Skip to main content

Unit 1 · Topic 1.5

1.5 New Monarchies

Between about 1450 and 1600, rulers in England, France and Spain built stronger, more centralized states. These new monarchs taxed more directly, controlled armies and courts, relied on middle-class officials, and took more control over the Church in their lands.

Key terms

  • new monarchs
  • centralization
  • Star Chamber
  • Spanish Inquisition
  • Concordat of Bologna (1516)
  • sovereignty

What made a monarchy new

Medieval kings shared power with nobles, the Church and towns. Centralization means pulling that power into the hands of the central government. New monarchs did this in a few main ways:

  • Taxes: collecting regular taxes directly, so they did not depend on nobles' goodwill.
  • Armies: building royal armies with gunpowder weapons. Cannons could knock down castle walls, so rebellious nobles were easier to crush.
  • Courts and law: using royal courts to enforce the king's law across the kingdom.
  • Officials: hiring educated men from the middle class, often lawyers, who owed their jobs to the king rather than to family power.
  • Religion: gaining control over Church appointments and Church wealth.

England, France and Spain

England: Henry VII won the Battle of Bosworth in 1485, ending the Wars of the Roses and starting the Tudor dynasty. He restricted nobles' private armies and used the Court of Star Chamber, a royal court that met without juries, to try powerful nobles whom local juries feared to convict. He filled his treasury and leaned on local gentry who served as justices of the peace. His son Henry VIII broke with Rome and made himself head of the English Church with the Act of Supremacy (1534), and Elizabeth I's religious settlement of 1559 set up a Protestant Church of England under the crown.

France: Louis XI (reigned 1461–1483) expanded royal lands, including much of Burgundy after 1477, and raised the taille, a direct tax that fell on peasants and other commoners because nobles and clergy were exempt. Francis I signed the Concordat of Bologna (1516) with Pope Leo X. It let the French king nominate bishops and abbots, giving him control of Church jobs and wealth in France, which is one reason French kings had little reason to turn Protestant.

Spain: Ferdinand of Aragon and Isabella of Castile married in 1469 and joined their kingdoms in a personal union. They tamed nobles, used local militias called the Hermandad to keep order and, in 1478, set up the Spanish Inquisition, a royal church court that hunted heresy, especially among Jewish and Muslim converts. They conquered Granada in 1492, expelled Jews who would not convert that same year, and later forced Muslims in Castile to convert or leave.

Sovereignty and its limits

Sovereignty means supreme authority over a territory, with no higher power inside it. In 1576 the French thinker Jean Bodin argued that every state needs one sovereign power to keep order. New monarchs were moving toward that idea.

But centralization had limits. Nobles still held land and local power, parliaments and estates still had to approve some taxes, and the Holy Roman Empire stayed a loose collection of hundreds of states. Absolutism, the fuller version of royal control, comes later in Unit 3.

Italy shows the other side. Its city-states stayed divided, and after 1494 French and Spanish armies fought over them. Watching this, Machiavelli (see 1.2) described the state in purely practical, secular terms, as power a ruler must keep by whatever means work. Meanwhile, across Europe, merchants, bankers and lawyers gained a bigger political voice as royal officials, lenders to kings and members of town councils and parliaments.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Using specific evidence

    Short-answer practice: Give one piece of evidence that European monarchs increased their control over religion between 1450 and 1550, and explain it.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Pick a named agreement, law or institution, with a date.
    2. Step 2: Say what power it gave the ruler.
    3. Step 3: Connect it to centralization.

    Answer: Model answer: The Concordat of Bologna (1516) gave the French king the right to nominate bishops and abbots. This let Francis I reward loyal supporters with Church offices and income, tying the French Church to the crown and strengthening central royal power.

Common mistakes

  • Thinking new monarchs were already absolute. They were stronger than medieval kings but still bargained with nobles, parliaments and towns.
  • Mixing up the Spanish Inquisition (a royal court under Ferdinand and Isabella, 1478) with the Roman Inquisition (a papal court set up in 1542).
  • Leaving out the Holy Roman Empire's weakness. It's the main counterexample to centralization in this period.

On the exam

  • Long-essay prompts on state building from 1450 to 1648 reward specific tools: Star Chamber, the Concordat of Bologna, the Spanish Inquisition, the Act of Supremacy.
  • Be ready to explain how religious change and royal power were linked.

Connected topics

Videos

  • The Rise of NEW MONARCHS [AP Euro—Unit 1 Topic 5 (1.5)]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • AP Euro 1.5: New Monarchies

    Emily NeinastWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • New Monarchies: AP Euro Bit by Bit #9

    AP Euro Bit by Bit with Paul SargentWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • King Henry VII (1485 - 1509) - 10 Minute History

    History With HilbertWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain: AP Euro Bit by Bit #10

    AP Euro Bit by Bit with Paul SargentWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 1.5 New Monarchies. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Question 1 of 4

The Concordat of Bologna (1516) strengthened the French monarchy by

Question 2 of 4

Henry VII of England used the royal Court of Star Chamber mainly to

Question 3 of 4

The Spanish Inquisition, founded in 1478, differed from earlier medieval inquisitions mainly in that it

Upon this a question arises: whether it be better to be loved than feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, it is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with. Because this is to be asserted in general of men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, covetous, and as long as you succeed they are yours entirely . . . but when [the need] approaches they turn against you.

Nevertheless a prince ought to inspire fear in such a way that, if he does not win love, he avoids hatred . . . which will always be as long as he abstains from the property of his citizens and subjects and from their women. . . . [A]bove all things he must keep his hands off the property of others, because men more quickly forget the death of their father than the loss of their patrimony.

Source: Niccolò Machiavelli, Florentine diplomat and official, The Prince, written in 1513. Translated by W. K. Marriott, 1908.

Question 4 of 4

Machiavelli wrote The Prince in a context in which

0 of 4 answered