Skip to main content

Unit 6 · Topic 6.6

6.6 The Rise of Industrial Capitalism

Business leaders created giant corporations and new ways to control whole industries, from vertical integration to trusts and holding companies, financed by bankers like J.P. Morgan. Their methods produced cheap goods and enormous fortunes, but also monopolies, wild boom-and-bust cycles and a fierce debate over whether they were robber barons or captains of industry.

Key terms

  • vertical integration
  • horizontal integration
  • trust
  • monopoly
  • Andrew Carnegie
  • John D. Rockefeller

Key vocabulary

TermWhat it meansClassic example
CorporationA business owned by stockholders, who can lose only what they investedMost big firms of the era
Vertical integrationControlling every stage of making a product, from raw materials to shippingCarnegie Steel owned iron mines, coal fields, ships and rail lines
Horizontal integrationBuying or merging with competitors in the same stage of an industryStandard Oil buying rival refineries
PoolAn agreement among competitors to split the market and fix pricesRailroad pools in the 1870s and 1880s
TrustStockholders in many companies hand control to one board of trusteesStandard Oil Trust (1882)
Holding companyA corporation that owns controlling stock in other companiesStandard Oil of New Jersey (1899)
MonopolyOne company controls nearly all of a marketStandard Oil in refining

Carnegie, Rockefeller and Morgan

Andrew Carnegie, a Scottish immigrant who started as a teenage telegraph messenger, built Carnegie Steel by adopting the Bessemer process, cutting costs relentlessly and owning every step of production. In 1901 he sold his company to J.P. Morgan for about $480 million, and Morgan combined it with other firms to create U.S. Steel, the first billion-dollar corporation.

John D. Rockefeller founded Standard Oil in 1870. He bought out or drove out competing refineries, used secret railroad rebates to undercut rivals, and by about 1880 controlled roughly 90 percent of American oil refining. In 1882 he organized the Standard Oil Trust to manage it all from one board.

J.P. Morgan was an investment banker. He raised money for corporations and reorganized failing railroads into larger, more stable systems, putting his partners on their boards. He became so powerful that in 1895, during the depression that began in 1893, his banking syndicate supplied gold to rescue the federal government's shrinking gold reserve.

Boom, bust and competition

The economy grew enormously overall, but it swung between booms and severe depressions, including the Panic of 1873 and the Panic of 1893, the worst until the 1930s. Prices generally fell through the period, partly because big firms produced so efficiently.

Business leaders disliked cutthroat competition because price wars could ruin everyone. Pools, trusts and mergers were ways to escape it. Critics saw these as conspiracies to raise prices and crush small businesses, which led to the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 (6.12). Courts weakened that law at first: in United States v. E.C. Knight Co. (1895) the Supreme Court ruled that a sugar-refining monopoly involved manufacturing, not interstate commerce, so the act did not apply.

Looking overseas

As production outgrew what Americans could buy, especially during depressions, businesses looked for foreign markets to sell to and raw materials to buy. Companies like Standard Oil and Singer sewing machines sold worldwide. This search for markets helps explain growing U.S. interest in Latin America, the Pacific and Asia (6.12, 7.2).

Robber barons or captains of industry?

Historians and Americans at the time disagreed sharply. The 'robber baron' view stresses ruthless tactics, political bribery, harsh labor practices and monopoly power. The 'captain of industry' view stresses efficiency, lower prices, jobs and philanthropy (6.10). Strong essays acknowledge both and use evidence for each side.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Arguing both sides with evidence

    Short-answer practice: Provide one piece of evidence that supports the view that Gilded Age business leaders were 'captains of industry,' and one that supports the view that they were 'robber barons.'

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: For each view, pick a specific, named example rather than a general claim.
    2. Step 2: Explain briefly how the evidence supports that view.
    3. Step 3: Keep the two parts clearly separate so a reader can award each point.

    Answer: Model answer: Supporting 'captains of industry': Andrew Carnegie's adoption of the Bessemer process and vertical integration drove down the price of steel, making cheap rails, bridges and buildings possible, and he later gave away most of his fortune to fund libraries. Supporting 'robber barons': John D. Rockefeller used secret railroad rebates and price-cutting to drive competitors out of business until Standard Oil controlled about 90 percent of oil refining, letting it limit competition across a whole industry.

Common mistakes

  • Swapping vertical and horizontal integration. Vertical = up and down the supply chain (Carnegie). Horizontal = across competitors (Rockefeller).
  • Assuming the Sherman Antitrust Act broke up trusts right away. Weak enforcement and the E.C. Knight decision made it ineffective until the Progressive Era.
  • Saying prices rose because of monopolies. In this period most prices actually fell, which helped consumers but hurt indebted farmers.

On the exam

  • Expect cartoons of monopolists as octopuses or giants. Identify the artist's point of view and connect it to calls for regulation.
  • The robber baron versus captain of industry debate makes a good complexity point in an essay: show you understand both interpretations.

Connected topics

Videos

  • The Rise of INDUSTRIAL CAPITALISM [APUSH Review]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The Industrial Economy: Crash Course US History #23

    CrashCourseWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The rise of industrial capitalism | AP US History | Khan Academy

    Khan AcademyWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • #60 - APUSH 6.6 The Rise of Industrial Capitalism [UPDATED]

    APUSH SlidesWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The Rise of Industrial Capitalism in Under 3 mins (APUSH Unit 6 Topic 6) 6.6

    Maximum InsightWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 6.6 The Rise of Industrial Capitalism. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Question 1 of 4

A steel company that buys iron mines, coal fields and the railroads that carry its products is practicing

Question 2 of 4

John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil gained control of about 90 percent of American oil refining by around 1880 mainly by

Source 1: "The problem of our age is the administration of wealth, so that the ties of brotherhood may still bind together the rich and poor in harmonious relationship. . . . This, then, is held to be the duty of the man of Wealth: First, to set an example of modest, unostentatious living, shunning display or extravagance; to provide moderately for the legitimate wants of those dependent upon him; and after doing so to consider all surplus revenues which come to him simply as trust funds, which he is called upon to administer . . . the man of wealth thus becoming the sole agent and trustee for his poorer brethren, bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience, and ability to administer—doing for them better than they would or could do for themselves."

Source 2: "Almost all legislative effort to prevent vice is really protective of vice, because all such legislation saves the vicious man from the penalty of his vice. Nature's remedies against vice are terrible. She removes the victims without pity. A drunkard in the gutter is just where he ought to be, according to the fitness and tendency of things."

Source 1: Andrew Carnegie, steel manufacturer, "Wealth," North American Review, June 1889. Source 2: William Graham Sumner, Yale professor of political and social science, What Social Classes Owe to Each Other, 1883.

Question 3 of 4

Carnegie and Sumner would most likely both have opposed

"Section 1. Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is hereby declared to be illegal. . . .

Section 2. Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor . . . ."

Source: An Act to Protect Trade and Commerce Against Unlawful Restraints and Monopolies (Sherman Antitrust Act), passed by Congress, July 2, 1890.

Question 4 of 4

Congress passed the law mainly in response to

0 of 4 answered