AP® United States History review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/us-history/units/4/4-13)
Unit 4 · Topic 4.13
4.13 The Society of the South in the Early Republic
Cotton became the South's main crop and the nation's leading export, and planters moved west into the Deep South, taking enslaved people with them. Most white Southerners did not own slaves, but a wealthy planter elite dominated politics and increasingly defended slavery as a 'positive good'.
Key terms
- King Cotton
- domestic slave trade
- planter elite
- yeoman farmers
- positive good argument
King Cotton
After the cotton gin (1793) made short-staple cotton profitable, cotton spread from Georgia and South Carolina into Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and later Texas. Demand from British and New England textile mills seemed endless. By the late 1830s cotton made up more than half the value of all US exports, and the South supplied most of the raw cotton used in British mills.
Southerners began speaking of 'King Cotton' because the crop seemed to rule the economy. Cotton profits flowed north too, to the banks, insurers, shippers and mill owners who financed, moved and spun it.
The domestic slave trade
Congress banned the importation of enslaved people from abroad beginning January 1, 1808. But the enslaved population kept growing through births, from about 900,000 in 1800 to about 2 million in 1830 and about 4 million by 1860.
As soil wore out in the Upper South (Virginia, Maryland, Kentucky) and cotton lands opened in the Deep South, about a million enslaved people were forcibly moved from the Upper South to the Lower South between 1790 and 1860. Many moved with migrating owners, but a large share were sold by traders, marched overland in chained groups called coffles or shipped to markets like New Orleans. Historians sometimes call this a 'Second Middle Passage'. It tore apart countless families.
The structure of white Southern society
Southern society was a pyramid. At the top was the planter elite. By 1860 only about one-quarter of white Southern families owned any enslaved people, and only about one in eight slaveholders owned 20 or more, a common definition of a planter. Yet this small group held most of the wealth and political power.
Most white Southerners were yeoman farmers, independent small farmers who owned their land, grew food for their families and perhaps some cotton, and owned few or no enslaved people. Below them were poor whites with little land.
Why did non-slaveholders support slavery? Many hoped to own enslaved people one day; slavery gave even poor whites a sense of racial status above Black people; they had family, church and business ties to planters; and they shared fears of slave revolt and of outside interference.
A distinct Southern culture and economy
- Less urban and less industrial than the North; capital was invested in land and enslaved people rather than factories.
- Fewer immigrants and weaker public school systems.
- A culture of personal honor, including dueling, and a paternalistic ideal in which planters claimed to care for enslaved people like children, a claim that hid brutal violence.
- Strong support for states' rights and opposition to protective tariffs (4.3, 4.8).
From 'necessary evil' to 'positive good'
In the founding era, many Southern leaders, including Jefferson, called slavery a regrettable 'necessary evil'. By the 1830s, faced with abolitionist attacks and slave revolts, many defended it as a 'positive good'. John C. Calhoun used that phrase in an 1837 Senate speech. Defenders claimed slavery was sanctioned by the Bible, that it was kinder than Northern wage labor, and that Black people were inferior and needed white control. These arguments were racist and false, but they shaped Southern politics and hardened sectional conflict.
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
Explaining a pattern
Short-answer practice: Briefly explain ONE reason most white Southerners supported slavery even though they did not own enslaved people.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: Acknowledge the fact: most white Southern families owned no enslaved people.
- Step 2: Give a specific reason.
- Step 3: Explain it clearly.
Answer: Model answer: Although most white Southern families did not own enslaved people, many yeoman farmers supported slavery because it gave them a sense of racial status above all Black people, and because many hoped to become slaveholders themselves as cotton made slavery the main path to wealth in the South.
Common mistakes
- Assuming most white Southerners owned enslaved people. About three-quarters of white families owned none by 1860.
- Thinking the 1808 ban on importation ended the slave trade. The domestic slave trade grew larger than ever.
- Treating the 'positive good' argument as the founders' view. It developed mainly in the 1830s, as a reaction to abolitionism.
On the exam
- Cotton links the regions: Southern cotton, grown by enslaved people, fed Northern and British factories. That connection is a strong point in market-revolution answers.
- Proslavery sources (Calhoun, later Fitzhugh) are common. Explain their arguments and the context of abolitionist pressure.
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself
4 questions on 4.13 The Society of the South in the Early Republic. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
Most white Southerners in the early 1800s owned no enslaved people. Which of the following best explains why many of them still supported slavery?
Source 1: "I hold that in the present state of civilization, where two races of different origin, and distinguished by color, and other physical differences, as well as intellectual, are brought together, the relation now existing in the slaveholding States between the two, is, instead of an evil, a good—a positive good. . . . I hold then, that there never has yet existed a wealthy and civilized society in which one portion of the community did not, in point of fact, live on the labor of the other."
Source 2: "I have often been utterly astonished, since I came to the north, to find persons who could speak of the singing, among slaves, as evidence of their contentment and happiness. It is impossible to conceive of a greater mistake. Slaves sing most when they are most unhappy. The songs of the slave represent the sorrows of his heart; and he is relieved by them, only as an aching heart is relieved by its tears."
Source 1: John C. Calhoun, senator from South Carolina, speech in the U.S. Senate, February 6, 1837. Source 2: Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himself, published by the Anti-Slavery Office in Boston, 1845.
Calhoun's argument in Source 1 reflects which shift in Southern defenses of slavery?
Calhoun's speech was most likely a response to
| Census year | Enslaved population of the United States |
|---|---|
| 1790 | 698,000 |
| 1800 | 894,000 |
| 1810 | 1,191,000 |
| 1820 | 1,538,000 |
| 1830 | 2,009,000 |
| 1840 | 2,487,000 |
| 1850 | 3,204,000 |
| 1860 | 3,954,000 |
Source: United States Census, 1790–1860. Figures rounded to the nearest thousand.
Congress banned the importation of enslaved people from abroad beginning in 1808. Based on the table, the enslaved population grew after 1808 mainly through
0 of 4 answered