Skip to main content

Unit 3 · Topic 3.2

3.2 The English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution

In 17th-century England, kings and Parliament fought over taxes, religion and who held final power. The fight led to civil war, a king's execution, Cromwell's rule, the return of monarchy and finally the Glorious Revolution, which made Parliament the dominant partner.

Key terms

  • divine right of kings
  • Oliver Cromwell
  • Restoration (1660)
  • Glorious Revolution (1688)
  • English Bill of Rights (1689)
  • parliamentary sovereignty

Stuart kings versus Parliament

James I (reigned 1603–1625), already king of Scotland, believed in divine right and quarreled with Parliament over money. His son Charles I (1625–1649) went further. He collected taxes without Parliament's consent and jailed people who refused to pay. In 1628 Parliament made him accept the Petition of Right, which banned taxes without Parliament's consent and imprisonment without cause. Charles then ruled without Parliament from 1629 to 1640, raising money through old fees like ship money.

Religion made things worse. Charles's archbishop, William Laud, pushed ceremonies that Puritans saw as Catholic, and Charles married a Catholic French princess. When Charles forced a new prayer book on Presbyterian Scotland, the Scots rebelled. Needing money for war, Charles had to call Parliament in 1640.

Civil war and the Commonwealth

This Long Parliament attacked royal powers, and in 1642 civil war broke out between Royalists (Cavaliers) and Parliament's supporters (Roundheads), many of them Puritans. Parliament's New Model Army, a disciplined force commanded by Sir Thomas Fairfax with Oliver Cromwell as its leading cavalry general, won. Charles I was tried and executed on January 30, 1649, an act that shocked Europe.

England became a republic called the Commonwealth. Parliament abolished the monarchy and the House of Lords. Radical groups appeared: the Levellers wanted voting rights for most men, and the Diggers wanted land held in common. Cromwell crushed these groups and brutally conquered Ireland. In 1653 he dissolved Parliament and ruled as Lord Protector, backed by the army and enforcing strict Puritan rules, until his death in 1658.

Restoration and Glorious Revolution

Many people were tired of military rule, so Parliament invited Charles II back in 1660, the Restoration. Parliament passed the Test Act (1673), barring non-Anglicans from public office, and the Habeas Corpus Act (1679), protecting against unjust imprisonment.

Charles II's brother, James II (1685–1688), was openly Catholic. He appointed Catholics to office and kept a standing army. When his son was born in 1688, raising the prospect of a Catholic dynasty, Parliament's leaders invited his Protestant daughter Mary and her husband William of Orange, ruler of the Dutch Republic, to take the throne. William landed with an army, James fled to France, and almost no blood was shed in England, which is why it's called the Glorious Revolution.

The 1689 settlement

The result was a constitutional monarchy in which Parliament held sovereignty, meaning final authority to make law. Power still rested with landowners, though, since only a small share of men could vote. In the 1700s a prime minister and cabinet, starting with Robert Walpole (1721–1742), ran the government through Parliament.

  • English Bill of Rights (1689): the monarch could not suspend laws, raise taxes or keep a peacetime army without Parliament's consent; Parliament was to meet often and debate freely; no Catholic could inherit the throne.
  • Toleration Act (1689): Protestant dissenters could worship in their own churches, though Catholics and non-Anglicans were still barred from office.
  • John Locke's Two Treatises of Government (published 1689) argued that government rests on the consent of the governed and that people may resist a ruler who violates their natural rights to life, liberty and property.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    A causation chain

    Short-answer practice: Explain one cause of the English Civil War.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Name a specific cause.
    2. Step 2: Show how it created conflict between king and Parliament.
    3. Step 3: Link it to the outbreak of war in 1642.

    Answer: Model answer: Charles I's attempt to impose a new prayer book on Presbyterian Scotland led the Scots to rebel, and he had to call Parliament in 1640 to raise money for war. Parliament used the chance to demand limits on his powers, and the standoff over who controlled the army turned into civil war in 1642.

  2. Example 2

    Explaining significance

    Short-answer practice: Explain one way the English Bill of Rights (1689) changed English government.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Name a specific provision.
    2. Step 2: Explain what it shifted from the crown to Parliament.

    Answer: Model answer: The Bill of Rights barred the monarch from raising taxes or keeping a peacetime army without Parliament's consent. Because the crown now depended on Parliament for money and soldiers, Parliament became the dominant power, turning England into a constitutional monarchy.

Common mistakes

  • Saying the Glorious Revolution created democracy. It made Parliament supreme, but Parliament represented a small landowning elite.
  • Confusing Cromwell's rule with constitutional government. The Protectorate was a military regime.
  • Mixing up the Petition of Right (1628, under Charles I) and the Bill of Rights (1689, under William and Mary).

On the exam

  • England is the main example of constitutionalism. Comparison questions often set it against Louis XIV's France.
  • Locke's ideas connect this topic to the Enlightenment (4.3) and later revolutions; use that link for complexity.

Connected topics

Videos

  • The ENGLISH CIVIL WAR and GLORIOUS REVOLUTION [AP Euro Review—Unit 3 Topic 2]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • AP Euro 3.2: The English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution

    Emily NeinastWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • English Civil War: Crash Course European History #14

    CrashCourseWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Ten Minute English and British History #20 - The English Civil War

    History MattersWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Was the Glorious Revolution a Dutch Conquest? (Short Animated Documentary)

    History MattersWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Why Did England Have a Civil War? | History in a Nutshell | Animated History

    English HeritageWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

5 questions on 3.2 The English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Question 1 of 5

Which of the following best describes England under Oliver Cromwell (1649–1658)?

Question 2 of 5

In the Petition of Right (1628), Parliament demanded that Charles I

Source 1: The state of monarchy is the supremest thing upon earth; for kings are not only God's lieutenants upon earth, and sit upon God's throne, but even by God himself they are called gods. . . . [Kings] make and unmake their subjects, they have power of raising and casting down, of life and of death, judges over all their subjects and in all causes and yet accountable to none but God only.

Source 2: That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal; . . . That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, without grant of Parliament . . . is illegal; . . . That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law; That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law; That election of members of Parliament ought to be free . . . .

Source 1: King James I of England, speech to Parliament, March 1610. From James Harvey Robinson, ed., Readings in European History, 1906. Source 2: English Bill of Rights, passed by Parliament, 1689.

Question 3 of 5

Which of the following developments in the decades after Source 1 most directly challenged the view of kingship it expresses?

Question 4 of 5

Source 2 differs from Source 1 most clearly in arguing that

Question 5 of 5

The clause allowing "subjects which are Protestants" to have arms is best understood in the context of

0 of 5 answered