Skip to main content

Unit 3 · Topic 3.7

3.7 Absolutist Approaches to Power

Absolute monarchs claimed full power without sharing it with a representative body, though they still needed the nobility's cooperation. Louis XIV of France and Peter the Great of Russia are the classic examples, using palaces, officials, armies and control of religion to strengthen royal rule.

Key terms

  • absolutism
  • Versailles
  • intendants
  • revocation of the Edict of Nantes (1685)
  • Peter the Great
  • westernization

See it on a map: 1715: After the War of the Spanish Succession

What absolutism meant

Absolutism is a system where the monarch holds supreme power, makes laws and taxes without a parliament's consent and controls the army, bureaucracy and church. In practice, no king could rule alone. Monarchs made deals with nobles: nobles lost real political power but kept their titles, land, tax exemptions and social rank. Many historians stress that absolutism worked through cooperation with elites, not just force.

Louis XIV of France (reigned 1643–1715)

Louis took personal control in 1661, after Cardinal Mazarin died, and never appointed another chief minister. He is often quoted as saying I am the state, though he probably never said it; it does capture his style.

  • Versailles: he turned a hunting lodge outside Paris into a huge palace and moved the court there in 1682. Great nobles were expected to live at court, where they competed for royal favor through elaborate rituals, far from their power bases in the provinces.
  • Intendants: royal officials, often from non-noble backgrounds, who ran the provinces, collected taxes and reported directly to the king.
  • No Estates-General: France's national assembly never met during his reign (it met in 1614 and not again until 1789), and he restricted the right of the Paris parlement, a high law court, to object to his laws.
  • Army and economy: he built one of Europe's largest armies, and Colbert's mercantilist policies (see 3.4) funded it.
  • Religion: one king, one law, one faith. In 1685 the Edict of Fontainebleau revoked the Edict of Nantes, banning Protestant worship. Perhaps 150,000 to 200,000 Huguenots fled to the Dutch Republic, England, Prussia and elsewhere, taking valuable skills with them.
AchievementCost or limit
Tamed the great noblesNobles kept tax exemptions, so peasants bore the tax burden
Expanded France's bordersConstant wars left massive debt at his death in 1715
Religious unityLost skilled Huguenot workers and angered Protestant Europe

Peter the Great of Russia (reigned 1682–1725)

Peter wanted to make Russia a modern European power. On his Grand Embassy (1697–1698) he traveled through western Europe, even working in Dutch shipyards. Westernization meant adopting western European technology, institutions and customs.

He built a modern army and Russia's first navy, beat Sweden in the Great Northern War and founded a new capital, St. Petersburg (1703), on the Baltic as his window to the West. He crushed a revolt by the streltsy, Moscow's palace guards, ordered nobles to shave their beards and wear Western clothes, and created the Table of Ranks (1722), which tied noble status to state service in the army or bureaucracy. He opened schools of mathematics and navigation and planned the Academy of Sciences, which opened in St. Petersburg in 1725. He replaced the head of the Russian Orthodox Church, the patriarch, with a council called the Holy Synod under state control.

Peter's reforms rested on the peasants. He raised taxes, introduced a head tax on every male peasant, and serfdom grew harsher. Catherine the Great (reigned 1762–1796) later continued westernization and expanded Russia, while giving nobles more privileges in her Charter of the Nobility (1785).

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Comparing two absolutists

    Short-answer practice: Explain one similarity between how Louis XIV and Peter the Great controlled their nobles.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: State the similarity.
    2. Step 2: Give specific evidence from each ruler.
    3. Step 3: Explain why each did it.

    Answer: Model answer: Both rulers tied nobles' status to the crown. Louis XIV drew great nobles to Versailles, where their prestige depended on royal favor, while Peter the Great's Table of Ranks (1722) made noble rank depend on service to the state. In both cases, rulers kept nobles' privileges but took away their independent political power.

Common mistakes

  • Saying absolute monarchs destroyed the nobility. They tamed nobles politically but protected their social privileges.
  • Treating I am the state as a proven quotation. Use it only as a famous saying that sums up his style.
  • Calling Peter's reforms popular. Many Russians, including the clergy and peasants, resented them, and serfs paid the price.

On the exam

  • Have three specific methods per ruler ready; long essays on state building reward that depth.
  • Absolutism is often paired with constitutionalism for comparison; see 3.8.

Connected topics

Videos

  • The Rise of ABSOLUTISM, Explained [AP Euro Review—Unit 3 Topic 7]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • AP Euro 3.7: Absolutist Approaches to Power

    Emily NeinastWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Absolute Monarchy: Crash Course European History #13

    CrashCourseWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • What Was Absolutism?: AP Euro Bit by Bit #20

    AP Euro Bit by Bit with Paul SargentWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The Rise of Russia and Prussia: Crash Course European History #17

    CrashCourseWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Ten Minute History - Peter the Great and the Russian Empire (Short Documentary)

    History MattersWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 3.7 Absolutist Approaches to Power. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Rulers then act as the ministers of God and as his lieutenants on earth. It is through them that God exercises his empire. . . . Consequently, as we have seen, the royal throne is not the throne of a man, but the throne of God himself. . . . It appears from all this that the person of the king is sacred, and that to attack him in any way is sacrilege. . . .

But kings, although their power comes from on high, as has been said, should not regard themselves as masters of that power to use it at their pleasure; . . . they must employ it with fear and self-restraint, as a thing coming from God and of which God will demand an account.

Source: Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet, French bishop and tutor to Louis XIV's son and heir, Politics Drawn from the Very Words of Holy Scripture, written in the 1670s and published in 1709. Translated in James Harvey Robinson, ed., Readings in European History, 1906.

Question 1 of 4

Which of the following best summarizes Bossuet's argument?

Question 2 of 4

Bossuet's role as tutor to the heir to the French throne suggests that the work was intended mainly to

The tsar labored at the reform of fashions, or, more properly speaking, of dress. Until that time the Russians had always worn long beards, which they cherished and preserved with much care . . . . The tsar, in order to reform that custom, ordered that gentlemen, merchants, and other subjects, except priests and peasants, should each pay a tax . . . if they wished to keep their beards . . . . Officials were stationed at the gates of the towns to collect that tax, which the Russians regarded as an enormous sin on the part of the tsar and as a thing which tended to the abolition of their religion. . . .

The tsar issued an ordinance abolishing that costume, commanding all the boyars (nobles) and all those who had positions at the court to dress after the French fashion . . . .

Source: Jean Rousset de Missy, French writer, Memoirs of the Reign of Peter the Great, 1725–1726. Rousset never visited Russia. Translated in James Harvey Robinson, ed., Readings in European History, 1906.

Question 3 of 4

The reforms described were part of Peter the Great's broader effort to

Question 4 of 4

Which of the following most limits the usefulness of this passage as evidence of Russian reactions to the reforms?

0 of 4 answered