Skip to main content

Unit 1 · Topic 1.5

1.5 Ratification of the U.S. Constitution

In 1787, delegates in Philadelphia wrote a new constitution by compromising on representation, slavery and how to choose a president. They made the document hard but possible to amend through Article V. Ratification succeeded partly because Federalists promised a Bill of Rights to win over Anti-Federalists.

Key terms

  • Great (Connecticut) Compromise
  • Electoral College
  • Three-Fifths Compromise
  • Article V amendment process
  • Bill of Rights
  • U.S. Constitution

Representation: the Great Compromise

Large and small states clashed over how to count each state in Congress.

The Virginia Plan, drafted mainly by James Madison, proposed a two-house legislature with seats in both houses based on population. Large states liked it. The New Jersey Plan, offered by William Paterson, kept a one-house legislature with equal votes for each state. Small states liked it.

Roger Sherman and other Connecticut delegates proposed the Great (Connecticut) Compromise: a bicameral (two-house) Congress with a House of Representatives based on population and a Senate with two members per state. Bills to raise revenue must start in the House, the chamber closest to the people.

Slavery: three compromises

  • Three-Fifths Compromise: for both House seats and direct taxes, each enslaved person counted as three-fifths of a person. Southern states wanted enslaved people counted fully for representation; northern states didn't want them counted at all. The compromise gave slave states extra House seats and electoral votes.
  • Slave trade clause: Congress could not ban the importation of enslaved people before 1808. Congress banned it as soon as it was allowed, effective 1808.
  • Fugitive slave clause: people escaping enslavement had to be returned, even from free states.
  • The Thirteenth Amendment (1865) abolished slavery, and the Fourteenth (1868) ended the three-fifths rule by counting the whole number of persons in each state.

Choosing a president: the Electoral College

Delegates rejected both election by Congress (which would weaken the separation of powers) and a direct national popular vote (which some feared and which raised the slavery-counting problem again). The compromise was the Electoral College. Each state gets electors equal to its number of House members plus its two senators, and the electors choose the president. It reflected federalism, distrust of pure democracy and the large-state versus small-state divide.

The finished Constitution

PartWhat it covers
PreamblePurposes of government, beginning “We the People”
Article ICongress and its powers
Article IIThe president and executive power
Article IIIThe federal courts
Article IVRelations among the states, such as full faith and credit
Article VThe amendment process
Article VISupremacy of the Constitution and national law; no religious test for office
Article VIIRatification by 9 of 13 state conventions

Article V: changing the Constitution

Amending takes two steps, and each step has two possible methods.

Proposal: two-thirds of both the House and the Senate vote to propose, or two-thirds of state legislatures ask Congress to call a national convention. Every amendment so far has been proposed by Congress.

Ratification: three-fourths of the states approve, either through their legislatures or through special state conventions. With 50 states, that means 38. Only the Twenty-First Amendment, which repealed Prohibition, was ratified by state conventions.

Requiring supermajorities at both steps makes change hard but possible, and it gives states a direct role. Congress has sent 33 amendments to the states; 27 have been ratified.

Ratification and the Bill of Rights

Under Article VII, the Constitution took effect once 9 state conventions approved it. Delaware ratified first, in December 1787, and New Hampshire became the ninth in June 1788. Big states like Virginia and New York ratified narrowly soon after. Anti-Federalists' strongest complaint was the missing bill of rights, and several states ratified while recommending amendments. Madison drafted amendments in the First Congress in 1789, and the first ten, the Bill of Rights, were ratified in 1791.

The compromises that won ratification left some big questions open, and Americans still argue about them: how much power the national government should have, how much belongs to the states, and how far individual rights reach. Two current examples: after the September 11, 2001, attacks, the national government expanded surveillance, which set off a lasting debate over security versus privacy (3.6); and Americans keep debating what role the national government should play in public schools, which states and local districts mainly run (4.10).

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Applying Article V to a scenario

    Both houses of Congress pass a proposed amendment by two-thirds votes. After seven years, 36 state legislatures have ratified it. Has it become part of the Constitution? Explain.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Check the proposal step: two-thirds of both houses is one valid method, so proposal is complete.
    2. Step 2: Check ratification: three-fourths of 50 states is 37.5, which rounds up to 38 states.
    3. Step 3: Compare: 36 is fewer than 38, so ratification is not complete. (Congress also often sets a time limit, commonly seven years, which could end the effort.)

    Answer: No. It needs 38 states (three-fourths of 50), and only 36 have ratified.

Common mistakes

  • Saying the Great Compromise created the Electoral College. It settled representation in Congress; the Electoral College was a separate compromise.
  • Thinking the Three-Fifths Compromise was about voting rights. It counted enslaved people for apportioning House seats and taxes; enslaved people could not vote.
  • Saying the president plays a role in amendments. The president can't propose or veto an amendment; Article V involves only Congress, conventions and the states.

On the exam

  • Know the Article V numbers: two-thirds to propose, three-fourths to ratify. Questions often test which combination of steps is valid.
  • Expect questions asking how a compromise reflects a conflict, such as the Great Compromise balancing large and small states.

Connected topics

Videos

  • RATIFICATION of the Constitution [AP Government Review, Unit 1 Topic 5]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • AP Gov | 1.5 Ratification of the U.S. Constitution | NEW!

    Carey LaMannaWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The U.S. Constitution, EXPLAINED [AP Government Required Documents]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Constitutional Compromises: Crash Course Government and Politics #5

    CrashCourseWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The making of the American Constitution - Judy Walton

    TED-EdWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The Constitutional Convention | Period 3: 1754-1800 | AP US History | Khan Academy

    Khan AcademyWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 1.5 Ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

StatePopulationHouse seatsSenate seats
State W9,000,000122
State X3,000,00042
State Y1,500,00022
State Z750,00012

Hypothetical data: a four-state legislature organized like Congress

Question 1 of 4

Which statement is supported by the data in the table?

Question 2 of 4

The pattern of Senate seats in the table reflects a compromise designed mainly to

Question 3 of 4

Congress proposes a constitutional amendment by a two-thirds vote in each chamber. Before the deadline Congress set, the legislatures of 36 of the 50 states ratify it. What is the status of the amendment?

Question 4 of 4

Activists want to propose a constitutional amendment, but they know it will never get a two-thirds vote in both chambers of Congress. Under Article V, which other path could they use to get the amendment proposed?

0 of 4 answered