AP® African American Studies review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/african-american-studies/units/2/2-19)
Unit 2 · Topic 2.19
2.19 Black Political Thought: Radical Resistance
In the 1830s and 1840s, some Black activists rejected the idea that persuasion alone would end slavery. David Walker's Appeal (1829) and Henry Highland Garnet's 'Address to the Slaves' (1843) called on enslaved people to take direct action, including violence if necessary, to win their freedom.
Key terms
- radical resistance
- moral suasion
- David Walker's Appeal
- Henry Highland Garnet
- direct action
Moral suasion versus radical resistance
Many abolitionists in the 1830s and 1840s, led by William Lloyd Garrison, believed in moral suasion: changing people's minds by appealing to their sense of right and wrong, through speeches, newspapers and petitions.
Advocates of radical resistance thought that was too slow. Enslaved people were suffering and dying every day. They wanted enslaved people to destroy slavery themselves, by revolt and, when needed, by force. They used pamphlets describing slavery's horrors to urge enslaved people to use any means to win freedom, and supporters smuggled these pamphlets into the South.
David Walker's Appeal (1829)
David Walker was a free Black man who ran a used-clothing shop in Boston. In 1829 he published his Appeal to the Coloured Citizens of the World, addressing people of African descent everywhere, not just in the US.
Walker answered Thomas Jefferson's Notes on the State of Virginia (1785), which claimed that Black people were naturally inferior, unable to govern themselves and better off enslaved. Walker rejected every point. He also rejected colonization in Africa, insisting that the US, built with Black labor, belonged to Black Americans too.
The Appeal is an example of early Black religious nationalism. Walker warned that God would punish the United States unless it repented and freed the enslaved, and he argued that slavery and true Christianity could not coexist. He urged enslaved people to fight for their freedom, with violence if they had to. Copies were smuggled into Southern ports, some sewn into the clothing of sailors, and Southern states offered rewards for Walker and passed laws against spreading such writing.
Garnet's 'Address to the Slaves' (1843)
Henry Highland Garnet, a minister who had escaped slavery as a child, delivered his address at a national Black convention in Buffalo, New York, in 1843. Speaking directly to enslaved people, he told them they had a duty to resist: 'Let your motto be resistance! resistance! RESISTANCE!' He left the form of resistance to their circumstances but made clear that submission was not acceptable.
The speech was controversial. Frederick Douglass, then still a believer in moral suasion, opposed it, and the convention narrowly refused to endorse it. Garnet's wife, Julia Williams Garnet, also a leading abolitionist, helped write it. Garnet later came to support emigration and served as US minister to Liberia.
Legacy
Walker and Garnet shaped a tradition of Black radical and religious nationalism that runs through the twentieth century, including organizations like the Nation of Islam (4.9). Their arguments for self-defense and self-determination echo in later debates over nonviolence and Black Power.
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
Comparing strategies
Explain one difference between moral suasion and radical resistance as strategies to end slavery.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: Define moral suasion: persuading people through appeals to morality.
- Step 2: Define radical resistance: direct action by the enslaved, including violence if needed.
- Step 3: Use evidence: Garnet's 1843 address.
Answer: Model answer: Moral suasion tried to end slavery by persuading white Americans that it was morally wrong, through speeches, newspapers and petitions. Radical resistance called on enslaved people to free themselves through direct action, including violence if necessary, as Henry Highland Garnet urged in 1843 when he told them, 'Let your motto be resistance! resistance! RESISTANCE!'
Common mistakes
- Thinking all abolitionists agreed on tactics. Black abolitionists debated sharply over persuasion versus resistance.
- Saying Walker supported going back to Africa. He rejected colonization and claimed the US as Black Americans' home.
- Forgetting the religious side. Walker and Garnet framed resistance as a Christian duty.
On the exam
- Know the term moral suasion and be able to contrast it with radical resistance.
- Link this topic forward to the debate between nonviolence and self-defense in Unit 4 (4.6, 4.9).
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself
4 questions on 2.19 Black Political Thought: Radical Resistance. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
"America is more our country, than it is the whites--we have enriched it with our blood and tears. The greatest riches in all America have arisen from our blood and tears:--and will they drive us from our property and homes, which we have earned with our blood?"
David Walker, Appeal to the Coloured Citizens of the World, 3rd edition, 1830 (first published 1829)
In this excerpt, Walker is mainly arguing against
Southern officials tried hard to suppress Walker's Appeal after copies were smuggled into the South. The best explanation is that the pamphlet
"Brethren, arise, arise! Strike for your lives and liberties. Now is the day and the hour. Let every slave throughout the land do this, and the days of slavery are numbered. You cannot be more oppressed than you have been—you cannot suffer greater cruelties than you have already. Rather die freemen than live to be slaves."
Henry Highland Garnet, "An Address to the Slaves of the United States of America," delivered at the National Convention of Colored Citizens, Buffalo, New York, 1843
Garnet's address is best described as an example of
Earlier in the same address, Garnet praised Madison Washington. Washington was honored for
0 of 4 answered