stewardship view: the president may do anything for the public good that the Constitution or laws don't forbid.
- Franklin Roosevelt led a vast expansion of the executive branch during the Great Depression and World War II and won four presidential elections.
- During the Cold War and after the September 11, 2001, attacks, presidents claimed broad powers over national security, intelligence and the use of force, often without a declaration of war.
Limits and the Twenty-Second Amendment
George Washington stepped down after two terms, setting a tradition that lasted until Franklin Roosevelt won a third term in 1940 and a fourth in 1944. In response, Congress proposed the Twenty-Second Amendment in 1947, and it was ratified in 1951. It says no one can be elected president more than twice. Someone who serves more than two years of another president's term can be elected only once, so the most anyone can serve is about ten years.
Other limits on expansion include the War Powers Resolution (1973), court rulings such as Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952) and United States v. Nixon (1974), and Congress's power of the purse.
Limited versus expansive views
This debate isn't settled and doesn't line up neatly with one party. Members of Congress often criticize broad presidential power when the other party holds the White House and defend it when their own does.
| View | Main idea | Argument for it |
|---|---|---|
| Limited (literalist) | The president may use only powers clearly granted by the Constitution or by Congress. President William Howard Taft is linked to this view. | Protects against abuse, respects Congress as the lawmaking branch and keeps government within written limits |
| Expansive (stewardship) | The president may take any action for the public good not expressly forbidden. Theodore Roosevelt is linked to this view. | Lets the government respond quickly to crises and gives the nation one accountable leader, echoing Federalist No. 70 |
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
Using Federalist No. 70 in an argument
Write a claim and one supporting paragraph responding to: “Should the president have broad power to act in national emergencies?” Use Federalist No. 70.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: Make a defensible claim that answers the question, for example: Yes, because a single, energetic executive can respond to crises quickly and remain accountable.
- Step 2: Explain the evidence: Hamilton argued that unity gives the executive “decision, activity, secrecy, and dispatch,” qualities a slow, divided body lacks.
- Step 3: Add course knowledge: as commander in chief, the president can direct the military immediately, which Congress, with 535 members, cannot.
- Step 4: Tie back to the claim and note the safeguard: one person is easier to hold accountable through elections and impeachment.
Answer: Sample: The president should have broad power in emergencies because one executive can act with a speed a large legislature can't match. In Federalist No. 70, Hamilton argued that unity lets the executive act with “decision, activity, secrecy, and dispatch,” while a plural body would stall and spread blame. As commander in chief, the president can direct the military immediately in a crisis, and because power rests in one person, voters and Congress know exactly whom to hold responsible.
Common mistakes
- Attributing Federalist No. 70 to Madison. Hamilton wrote it.
- Saying the Twenty-Second Amendment limits presidents to eight years. It limits how many times a person can be elected; with part of a predecessor's term, someone could serve about ten years.
- Writing about Federalist No. 70 as if it argued for unlimited power. Hamilton paired energy with safety, meaning accountability to the people.
On the exam
- Federalist No. 70 is a required document and a common piece of evidence in argument essays about presidential power. Also prepare a counterargument based on checks and balances or Federalist No. 51.
- Multiple-choice questions may ask why the Twenty-Second Amendment was adopted: it responded to Franklin Roosevelt's four elections.
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself
5 questions on 2.6 Expansion of Presidential Power. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
Energy in the Executive is a leading character in the definition of good government. It is essential to the protection of the community against foreign attacks; it is not less essential to the steady administration of the laws; to the protection of property against those irregular and high-handed combinations which sometimes interrupt the ordinary course of justice; to the security of liberty against the enterprises and assaults of ambition, of faction, and of anarchy.
… That unity is conducive to energy will not be disputed. Decision, activity, secrecy, and despatch will generally characterize the proceedings of one man in a much more eminent degree than the proceedings of any greater number; and in proportion as the number is increased, these qualities will be diminished.
Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 70, 1788
Which of the following best summarizes Hamilton's argument?
Someone worried that the reasoning in the passage could lead to too much presidential power would most likely support
Source 1: My belief was that it was not only his right but his duty to do anything that the needs of the Nation demanded unless such action was forbidden by the Constitution or by the laws.
Source 2: The true view of the Executive functions is, as I conceive it, that the President can exercise no power which cannot be fairly and reasonably traced to some specific grant of power or justly implied and included within such express grant as proper and necessary to its exercise.
Source 1: Theodore Roosevelt, An Autobiography, 1913. Source 2: William Howard Taft, Our Chief Magistrate and His Powers, 1916
Which statement best describes the difference between the two sources?
A president, with no law on the subject, issues an order setting aside a stretch of federal land as a wildlife refuge. Which statement best describes how the two authors would view this action?
Hamilton's argument for “energy in the executive” in Federalist No. 70 is most consistent with
0 of 5 answered