Skip to main content

Unit 3 · Topic 3.5

3.5 Theories and Interpretations of Early European and Colonial American Art

Some works in this unit have no single agreed meaning. This topic covers eight works where scholars still debate symbols, purpose or subject, from the Arnolfini Portrait to Las Meninas, and shows you how to write about competing interpretations.

Key terms

  • iconography
  • symbolism
  • interpretation
  • patron
  • codex
  • glyph

Interpretation and disguised symbolism

Iconography is the study of what images and symbols mean. Northern European paintings of the 1400s are full of ordinary objects that may carry religious meaning, an idea scholars call disguised symbolism. The trouble is that any detail can be over-read. Good interpretation shows evidence for a reading and admits where it's uncertain.

Northern Renaissance puzzles

Annunciation Triptych (Merode Altarpiece) (workshop of Robert Campin; 1427–1432; oil on wood). A triptych has three panels. The angel Gabriel tells Mary she will bear Christ in a middle-class Flemish home. Lilies suggest purity, a just-snuffed candle may signal the divine arriving, and a tiny Christ carrying a cross glides in on rays of light. The donors kneel at the left; Joseph makes mousetraps at the right, which one scholar connected to a saying that the cross was the devil's mousetrap. 'Workshop' signals that several hands may have painted it.

The Arnolfini Portrait (Jan van Eyck; c. 1434; oil on wood). An Italian merchant and a woman stand in a room in Bruges. The convex mirror reflects two figures in the doorway, and an inscription above reads 'Jan van Eyck was here, 1434'. An influential reading argued it records a wedding, with the painter as witness, and treated the single lit candle, the dog and the shoes as symbols. Others see a betrothal, a display of wealth, or a memorial to a wife who had died. She isn't necessarily pregnant: the full dress was fashionable.

Italian Renaissance and Mannerism

Birth of Venus (Sandro Botticelli; c. 1484–1486; tempera on canvas). Venus arrives on a shell, blown by wind gods, while a figure waits with a cloak. Her pose comes from an ancient statue type with arms covering her body. Large nude mythological paintings were rare then. One reading links it to Neoplatonism, a philosophy popular with Florentine humanists, in which earthly beauty leads the soul to divine love; others stress its poetic sources. Its first owner is uncertain.

Entombment of Christ (Jacopo da Pontormo; 1525–1528; oil on wood). Painted for a chapel altar in Florence. There is no tomb, no cross and almost no setting; figures in pink and blue float and twist. This style, Mannerism, rejects calm Renaissance balance. Scholars debate the subject: an entombment, a deposition from the cross, or a lamentation. Some argue Christ's body is offered toward the altar, like the bread of the Mass.

Baroque Spain and the Dutch Republic

Las Meninas (Diego Velázquez; c. 1656; oil on canvas). The princess Margarita stands with her maids of honor (meninas), a dog and attendants, while Velázquez paints at a huge canvas. A mirror at the back reflects King Philip IV and Queen Mariana, who seem to stand where you stand. Is the subject the princess, the royal couple or painting itself? Many read it as Velázquez arguing that painting is an intellectual art; the red cross on his chest marks a knighthood he received later.

Woman Holding a Balance (Johannes Vermeer; c. 1664; oil on canvas). A woman holds an empty balance near pearls and gold, beneath a painting of the Last Judgment, when souls are weighed. A common reading is a lesson on moderation and judging one's life. Scholars debate whether she is pregnant.

Fruit and Insects (Rachel Ruysch; 1711; oil on wood). A still life is a painting of arranged objects. Ruysch, daughter of a famous scientist, was court painter in Düsseldorf. Ripe and rotting fruit, wheat, grapes and insects may be vanitas symbols, reminders that life passes. Others read wheat and grapes as bread and wine, or the painting as scientific observation.

The colonial Americas

Frontispiece of the Codex Mendoza (Viceroyalty of New Spain; c. 1541–1542; ink and color on paper). A frontispiece is a book's opening illustration. Indigenous painters made the codex for Spanish officials, with Spanish notes added. It shows the founding of Tenochtitlan: an eagle on a cactus on a stone, in a lake split into four parts by canals, surrounded by founders. Year signs border the page, and conquests appear below. It can be read as Mexica history in Mexica style or as a colonial record shaped for a Spanish king.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Two interpretations, with evidence

    Describe two interpretations of the Arnolfini Portrait and the evidence for each.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Identify: Jan van Eyck, c. 1434, oil on wood.
    2. Step 2: Interpretation 1: a marriage record. Evidence: joined hands, inscription, two witnesses in the mirror.
    3. Step 3: Interpretation 2: a display of wealth or a memorial. Evidence: luxury goods; research suggesting the first wife had died.
    4. Step 4: Use hedged language and don't claim one reading is proven.

    Answer: Model answer: Jan van Eyck's Arnolfini Portrait (c. 1434) was famously read as a record of a marriage: the couple join hands, the inscription 'Jan van Eyck was here' sounds like a witness's signature, and the mirror shows two figures in the doorway who could be witnesses. Other scholars argue it is a portrait displaying the merchant's wealth, pointing to luxuries like the oranges, the brass chandelier and the fur-lined clothing. Some even suggest it memorializes a wife who had already died. The evidence fits more than one reading, which is why the debate continues.

