Skip to main content

Synthesis essay

Limiting visitors at crowded national parks

  • Units 6 and 7
  • 6 points
  • About 55 minutes

You read six sources on one issue, including two visuals with at least one chart or table, and write an argument that takes your own position and uses evidence from at least three of the sources. On this site a data table stands in for a visual source. On the exam: Question 1 of 3, required. Section II has 3 essays in 2 hours 15 minutes, including a 15-minute reading period, and is 55% of the score; each essay is worth 6 points on the same analytic rubric (thesis 1, evidence and commentary 4, sophistication 1). The exam is fully digital in Bluebook. Recommended: the 15-minute reading period for the sources, then about 40 minutes to write.

The question and its sources

Suggested time: 15 minutes to read the sources and plan, then 40 minutes to write.

Visits to the most popular U.S. national parks have grown sharply in recent decades, bringing traffic jams, full parking lots and crowded trails in peak season. In recent years, several heavily visited parks have tested timed-entry reservation systems that limit how many vehicles may enter during the busiest hours.

Read the six sources below carefully, including the introductory information for each one.

Source A (Muir)

The following is excerpted from Our National Parks, a book published in 1901 by the naturalist John Muir, who campaigned for the creation and protection of national parks.

The tendency nowadays to wander in wildernesses is delightful to see. Thousands of tired, nerve-shaken, over-civilized people are beginning to find out that going to the mountains is going home; that wildness is a necessity; and that mountain parks and reservations are useful not only as fountains of timber and irrigating rivers, but as fountains of life. Awakening from the stupefying effects of the vice of over-industry and the deadly apathy of luxury, they are trying as best they can to mix and enrich their own little ongoings with those of Nature, and to get rid of rust and disease. Briskly venturing and roaming, some are washing off sins and cobweb cares of the devil’s spinning in all-day storms on mountains; sauntering in rosiny pinewoods or in gentian meadows, brushing through chaparral, bending down and parting sweet, flowery sprays; tracing rivers to their sources, getting in touch with the nerves of Mother Earth; jumping from rock to rock, feeling the life of them, learning the songs of them, panting in whole-souled exercise, and rejoicing in deep, long-drawn breaths of pure wildness. This is fine and natural and full of promise. So also is the growing interest in the care and preservation of forests and wild places in general, and in the half wild parks and gardens of towns. Even the scenery habit in its most artificial forms, mixed with spectacles, silliness, and kodaks; its devotees arrayed more gorgeously than scarlet tanagers, frightening the wild game with red umbrellas,—even this is encouraging, and may well be regarded as a hopeful sign of the times.

Source: John Muir, Our National Parks (1901), chapter I, “The Wild Parks and Forest Reservations of the West.” Public domain; text from Project Gutenberg eBook #60929.

Source B (Castillo)

The following is excerpted from a statement by the superintendent of a heavily visited national park, announcing a timed-entry pilot program.

On a July Saturday last year, the line of cars at our east entrance stretched four miles. Every parking area in the valley was full by 8:15 a.m. Visitors circled for hours, parked on fragile meadows, and left trash and human waste along trails that were never built for such numbers. Rangers spent their days directing traffic instead of teaching visitors about the park.

Our pilot does not close the park. From late May to mid-October, visitors entering during peak hours will reserve a one-hour entry window. Anyone may enter without a reservation before 6 a.m. or after 3 p.m., and visitors with campground or lodging reservations are exempt. Our goal is not to keep people out of their parks. It is to make sure that what people come for, whether quiet, wildlife or a trail they can actually walk, is still here when they arrive.

Source: Written for this practice set; the writer and publication are invented.

Source C (Park data): Peak-season averages for one national park before and during a timed-entry pilot

MeasurePeak season before the pilotPeak season during the pilot
Vehicles entering per day6,9005,600
Wait at the entrance station52 minutes9 minutes
Time the main parking areas filled8:15 a.m.10:40 a.m.
Visitors rating crowding a 'serious problem'61%24%
Reported wildlife–vehicle incidents (whole season)4729
Lodging occupancy in the nearest town (July)96%89%

Source: Hypothetical data, written for this practice set.

Source D (Brandt)

The following is excerpted from an interview with the owner of a family-run outfitter and café in a town just outside a national park.

Half my customers used to be people who decided at breakfast to drive up to the park. Now they check the website, see there are no slots left, and go somewhere else. Not to my town, not to my café. My July sales were down eighteen percent.

The park says you can still come in before six or after three. Tell that to a family with a toddler driving in from four hours away. The reservation system works fine for people who plan everything months ahead. It doesn't work for the spontaneous trip, and the spontaneous trip is a lot of what keeps this town alive.

Source: Written for this practice set; the writer and publication are invented.

Source E (Nwosu)

The following is excerpted from an article in a magazine about public lands.

Reservation systems are often described as neutral: first come, first served. But 'first' is not neutral. Popular entry windows can be gone minutes after they open online. People with fast internet, flexible jobs and the ability to plan a vacation months ahead have a head start. Families who work hourly shifts, or who live in rural areas with poor connections, do not.

National parks belong to everyone, and their visitors have long been less diverse than the country as a whole. A system that limits crowds should not make that worse. Some parks hold back a share of reservations until the day before, or use lotteries instead of a race to the keyboard. Those choices matter as much as the limit itself.

Source: Written for this practice set; the writer and publication are invented.

Source F (Cartoon)

This source is an editorial cartoon, described here in words.

A line of cars and RVs, bumper to bumper, winds up a mountain road across the whole panel. At the far end, a wooden park sign reads 'Welcome! Escape the Crowds.' In the foreground, a driver leans out of his window and calls to the driver of the next car: 'Are we in nature yet?'

Source: A visual source described in words; written for this practice set.

Suggested time: 55 minutes

Your answers are saved in this browser as you type.

Something wrong with this question?

What's wrong?

Please don't include personal details.

The essay

6 points

Write an essay that synthesizes material from at least three of the sources and develops your position on whether the most crowded national parks should limit the number of visitors through reservation systems. In your response you should do the following: • Write a thesis that takes a defensible position on the question. • Use evidence from at least three of the six sources to support your line of reasoning. Make clear which sources you use, by quoting, paraphrasing or summarizing them; you may cite them as Source A, Source B and so on, or by the descriptions in parentheses. • Explain how that evidence supports your line of reasoning. • Use grammar and punctuation that make your argument clear.

0 words · 0 / 12,000 characters

Checking scoring…

Scoring it yourself shows you the rubric, examples and a model answer. Try writing your answer first.