AP® Psychology review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/psych/units/2/2-6)
Unit 2 · Topic 2.6
2.6 Retrieving Memories
Retrieval is getting information back out of memory, either by recall with no hints or by recognition with cues. You remember better when your surroundings, mood or physical state match those when you learned. Retrieval practice, including self-testing (the testing effect) and good metacognition, makes memories stronger.
Key terms
- recall
- recognition
- retrieval cue
- context-dependent memory
- mood-congruent and state-dependent memory
- testing effect
Recall versus recognition
Recall means retrieving information without cues, as on a fill-in-the-blank or essay question ('Name the four lobes of the cortex'). Recognition means identifying information when you see it, as on a multiple-choice question ('Which of these is a lobe of the cortex?'). Recognition is usually easier because the answer itself acts as a retrieval cue.
A retrieval cue is anything that helps you access a stored memory: a smell, a word, a place or a feeling. Memories are stored in webs of associations, and a cue activates part of the web, which helps bring up the rest. This is one reason priming (2.2) works.
Matching conditions: context, mood and state
The common thread is that the conditions at encoding become retrieval cues. Matching them gives you more cues. Since you usually can't study in the exact room where you'll take a test, a good workaround is to study in several different places, so your memory doesn't depend on one setting.
- Context-dependent memory: you recall information better in the same physical environment where you learned it. In one classic study, divers who learned words underwater recalled more underwater, and those who learned on land recalled more on land.
- State-dependent memory: you recall better when you're in the same internal physical state as when you learned, such as being caffeinated or tired. Information learned while drinking alcohol is recalled better when drinking again, though it's also learned poorly in the first place.
- Mood-congruent memory: your current mood makes it easier to recall memories that match it. When you're sad, sad memories come to mind more easily, which can keep a low mood going.
Retrieval practice and metacognition
The testing effect is the finding that practicing retrieval, by quizzing yourself, makes memories stronger than spending the same time rereading. Each time you pull a memory out, you strengthen the pathway to it. Flashcards, practice questions and closing your notes and writing what you remember are all retrieval practice.
Metacognition means thinking about your own thinking: judging what you know, what you don't and which strategies work for you. Students often feel they know material after rereading it because it looks familiar, but recognizing something isn't the same as being able to recall it. Self-testing gives you accurate feedback, so you can spend time on what you actually don't know.
Putting it into practice
The best study plans combine retrieval and encoding research: space your sessions out (2.4), quiz yourself instead of rereading, process material for meaning, and check your understanding honestly. These strategies take more effort and feel harder in the moment, but that effort is what builds stronger memories.
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
Interpreting a 2 × 2 context experiment
Students learn 40 words either in a classroom or in a gym, then are tested either in the same room or in the other room. Mean words recalled: learned in classroom and tested in classroom, 18; learned in classroom and tested in gym, 12; learned in gym and tested in gym, 17; learned in gym and tested in classroom, 11. What do the results show?
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: Group the conditions by whether the learning and testing rooms matched. Matched: 18 and 17. Mismatched: 12 and 11.
- Step 2: Average them: matched (18 + 17) ÷ 2 = 17.5 words; mismatched (12 + 11) ÷ 2 = 11.5 words.
- Step 3: Recall is about 6 words higher when the rooms match, whichever room was used. That pattern is context-dependent memory.
- Step 4: Note that the room itself doesn't matter much: classroom-only and gym-only scores are similar. What matters is the match.
Answer: Recall was higher when the testing room matched the learning room (mean 17.5 versus 11.5 words), supporting context-dependent memory.
- Example 2
Which retrieval concept?
Identify the concept. (a) After her grandmother's funeral, Rosa keeps remembering other sad times. (b) Zack studies with coffee and does better on tests when he also drinks coffee beforehand. (c) Mina answers multiple-choice questions on presidents easily but struggles to list them from memory.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: (a) Rosa's sad mood brings up sad memories: mood-congruent memory.
- Step 2: (b) Zack's physical state (caffeinated) matches at study and test: state-dependent memory.
- Step 3: (c) Multiple choice provides cues; listing doesn't. That shows recognition is easier than recall.
Answer: (a) Mood-congruent memory, (b) state-dependent memory, (c) recognition versus recall.
Common mistakes
- Mixing up state-dependent and mood-congruent memory. State-dependent is about matching your physical state at learning and recall; mood-congruent is about your current mood bringing up memories that match it.
- Thinking rereading is as good as self-testing. The testing effect shows active retrieval builds stronger memories.
- Calling multiple-choice questions recall. They test recognition, because the answer is in front of you.
On the exam
- Expect experiments with tables or graphs comparing study or test conditions; describe which group did better and connect the difference to the right concept.
- Evidence-based free-response questions on studying often reward naming the testing effect, spacing or context-dependent memory and explaining exactly why it helps.
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself
4 questions on 2.6 Retrieving Memories. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
| Scent while learning | Scent while testing | Mean words recalled (out of 30) |
|---|---|---|
| Peppermint | Peppermint | 18 |
| Peppermint | None | 13 |
| None | Peppermint | 13 |
| None | None | 17 |
Hypothetical experiment; students were randomly assigned to one of four groups, learned 30 words and wrote down as many as they could
Which conclusion is best supported by the data?
What was the mean number of words recalled across the two groups whose scent at testing matched their scent at learning?
During a week when he feels down, Theo finds that memories of past disappointments keep coming to mind, while happy memories feel harder to reach. This pattern best illustrates
Students who memorized a list after drinking coffee recalled more of it a day later if they drank coffee again before the test than if they did not. This result best illustrates
0 of 4 answered