AP® Art History review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/art-history/units/9/9-3)
Unit 9 · Topic 9.3
9.3 Theories and Interpretations of Pacific Art
Nan Madol, the moai of Rapa Nui and New Ireland's malagan raise big questions: how were they made, what did they mean, and what happens when a work is meant to disappear? Interpretations have changed as archaeology, oral tradition and the voices of Pacific peoples have been taken seriously.
Key terms
- Saudeleur dynasty
- moai
- ahu (platform)
- malagan
- ephemeral art
- ancestors
Interpreting Pacific art
Pacific works often store knowledge, beliefs and social relationships, held by trained members of a community. Their meaning may lie less in the object than in its making, its performance and even its destruction. A memory created at a ceremony can matter more than the thing that was shown.
Outsiders long explained Pacific monuments with myths of lost races or ecological collapse. Today's interpretations combine archaeology and dating methods with oral traditions and the knowledge of the communities themselves.
Nan Madol
Nan Madol (Pohnpei, Micronesia; Saudeleur Dynasty; c. 700–1600 CE; basalt boulders and prismatic columns). Off the coast of Pohnpei, builders raised nearly 100 artificial islets on a coral reef, crossed by canals. Their walls are made of long, six-sided basalt columns, which form naturally when lava cools and cracks. Builders stacked them crosswise, like a log cabin, and filled the spaces with coral and rubble. Walls on the royal mortuary islet of Nandauwas reach about 7.5 meters.
Nan Madol was the political and ceremonial center of the Saudeleur rulers, who made other chiefs live there under watch. One part held residences and administration; another held tombs and priests' quarters. How workers moved columns weighing several tons is still debated. Pohnpeian tradition says two sorcerer brothers flew the stones into place; archaeologists suggest rafts at high tide and levers. The Saudeleur were eventually overthrown, and the site was abandoned.
Moai on platform (ahu)
Moai on platform (ahu) (Rapa Nui (Easter Island); c. 1100–1600 CE; volcanic tuff figures on basalt base). Islanders carved nearly 1,000 moai from soft volcanic tuff at the Rano Raraku quarry. Most stood on stone platforms (ahu) near the coast, facing inland toward the villages with their backs to the sea. They are generally understood as deified ancestors watching over their descendants. Some wore red stone topknots (pukao), and eyes of white coral with dark stone pupils were inserted, perhaps to activate the figure's mana.
Interpretations have shifted. A popular theory held that islanders cut down their forests to move moai and caused their own collapse. Many researchers now stress other causes, such as rats eating palm seeds and, above all, European diseases and the 1860s slave raids. Experiments suggest moai could be "walked" upright with ropes, matching oral traditions that the moai walked. By the mid-1800s, all moai had been toppled. Several were later re-erected, and some taken abroad are subjects of return requests.
Malagan display and mask
Malagan display and mask (New Ireland Province, Papua New Guinea; c. 20th century CE; wood, pigment, fiber, and shell). Malagan are ceremonies honoring the dead, held months or years after a death. Carvers make intricate openwork figures, friezes and masks, painted in red, black, white and yellow, with eyes made of sea-snail shell. Birds, fish, snakes and human figures interlock. The carvings are shown in a specially built display house during the ceremony.
When the ceremony ends, the carvings have done their job: they are left to decay, destroyed, or, since the late 1800s, sold to outsiders. Rights to a malagan design pass from owner to owner, so the image lives on in memory and can be made again. Scholars interpret the carvings as temporary bodies for the life force of the dead, released when the ceremony ends. That's why museums holding malagan face a puzzle: they preserve objects whose meaning depended on their disappearing.
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
Explain how an interpretation changed
Explain how interpretations of the Moai on platform (ahu) have changed over time, and why.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: State an earlier interpretation: islanders destroyed their environment to build and move moai.
- Step 2: Name the new evidence: rat damage to palms, the impact of European disease and slave raids, experiments in walking moai.
- Step 3: State the newer interpretation and give credit to Rapa Nui oral tradition.
Answer: Model answer: An influential interpretation argued that Rapa Nui islanders cut down their forests to move moai, causing their own collapse. More recent research has qualified this view: evidence suggests rats ate palm seeds, and the greatest population losses came after European contact, from disease and the slave raids of the 1860s. Experiments showing that moai could be rocked upright with ropes also match Rapa Nui oral traditions that the statues walked. The moai are now more often seen as achievements of a resourceful society honoring its ancestors.
Common mistakes
- Saying the moai face the sea. Most face inland, toward the communities they protected.
- Calling malagan destruction a loss or accident. Letting the carvings decay or disposing of them is part of the ceremony's meaning.
- Calling Nan Madol's basalt columns carved. Their six-sided shape forms naturally when lava cools.
- Repeating the "ecocide" theory about Rapa Nui as settled fact. It is debated.
On the exam
- Interpretation questions reward naming a specific reading and the evidence behind it, plus how new evidence changed it.
- Malagan is the classic example of ephemeral art made to be destroyed; compare it with other temporary works such as The Gates.
- Learn the identifiers exactly: Nan Madol, Saudeleur Dynasty, c. 700–1600 CE, basalt.
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself: 9.3 Theories and Interpretations of Pacific Art
5 questions on 9.3 Theories and Interpretations of Pacific Art. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
Nan Madol. Pohnpei, Micronesia. Saudeleur Dynasty. c. 700–1600 CE. Basalt boulders and prismatic columns.
Walls built of long, six-sided basalt columns stacked crosswise, like a log cabin, with boulders filling the spaces, rising from artificial islets separated by tidal canals.
Identifiers from the AP Art History CED's list of required works; description written for this practice set
Nan Madol served the Saudeleur dynasty as
According to Pohnpeian tradition, the rule of the Saudeleur dynasty at Nan Madol ended when
How the builders moved and lifted Nan Madol's huge basalt columns is still uncertain. One local tradition says that
Moai on platform (ahu). Rapa Nui (Easter Island). c. 1100–1600 CE. Volcanic tuff figures on basalt base.
A row of huge stone figures with large heads, heavy brows, long noses and short torsos stands on a stone platform, their backs to the ocean.
Identifiers from the AP Art History CED's list of required works; description written for this practice set
Scholars generally think the moai represent
Most moai on platforms stand with their backs to the ocean, facing inland. This is usually explained by
0 of 5 answered