AP® Statistics review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/stats/units/4/4-3)
Unit 4 · Topic 4.3
4.3 Justifying a Claim Based on a Confidence Interval for a Population Mean or Population Mean Difference
Interpreting a t-interval works just like interpreting a proportion interval: a range of plausible values for μ or μd, a confidence level that describes the method, and a way to judge claims. Sample size and confidence level change the width the same way too.
Key terms
- interpreting a confidence interval
- confidence level
- plausible values
- margin of error
Interpreting the interval
Template: "We are C% confident that the interval from a to b captures the true mean [variable] for [population]." For the sleep example: "We are 95% confident that the interval from 6.24 to 7.36 hours captures the true mean sleep on school nights for all students at the school."
For matched pairs, name the mean difference and its order: "…captures the true mean improvement (after − before) in practice test score."
The interval comes from a sample, so it may or may not contain μ. That uncertainty is why you say "confident."
Interpreting the confidence level
"If we took many random samples of 20 students and built a 95% t-interval from each, about 95% of those intervals would capture the true mean sleep for all students at the school." The 95% is a success rate for the method.
Using the interval to judge claims
Values inside are plausible; values outside aren't. If the school nurse claims students average 8 hours of sleep, the interval (6.24, 7.36) says that's not plausible: 8 is above the whole interval. A claim of 7 hours is plausible.
For paired data, check whether 0 is in the interval. The improvement interval (1.60, 10.15) is entirely above 0, so it gives convincing evidence that the review session raises scores on average. If 0 were inside, "no improvement" would be plausible.
What changes the width
To plan a margin of error, remember that quadrupling the sample size roughly halves the width.
- Higher confidence level: larger t*, larger margin of error, wider interval.
- Larger sample: smaller SE (s/√n) and slightly smaller t* (more df), so a narrower interval. Width is roughly proportional to 1/√n.
- More variable data (larger s): wider interval.
Planning a smaller margin of error
The sleep interval had margin of error 0.56 hours with n = 20. With the same s = 1.2 and n = 80 (four times as many students), SE = 1.2/√80 ≈ 0.134 and t* ≈ 1.990 (df = 79), so the margin of error drops to about 0.27 hours, roughly half. It's a bit less than half because t* also shrinks as df grows.
The interval and a two-sided test agree: a 95% interval contains exactly the values of μ₀ that a two-sided test at α = 0.05 would not reject.
Interval about a mean, not individuals
The interval estimates the population mean. It does not say 95% of students sleep between 6.24 and 7.36 hours. Individual students vary far more than that (the sample standard deviation was 1.2 hours).
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1Calculator allowed
Evaluate claims with an interval
A 95% interval for the mean amount of soda in a brand's 355 mL cans, from a random sample of 40 cans, is (351.2, 354.6) mL. Does the interval support the company's claim that the mean is 355 mL? What about a claim that cans are underfilled on average?
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: 355 is above the whole interval, so 355 mL is not a plausible value for the true mean.
- Step 2: Every plausible value is below 355, which is convincing evidence that the true mean fill is less than 355 mL.
- Step 3: Underfilled on average is supported. (Whether 1 to 4 mL matters is a practical question.)
Answer: The 355 mL claim is not plausible. The interval gives convincing evidence that the cans are underfilled on average, by about 0.4 to 3.8 mL.
- Example 2Calculator allowed
Trap: interpreting as individual values
A student interprets the sleep interval as: "95% of students at the school sleep between 6.24 and 7.36 hours." Correct it.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: The interval is an estimate of the mean, one number for the whole population.
- Step 2: It says nothing about the share of individual students in that range.
- Step 3: Correct: "We are 95% confident that the interval from 6.24 to 7.36 hours captures the true mean sleep for all students at the school."
Answer: The interval estimates the population mean, not where 95% of individual students fall.
Common mistakes
- Interpreting the interval as a range for individual values or for x̄.
- Saying there's a 95% probability that μ is in one particular interval.
- Forgetting the order of subtraction when interpreting a paired interval.
- Concluding the mean equals a claimed value just because the value is inside the interval.
On the exam
- Expect to interpret both the interval and the confidence level, often in the same question. Keep the two templates separate.
- When using an interval to judge a claim, say whether the claimed value is inside or outside the interval and what that means in context.
Connected topics
- Unit 33.4 Justifying a Claim Based on a Confidence Interval for a Population Proportion
- Unit 44.2 Constructing a Confidence Interval for a Population Mean or Population Mean Difference
- Unit 44.5 Carrying Out a Test for a Population Mean or Population Mean Difference
- Unit 44.8 Justifying a Claim Based on a Confidence Interval for the Difference Between Two Population Means
Videos
Check yourself
4 questions on 4.3 Justifying a Claim Based on a Confidence Interval for a Population Mean or Population Mean Difference. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
A 95% confidence interval for a population mean is computed from a random sample of 20. Which change would most likely produce a narrower interval?
A company claims its light bulbs last 1,200 hours on average. A 95% confidence interval for the mean life, from a random sample, is (1,138, 1,191) hours. What does the interval suggest?
A 95% confidence interval for the mean weight of a type of cereal box is (452.6, 461.4) grams. What are the point estimate and the margin of error?
A random sample of 50 high school students gives a 95% confidence interval of (6.1, 7.0) hours for the mean nightly sleep of all students at the school. A student says, "95% of students at the school sleep between 6.1 and 7.0 hours." What's wrong with this statement?
0 of 4 answered