Skip to main content

Unit 2 · Topic 2.7

2.7 Population Policies

Governments try to shape population size and makeup through three kinds of policies: pronatalist policies that encourage births, antinatalist policies that discourage them, and immigration policies. These policies often have effects nobody planned.

Key terms

  • pronatalist policy
  • antinatalist policy
  • immigration policy
  • quota

Antinatalist policies

Antinatalist policies aim to lower birth rates, usually because a government fears population growth will outrun jobs, housing or food.

China's one-child policy is the best-known example. It ran from 1980 to 2015 and limited most urban couples to one child, with exceptions such as some rural families and ethnic minorities. It was enforced through fines, pressure and, in many cases, forced abortions and sterilizations. China allowed two children starting in 2016 and three in 2021, and it now encourages larger families.

Other examples: Singapore's “Stop at Two” campaign in the 1970s used housing and school incentives. India promoted family planning, and during the 1975–77 Emergency millions of sterilizations were carried out, many under coercion, which caused a strong public backlash.

Pronatalist policies

Pronatalist policies aim to raise birth rates, usually in aging countries worried about labor shortages and paying for pensions. Tools include paid parental leave, child allowances, subsidized child care, tax breaks and housing help.

France has long offered generous family benefits and child care. Sweden gives parents 480 days of paid parental leave per child to share. Hungary has exempted mothers of four or more children from income tax for life since 2020, and Russia has paid “maternity capital” to families since 2007. Singapore reversed course in 1987 and began encouraging larger families.

Pronatalist policies usually have modest effects. The costs of raising children, housing prices and the challenge of combining careers with family often matter more than one-time payments. South Korea has spent heavily on incentives, yet its fertility rate is still among the lowest in the world.

Immigration policies

Immigration policies control who can move into a country and how many. A quota sets a maximum number of immigrants, sometimes by country of origin. The U.S. Immigration Act of 1924 set national-origin quotas that favored northern and western Europeans; the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 replaced them with a system based on family ties and skills.

A points-based system scores applicants on factors like education, work experience, age and language skills. Canada has used one since 1967, and Australia uses one too. Some countries also run guest worker programs that let people work for a set time without settling permanently (topic 2.11).

Unintended consequences

  • China's one-child policy, together with a cultural preference for sons, contributed to a sex ratio imbalance, with millions more young men than women.
  • Sharp drops in births create rapidly aging populations, as China now faces, with fewer workers supporting more retirees.
  • Strict limits on immigration can deepen labor shortages in aging countries, while rapid immigration can create political debate over jobs, housing and culture.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Explaining a policy choice

    Explain why a country with a total fertility rate of 1.3 and a growing share of people over 65 might adopt a pronatalist policy.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Interpret the data: a TFR of 1.3 is well below replacement (about 2.1), so each generation will be smaller than the last.
    2. Step 2: Connect to aging: fewer births and longer lives mean a growing share of retirees and a shrinking working-age population.
    3. Step 3: State the problem the policy targets: fewer workers paying taxes to fund pensions and health care for more older people.
    4. Step 4: Name the policy and goal: paid parental leave or child payments aim to make having children more affordable, raising the birth rate over time.

    Answer: Because its fertility is far below replacement and its population is aging, the country will have fewer workers to support more retirees. A pronatalist policy like paid parental leave or child payments tries to raise births and rebuild the future workforce.

Common mistakes

  • Mixing up the terms. Pro- means for, so pronatalist encourages births; anti- means against.
  • Assuming policies always work. Many pronatalist policies raise births only slightly.
  • Forgetting that immigration policy is a population policy too.

On the exam

  • Questions often describe a policy and ask you to classify it, or ask you to explain its intended and unintended effects.
  • China is the most common example. Know that the one-child policy ran from 1980 to 2015, then two children were allowed from 2016 and three from 2021.

Connected topics

Videos

  • Government Policies and Population Growth [AP Human Geography Review Unit 2 Topic 7]

    Mr. SinnWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Population POLICIES, Explained [AP Human Geography Review—Unit 2 Topic 7]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Why China's population is shrinking

    VoxWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • 2.7 Population Policies (Unit 2 Population & Migration: Topic 7 of AP Human Geography)

    Brad CoulterWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Population Policies

    Matt Poleski - AP Human GeographyWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 2.7 Population Policies. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Question 1 of 4

In the 1970s, Singapore ran a 'Stop at Two' campaign that gave benefits to small families. By 1987, with fertility well below replacement level, the government began encouraging couples to have three or more children if they could afford it. This change shows a shift from

Question 2 of 4

China began allowing all couples to have two children in 2016 and three children in 2021. Which of the following best explains why the government made these changes?

"The annual quota of any nationality shall be 2 per centum of the number of foreign-born individuals of such nationality resident in continental United States as determined by the United States census of 1890, but the minimum quota of any nationality shall be 100."

Immigration Act of 1924, Section 11(a), United States Congress

Question 3 of 4

The quota system described in the excerpt is best classified as

Question 4 of 4

Lawmakers based the quotas on the 1890 census rather than a more recent one. The most likely effect of this choice was to

0 of 4 answered