AP® English Language and Composition review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/lang/units/2/2-4)
Unit 2 · Topic 2.4
2.4 Is the evidence enough?
Evidence is sufficient when there's enough of it, and it's strong enough, to support the claim. A big claim needs more and better support than a narrow one, and weak, outdated or one-sided evidence can make readers doubt the whole argument.
Key terms
- sufficient evidence
- relevant evidence
- credibility
- bias
Quantity and quality
Sufficient evidence has two parts. Quantity: is there enough of it to support a claim this size? Quality: is each piece relevant, accurate and trustworthy? A pile of weak evidence isn't sufficient, and neither is one perfect example asked to carry a sweeping claim.
Quality checks
Credibility gets extra attention on the synthesis essay, where each source comes with a short description of who wrote it and where it appeared. A study from a research group, an opinion piece by an interested party and a company's advertisement can all be useful, but not in the same way, and Unit 6 covers how to weigh them. Whatever the source, check whether it actually says what you need it to say.
- Relevant: does it actually connect to this claim, not just the general topic?
- Specific: does it name people, places, numbers or details, or is it vague?
- Credible: who produced it, and do they have the knowledge and fairness to be trusted?
- Current: is it recent enough for the question? Data on teen phone use from 2005 tells you little about today.
- Representative: does it reflect the usual case, or is it an unusual exception?
- Accurate: is it quoted or reported correctly, without stretching what it says?
Match the size of the claim to the evidence
How much evidence is enough depends on how much the claim promises. "Some students at my school would use a later bus" needs little support. "Every school in the country should change its bus schedule" needs a great deal. When evidence falls short, you have two honest options: find more and better evidence, or narrow the claim until the evidence you have can carry it. Qualifying a claim this way is covered in Unit 7.
Variety helps too. Three anecdotes about the same kind of person are weaker than an anecdote, a statistic and an expert's view that all point the same way.
When evidence fails
Insufficient evidence costs a writer twice. The claim isn't proven, and readers start to doubt the writer's judgment, so even the good parts of the argument lose force. That's why reading questions sometimes ask which added detail would most strengthen a paragraph, or what a writer's evidence fails to show.
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
Diagnosing and fixing insufficient evidence
Practice draft (written for this page; the survey is invented for practice): "Phones should be banned in every classroom in America. Last week, my friend got a text during a quiz and lost focus. Clearly, phones destroy students' learning." Explain why the evidence is insufficient, then revise the paragraph so the claim and evidence match.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: Measure the claim: "every classroom in America" and "destroy" make it enormous.
- Step 2: Measure the evidence: one anecdote about one student on one day. It's relevant, but it isn't representative, and it's far too little for a national claim.
- Step 3: Choose a fix. Narrow the claim to the writer's own school, and add different kinds of evidence a student could actually gather, such as a class survey and a teacher's observation.
- Step 4: Keep the anecdote, but let it illustrate a pattern rather than stand in for proof.
Answer: Revised paragraph: Our school should require phones to stay in lockers during class. In a survey our class ran of 120 students (practice data, written for this page), 71 said they check their phones at least once during a typical lesson. Ms. Ortiz, who teaches chemistry, says she now spends the first minutes of each lab collecting phones so students will follow safety steps. My friend's experience shows what those numbers look like: a single text during last week's quiz pulled her attention away for the rest of the period. A narrower claim, backed by a survey, a teacher's view and an example, gives readers far more reason to agree than one story asked to prove a national rule.
Common mistakes
- Thinking more quotations automatically means stronger evidence. Three weak quotations are still weak.
- Using only one kind of evidence, such as only personal stories, for a broad claim.
- Leaving the claim huge when the evidence is small. Narrowing the claim is often the smartest fix.
- Ignoring the date or source of evidence, especially statistics.
On the exam
- Writing questions may ask whether a writer should add or delete a sentence and why. Choose the answer that names what the evidence does or fails to do for the claim.
- In all three essays, the top of Row B requires specific evidence that supports all of your claims. A paragraph with a claim and no real evidence pulls your score down.
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself
4 questions on 2.4 Is the evidence enough?. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
Written for this practice set: a student's draft of an argument essay answering the question, "Should high schools require community service for graduation?"
A reader might say that paragraph 2 rests on a single experience. Which addition would best address this concern?
The writer wants to make sentence 9 more convincing. Which revision best accomplishes this goal?
Mary Wollstonecraft, an English writer and teacher, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792), from the introduction. Many popular books of the time, most of them written by men, advised that girls be educated mainly to please. Some text is omitted between paragraphs 1 and 2.
Wollstonecraft supports her conclusion in paragraph 1 mainly with
A skeptical reader might argue that the evidence in paragraph 1 is not sufficient because it
0 of 4 answered