Skip to main content

Unit 3 · Topic 3.12

3.12 Movement in the Early Republic

After the Revolution, American settlers poured across the Appalachian Mountains, while Native nations, Britain and Spain all tried to protect their own interests in the West. The federal government asserted control by defeating a Native confederacy and crushing the Whiskey Rebellion, and regional differences over slavery grew sharper.

Key terms

  • Battle of Fallen Timbers
  • Treaty of Greenville
  • Whiskey Rebellion
  • frontier culture
  • regional views of slavery

Moving west

Once the Proclamation of 1763 no longer applied, settlers flooded into Kentucky, Tennessee and the Ohio Valley, following routes like the Wilderness Road through the Cumberland Gap. Kentucky became a state in 1792 and Tennessee in 1796. New Englanders moved into upstate New York and Ohio.

Western settlers wanted cheap land, protection from Native nations and access to the Mississippi River and New Orleans to ship their crops. They often distrusted distant governments and Eastern elites, and many supported Jefferson's Democratic-Republicans.

Native nations and the Northwest Indian War

Native nations had not been part of the 1783 peace, and they did not accept that Britain could give away their land. Many shifted alliances among Britain (which still held forts in the Northwest), Spain (which controlled Florida and Louisiana), other Native nations and the United States, choosing whatever best protected their land. In the Southeast, the Creek leader Alexander McGillivray played Spain and the United States against each other.

In the Ohio Country, a Western Confederacy of nations including the Miami, Shawnee and Lenape resisted American settlement. Led by Little Turtle (Miami) and Blue Jacket (Shawnee), they defeated two American armies, including a crushing defeat of General Arthur St. Clair's force in 1791, one of the worst losses the US Army ever suffered against Native forces.

In 1794 General Anthony Wayne's army defeated the confederacy at the Battle of Fallen Timbers, near present-day Toledo, Ohio. The British, who had encouraged Native resistance, refused to help. In the Treaty of Greenville (1795), Native leaders gave up most of present-day Ohio in exchange for goods and yearly payments. Jay's Treaty, around the same time, got Britain to leave its northwestern forts.

The Whiskey Rebellion (1794)

Farmers in western Pennsylvania turned much of their grain into whiskey, which was easier to transport over the mountains and was often used as money. Hamilton's 1791 excise tax on whiskey hit them hard. In 1794 some attacked tax collectors and threatened Pittsburgh.

Washington called up about 13,000 militia and rode out with them himself. The rebellion collapsed without a battle. The episode showed that, unlike under the Articles during Shays' Rebellion, the new federal government could enforce its laws. It also deepened Western support for the Democratic-Republicans, who opposed the tax.

Regional views of slavery

While Northern states moved toward gradual emancipation (3.6), slavery grew in the South. The 1790 census counted about 700,000 enslaved people. Eli Whitney's cotton gin (1793) quickly separated seeds from short-staple cotton, which grew well across the inland South. Cotton suddenly became very profitable, and slavery spread with it into Georgia, the Carolina backcountry and later the Deep South (4.13).

The new government protected slavery in several ways. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 let owners capture people who had escaped to other states, and the Constitution's 1808 clause delayed any ban on the international slave trade. The growing gap between a North moving away from slavery and a South committing to it was the seed of later sectional conflict.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Explaining a turning point

    Short-answer practice: Briefly explain ONE way the Battle of Fallen Timbers (1794) affected Native nations in the Ohio Valley.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Describe the battle in one clause.
    2. Step 2: Name the treaty that followed and what it did.
    3. Step 3: Explain the effect on Native land and power.

    Answer: Model answer: After General Anthony Wayne's army defeated the Western Confederacy at Fallen Timbers, and the British refused to help their Native allies, Native leaders signed the Treaty of Greenville in 1795. They gave up most of present-day Ohio, which opened the region to a flood of American settlers and weakened Native power in the Ohio Valley.

Common mistakes

  • Confusing the Whiskey Rebellion (1794, federal tax, put down by Washington) with Shays' Rebellion (1786–1787, Massachusetts state taxes, under the Articles).
  • Thinking Native nations simply lost after 1783. They won major victories in 1790 and 1791 before Fallen Timbers.
  • Forgetting that the cotton gin (1793) expanded slavery rather than reducing the need for enslaved labor.

On the exam

  • Compare the Whiskey Rebellion and Shays' Rebellion to show how the federal government's power changed under the Constitution.
  • The cotton gin is a key causation example linking Period 3 to the growth of slavery in Period 4.

Connected topics

Videos

  • Westward Movement in the Early U.S. [APUSH Review]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • #27 - APUSH 3.12 Movement in the Early Republic [UPDATED]

    APUSH SlidesWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The Whiskey Rebellion (APUSH Period 3)

    Tom RicheyWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Movement in the Early Republic in Under 3 mins (APUSH Topic 3.12)

    Maximum InsightWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 3.12 Movement in the Early Republic. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Question 1 of 4

President Washington's response to the Whiskey Rebellion of 1794 most clearly demonstrated

"Art. 3. Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged. The utmost good faith shall always be observed towards the Indians; their lands and property shall never be taken from them without their consent; and, in their property, rights, and liberty, they shall never be invaded or disturbed, unless in just and lawful wars authorized by Congress . . . .

Art. 6. There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in the said territory, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes whereof the party shall have been duly convicted . . . ."

Source: An Ordinance for the Government of the Territory of the United States North West of the River Ohio, passed by the Confederation Congress, July 13, 1787.

Question 2 of 4

Which of the following developments of the 1790s most clearly contradicted the promise in Article 3?

"In contemplating the causes which may disturb our Union, it occurs as matter of serious concern that any ground should have been furnished for characterizing parties by geographical discriminations, Northern and Southern, Atlantic and Western . . . . The inhabitants of our Western country have lately had a useful lesson on this head; they have seen . . . in the unanimous ratification by the Senate, of the treaty with Spain . . . a decisive proof how unfounded were the suspicions propagated among them . . . .

The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop."

Source: George Washington, Farewell Address, published in American newspapers, September 1796.

Question 3 of 4

The "treaty with Spain" that Washington mentions most directly benefited

"What attachment can a poor European emigrant have for a country where he had nothing? . . . his country is now that which gives him land, bread, protection, and consequence: Ubi panis ibi patria [Where there is bread, there is my country], is the motto of all emigrants."

"What then is the American, this new man? He is either an European, or the descendant of an European, hence that strange mixture of blood, which you will find in no other country. I could point out to you a family whose grandfather was an Englishman, whose wife was Dutch, whose son married a French woman, and whose present four sons have now four wives of different nations. He is an American, who, leaving behind him all his ancient prejudices and manners, receives new ones from the new mode of life he has embraced, the new government he obeys, and the new rank he holds. . . . Here individuals of all nations are melted into a new race of men . . . ."

Source: J. Hector St. John de Crèvecoeur, French-born farmer who settled in New York, Letters from an American Farmer, written mostly before the Revolution and published in London in 1782.

Question 4 of 4

The first paragraph best helps explain which development of the late 1700s?

0 of 4 answered