Skip to main content

Unit 1 · Topic 1.9

1.9 The Slave Trade

Europeans built an Atlantic slave trade that forced millions of Africans to the Americas to work on plantations, especially sugar plantations in Brazil and the Caribbean. The trade linked Europe, Africa and the Americas in a profitable and deadly system that grew larger in the 1700s.

Key terms

  • Middle Passage
  • plantation economy
  • sugar
  • triangular trade
  • chattel slavery

Why the trade began

Portuguese ships began taking enslaved Africans from the West African coast in the 1440s. The Portuguese then set up sugar plantations, large farms growing one cash crop with forced labor, on Atlantic islands like Madeira and São Tomé. This plantation model moved to Brazil in the 1500s and then to the Caribbean.

Sugar was extremely profitable in Europe and extremely labor-intensive to grow and process. As disease and forced labor destroyed Indigenous populations (see 1.8), and European indentured workers proved too few, planters turned to enslaved Africans.

How the trade worked

Historians often describe a triangular trade: ships carried European manufactured goods like cloth, metal goods and guns to West Africa; exchanged them for enslaved people; carried those captives across the Atlantic; and brought sugar, tobacco and other plantation products back to Europe. Real routes were often messier, but the triangle captures the three-continent link.

Europeans mostly stayed in forts on the coast, where disease and African military power kept them out of the interior. African rulers and merchants sold people captured in wars or raids in exchange for European goods. The Spanish crown sold an asiento, a license to supply enslaved Africans to its colonies, to foreign merchants.

The Middle Passage and chattel slavery

The Middle Passage was the voyage across the Atlantic, the middle leg of the triangle. Captives were chained below deck in crowded, filthy conditions for weeks. On average more than one in ten died during the crossing, and death rates were higher on many voyages.

Chattel slavery meant enslaved people were treated as property that could be bought and sold, and the status passed from mother to child. Over time, Europeans increasingly justified it with ideas of racial difference.

Scholars estimate that about 12.5 million Africans were forced onto ships from 1501 to 1866, and about 10.7 million survived the voyage. Brazil received the largest share, and most of the trade took place after 1650, with the 1700s as its peak.

Effects

  • Americas: plantation economies built on enslaved labor, planter societies in which a small group of wealthy white landowners ruled an enslaved majority, and large African-descended populations with their own cultures and resistance, including revolts and runaway communities.
  • Africa: the loss of millions of mostly young people, more warfare and raiding, and some coastal states growing powerful from the trade.
  • Europe: profits for merchants, planters and ports; cheap sugar and tobacco that helped create a consumer culture (see 3.4).

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    A causation chain

    Short-answer practice: Explain one cause of the growth of the Atlantic slave trade between 1500 and 1650.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Name the cause precisely.
    2. Step 2: Connect it to the demand for enslaved labor.
    3. Step 3: Include a place or crop.

    Answer: Model answer: The spread of sugar plantations from Atlantic islands to Brazil and the Caribbean created huge demand for labor, because growing and processing sugarcane required many workers. Since disease and forced labor had drastically reduced Indigenous populations, Portuguese and other planters turned to enslaved Africans to meet that demand.

Common mistakes

  • Saying most enslaved Africans went to North America. Brazil and the Caribbean received the great majority; British North America took a small share.
  • Leaving out African involvement or, on the other hand, using it to minimize European responsibility. Show that European demand and money drove the system, and African elites took part as sellers.
  • Placing the trade's peak in the 1500s. It existed then, but it was far larger in the 1700s.

On the exam

  • Link the slave trade to the Columbian Exchange, mercantilism and the consumer revolution. Those connections earn complexity points.
  • Chart-based questions may show numbers of enslaved people by region or century. Check which region and which period each bar represents.

Connected topics

Videos

  • The African Slave Trade, Explained [AP Euro Review: Unit 1 Topic 9 (1.9)]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The Atlantic slave trade

    Khan AcademyWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The Atlantic Slave Trade: Crash Course World History #24

    CrashCourseWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The Atlantic slave trade: What too few textbooks told you - Anthony Hazard

    TED-EdWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • AP Euro 1.8 & 1.9: Colonial Expansion and Columbian Exchange; The Slave Trade

    Emily NeinastWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 1.9 The Slave Trade. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Flag of the shipsEnslaved Africans embarked, 1501–1866 (millions, rounded)
Portugal and Brazil5.85
Great Britain3.26
France1.38
Spain and Uruguay1.06
Netherlands0.55
United States0.31
Denmark and the Baltic0.11
Total12.52

Source: Estimates from the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database (slavevoyages.org).

Question 1 of 4

Which of the following claims is best supported by the data in the table?

Question 2 of 4

Which of the following best explains why Portuguese and Brazilian ships carried the largest number of enslaved Africans?

Question 3 of 4

Which of the following best explains why the Spanish crown sold asientos, contracts that let foreign merchants supply enslaved Africans to Spain's American colonies?

The Spaniards first assaulted the innocent Sheep . . . like most cruel Tygers, Wolves and Lions hunger-starv'd, studying nothing, for the space of Forty Years, after their first landing, but the Massacre of these Wretches . . . that of Three Millions of Persons, which lived in Hispaniola itself, there is at present but the inconsiderable remnant of scarce Three Hundred. . . .

Now the ultimate end and scope that incited the Spaniards to endeavor the Extirpation and Desolation of this People, was Gold only; that thereby growing opulent in a short time, they might arrive at once at such Degrees and Dignities, as were no wayes consistent with their Persons.

Source: Bartolomé de las Casas, Spanish Dominican friar and bishop, A Brief Account of the Destruction of the Indies, 1552, addressed to the Spanish crown. From an English translation printed in London in 1689 under the title Popery Truly Display'd in its Bloody Colours.

Question 4 of 4

Arguments such as Las Casas's most directly contributed to which of the following developments in the 1500s?

0 of 4 answered