Skip to main content

Unit 4 · Topic 4.4

4.4 18th-Century Society and Demographics

Europe's population grew steadily in the 1700s as famines eased, plague disappeared and some diseases were fought more effectively. Family life was shaped by late marriage and small households, attitudes toward children shifted, and growing cities faced visible poverty and crime.

Key terms

  • Agricultural Revolution
  • population growth
  • inoculation
  • European marriage pattern
  • urbanization
  • nuclear family

Why population grew

Historians estimate Europe's population rose from roughly 120 million around 1700 to roughly 180–190 million by 1800. This was the first sustained growth that didn't end in a crash.

  • Food: the Agricultural Revolution and American crops like the potato and maize raised harvests (see 3.3).
  • Transport: better roads and canals moved grain to places with poor harvests, and some governments stored grain, so local crop failures killed fewer people.
  • Plague: its last major outbreak in western Europe struck Marseille in 1720. Quarantines and the Habsburg military border with the Ottomans may have helped.
  • Inoculation: deliberately infecting a person with a mild case of smallpox to give immunity. Lady Mary Wortley Montagu promoted it in England after seeing it in the Ottoman Empire. Edward Jenner's safer cowpox vaccine came in 1796.
FactorEffect on death rate
More and better foodFewer famine deaths, better resistance to disease
End of plague in the westRemoved a major killer
InoculationFewer smallpox deaths
Medicine in generalStill limited; hospitals could spread disease

Marriage and family

The European marriage pattern continued in the northwest. People married in their mid-twenties, set up nuclear households of parents and children, and often worked as servants first to save money. Late marriage limited family size, and some couples, especially in France by the late 1700s, deliberately limited births.

Some historians argue that marriage became more companionate, based on affection and partnership, especially among the middle classes, though economic considerations still mattered a lot. In the later 1700s, births outside marriage rose in many places, perhaps because more young people moved for work away from village oversight.

Childhood

Death rates for babies stayed high; in many places about a quarter of infants died before their first birthday. As survival improved, parents invested more time and money in children. Rousseau's Emile (1762) urged mothers to breastfeed their own babies and to let children learn through experience. Historians debate how much feeling parents had for children earlier; most now think parents always loved their children but that ideas about childhood changed.

Poor families faced hard choices. Many babies were sent to wet nurses, women paid to breastfeed other people's children, and abandonment rose. Cities opened foundling hospitals, like London's in 1739, but many abandoned infants died there.

Growing cities

Cities grew mostly through migration from the countryside. The Agricultural Revolution produced more food with fewer workers, so many rural people left to look for work in towns. London reached about a million people by 1800, and Paris had more than half a million. Cities offered work but also crowding, disease and poverty.

Crime and disorder became visible public concerns. In London's Gin Craze (about 1720–1751), cheap gin fed widespread drunkenness until Parliament passed laws in 1751 to limit it; William Hogarth's print Gin Lane showed the damage. City governments struggled to provide clean water, safety and order, and the close community controls of village life weakened. Crowded poverty made crime, begging and prostitution more visible, so authorities policed the poor and other marginal groups more closely. Governments and charities built workhouses and poor relief systems and tried to separate the deserving poor from those they saw as idle.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    A causation chain

    Short-answer practice: Explain one cause of European population growth in the 18th century.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Name a specific cause.
    2. Step 2: Explain how it lowered death rates or raised birth rates.
    3. Step 3: Add a specific detail.

    Answer: Model answer: The spread of the potato, a crop from the Americas that produces many calories per acre and grows in poor soil, gave poor families a reliable food source. With fewer deaths from famine and malnutrition, populations in places like Ireland and the German states grew rapidly during the 1700s.

Common mistakes

  • Crediting modern medicine for 18th-century population growth. Food supply and the end of plague mattered more; medicine was still limited.
  • Saying people married young before industrialization. In northwestern Europe they married late.
  • Assuming urban growth came from city births. Cities grew mainly through migration because their death rates were high.

On the exam

  • Population questions often come with a chart. Read the time period and region carefully, then connect the trend to food, disease or migration.
  • Link this topic forward to industrialization; a growing population supplied workers and consumers (see 6.1).

Connected topics

Videos

  • SOCIETY & Demographics in 18th Century Europe [AP Euro Review—Unit 4 Topic 4]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • AP Euro 4.4: 18th-Century Society and Demographics

    Emily NeinastWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • What Was the Agricultural Revolution? AP Euro Bit by Bit #23

    AP Euro Bit by Bit with Paul SargentWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • How we conquered the deadly smallpox virus - Simona Zompi

    TED-EdWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Mary Wortley Montagu and Smallpox Inoculation in Early Modern England

    newberrylibraryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

5 questions on 4.4 18th-Century Society and Demographics. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Question 1 of 5

Which of the following best explains Europe's rapid population growth in the 1700s?

Year | Population of England (millions) | Population of London (thousands)

About 1700 | 5.1 | 575

About 1750 | 5.8 | 675

1801 | 8.7 | 960

Source: Estimates, rounded, based on E. A. Wrigley and R. S. Schofield's reconstruction of England's population and E. A. Wrigley's estimates for London; London in 1801 from the census of that year.

Question 2 of 5

Which of the following is best supported by the data?

Question 3 of 5

According to the table, London grew from about 575,000 to 960,000 people over the century, even though for most of the 1700s more people died in the city each year than were born there. London's growth therefore depended mainly on

Assuming then my postulata as granted, I say, that the power of population is indefinitely greater than the power in the earth to produce subsistence for man.

Population, when unchecked, increases in a geometrical ratio. Subsistence increases only in an arithmetical ratio. A slight acquaintance with numbers will shew the immensity of the first power in comparison of the second. . . . This implies a strong and constantly operating check on population from the difficulty of subsistence. This difficulty must fall somewhere and must necessarily be severely felt by a large portion of mankind.

Source: Thomas Robert Malthus, English clergyman and economist, An Essay on the Principle of Population, 1798.

Question 4 of 5

Malthus's argument in the passage leads most directly to the conclusion that

Question 5 of 5

Malthus wrote partly to answer Enlightenment writers such as Condorcet. His view differed from theirs mainly in rejecting

0 of 5 answered