AP® Human Geography review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/geo/units/6/6-11)
Unit 6 · Topic 6.11
6.11 Challenges of Urban Sustainability
Growing cities face sprawl, gaps in sanitation, poor air and water quality, heavy energy use, climate risks like flooding and extreme heat, and a large ecological footprint. Responses include regional planning, urban growth boundaries, brownfield cleanup and farmland protection, and each has supporters and critics.
Key terms
- ecological footprint
- urban growth boundary
- brownfield
- sanitation
- farmland protection
The challenges
- Sprawl: low-density growth spreads cities over farmland and natural land, increases driving and makes services more expensive to provide.
- Sanitation: in many fast-growing cities, sewer and waste systems can't keep up, so untreated waste reaches rivers and spreads disease.
- Air and water quality: traffic, industry and burning fuels pollute the air, as in Delhi, India, where winter smog is a major health threat. Runoff from streets and parking lots pollutes rivers.
- Water supply: Cape Town, South Africa, came close to running dry in 2018 during a severe drought, and Mexico City has pumped so much groundwater that parts of the city are sinking.
- Energy use: cities use most of the world's energy for buildings, transportation and industry.
- Climate change: coastal cities face sea-level rise and flooding, and pavement and buildings trap heat, creating urban heat islands several degrees warmer than the countryside. Jakarta faces both flooding and sinking land, one reason Indonesia began building a new capital, Nusantara, on Borneo.
The ecological footprint
A city's ecological footprint is the area of productive land and water needed to supply its resources (food, water, energy, materials) and absorb its waste, including carbon emissions. A large city's footprint is many times larger than the city itself, because it draws food, water and energy from far away. Wealthy, high-consuming cities tend to have larger footprints per person than poorer ones.
Responses
- Regional planning: coordinating transportation, housing and land use across many local governments in a metro area, instead of each town acting alone.
- Urban growth boundaries (UGBs): legal lines that separate land where urban development is allowed from farmland and forest outside it. Oregon's 1973 land-use law required them, and the Portland area's boundary dates from 1979.
- Brownfield remediation and redevelopment: cleaning up old industrial sites contaminated by pollution, then reusing them. The U.S. EPA estimates there are more than 450,000 brownfields nationwide. Atlanta's Atlantic Station was built on the site of a former steel mill.
- Farmland protection: buying development rights from farmers or zoning land for agriculture only, as in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.
- Green infrastructure: parks, street trees, green roofs and wetlands that absorb stormwater and cool the city.
Weighing the responses
Each response has trade-offs. Portland's growth boundary has protected farmland and encouraged denser neighborhoods, but critics argue it limited land for housing and contributed to rising prices. Brownfield cleanups reuse land and remove pollution, but they're expensive, and new development can raise nearby rents and displace residents. Farmland protection keeps local agriculture alive but can push development farther out. Strong answers name a response, explain how it works, and weigh at least one cost.
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
Evaluating a response
Explain one way an urban growth boundary can reduce sprawl, and one possible negative consequence.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: Define the tool: a legal line beyond which urban development is restricted.
- Step 2: Explain the benefit: growth is redirected inward to infill and denser building, protecting outside farmland.
- Step 3: Explain a cost: with less land available, housing prices can rise.
Answer: Model answer: An urban growth boundary, like the one around Portland, Oregon, limits development outside a set line, so new homes and businesses are built on vacant or underused land inside the city, which protects farmland and reduces sprawl. However, by limiting the supply of buildable land, it can drive up land and housing prices, making the city less affordable.
Common mistakes
- Mixing up brownfields and greenfields. Brownfields are old, often polluted industrial sites; greenfields are undeveloped land.
- Defining the ecological footprint as the city's area. It's the much larger area needed to supply the city's resources and absorb its waste.
- Describing a response without any drawback. The CED expects you to know that these policies have both supporters and critics.
On the exam
- Expect to name an urban sustainability challenge, explain its cause and suggest a response.
- Use specific policy names (urban growth boundary, brownfield redevelopment, farmland protection) and real places.
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself
5 questions on 6.11 Challenges of Urban Sustainability. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
Since the late 1970s, the Portland, Oregon, metro area has used a line around its urban area beyond which most new development is restricted. This policy is
A city cleans up the soil at an abandoned rail yard and builds housing and a park on the site. This project redevelops a
A city's ecological footprint is best described as the
| Location | Tree canopy cover (%) | Surface temperature on a summer afternoon (°C) |
|---|---|---|
| Downtown core | 8 | 49 |
| Older neighborhood with mature trees | 38 | 36 |
| Newer suburb | 15 | 44 |
| Large city park | 65 | 31 |
| Rural farmland outside the city | 5 | 38 |
Hypothetical satellite-based measurements for one city
Which conclusion is best supported by the data for locations inside the city?
The rural farmland has little tree cover but is much cooler than downtown. Which factor best explains this?
0 of 5 answered