Common mistakes

  • Stating the Arnolfini woman is pregnant as fact. Her dress follows fashion; it's debated.
  • Treating disguised symbolism as proven for every object. Present it as an interpretation.
  • Saying the Codex Mendoza was made before the conquest. It was made around 1541–1542 for Spanish officials.
  • Calling the Birth of Venus a fresco. It's tempera on canvas.

On the exam

  • Interpretation questions ask what scholars think and why. Name the interpretation, then give two pieces of visual or contextual evidence.
  • Las Meninas and the Arnolfini Portrait are good choices for essays about the viewer, mirrors or the status of the artist.

Connected topics

Videos

  • Jan van Eyck, The Arnolfini Portrait

    SmarthistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • A closer look at 'The Arnolfini Portrait' | National Gallery

    The National GalleryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Aztec Tenochtitlan, a Map of the City in the Codex Mendoza

    ARTSQWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The Arnolfini Portrait by Jan Van Eyck: Great Art Explained

    Great Art ExplainedWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • What is TRIBUTE? | The Aztec Empire's Tribute in the Codex Mendoza

    ARTSQWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • See Jan van Eyck’s original drawings beneath 'The Arnolfini Portrait' | National Gallery

    The National GalleryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself: 3.5 Theories and Interpretations of Early European and Colonial American Art

4 questions on 3.5 Theories and Interpretations of Early European and Colonial American Art. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Virgin (Theotokos) and Child between Saints Theodore and George. Early Byzantine Europe. Sixth or early seventh century CE.Wikimedia Commons. Public domain · Source
A painted wooden panel of an enthroned woman holding a child between two standing soldier saints, with two angels behind her looking up.

Virgin (Theotokos) and Child between Saints Theodore and George. Early Byzantine Europe. Sixth or early seventh century CE.

Wikimedia Commons. Public domain · Source

On a wooden panel, the Virgin sits on a throne holding the Christ Child and gazes slightly to the side. Two soldier saints stand stiffly on either side, looking straight out. Behind them, two angels look upward toward a hand reaching down from a beam of light. The pigments were mixed with hot wax. The panel is kept at the Monastery of Saint Catherine at Mount Sinai, Egypt.

Question 1 of 4

Many scholars explain why this icon survived when most earlier icons did not by pointing to

Pyxis of al-Mughira. Umayyad. c. 968 CE. Ivory.Photo: Shonagon. CC0 · Source
A small, round ivory box with a domed lid, carved all over with figures and animals in lobed medallions among vines.

Pyxis of al-Mughira. Umayyad. c. 968 CE. Ivory.

Photo: Shonagon. CC0 · Source

A small, round ivory box with a domed lid is carved all over with deep, intricate relief. Four eight-lobed medallions frame scenes of courtly life, such as seated figures with musicians and lions attacking bulls, surrounded by vines, birds and animals. An Arabic inscription around the lid names al-Mughira, a son of the caliph, and the year the box was made.

Question 2 of 4

Some scholars read the pyxis's images, made when al-Mughira was coming of age, as a message about

Bayeux Tapestry. Romanesque Europe (English or Norman). c. 1066–1080 CE. Embroidery on linen.Photo: Myrabella. Public domain · Source
A section of a long embroidered strip showing a comet in the sky, men pointing up at it and a crowned king on a throne, with words stitched above.

Bayeux Tapestry. Romanesque Europe (English or Norman). c. 1066–1080 CE. Embroidery on linen.

Photo: Myrabella. Public domain · Source

A strip of linen about 230 feet long and 20 inches high is stitched with colored wool. Scene after scene shows ships being built, an oath sworn over holy relics, a comet in the sky, cavalry charging and soldiers falling. Short Latin captions name people and events, and narrow borders above and below are filled with animals and small scenes.

Question 3 of 4

The Bayeux Tapestry tells the story of the Norman conquest of England largely from the point of view of

Annunciation Triptych (Merode Altarpiece). Workshop of Robert Campin. 1427–1432 CE. Oil on wood.Wikimedia Commons. Public domain · Source
A three-panel oil painting: an angel visits a reading woman in a room in the center, a kneeling couple at a door at left, and a carpenter in his workshop at right.

Annunciation Triptych (Merode Altarpiece). Workshop of Robert Campin. 1427–1432 CE. Oil on wood.

Wikimedia Commons. Public domain · Source

A small, three-part oil painting sets the Annunciation in a middle-class Flemish home. In the center, the angel Gabriel approaches the Virgin, who reads beside a table holding a vase of lilies; a tiny figure of the Christ Child carrying a cross glides toward her on rays of light. On the left wing, the kneeling donors look in through an open door. On the right wing, Joseph works in his carpentry shop, where a finished mousetrap sits on his bench.

Question 4 of 4

Ordinary objects in the painting, such as the lilies and the mousetrap, are best understood as

0 of 4 answered