Skip to main content

Unit 1 · Topic 1.2

1.2 Italian Renaissance

The Italian Renaissance was a revival of ancient Greek and Roman learning and style that flourished in Italian city-states from about 1350 to 1550. Humanist scholars, rich patrons and brilliant artists changed how Europeans thought about people, politics and art.

Key terms

  • humanism
  • secularism
  • individualism
  • patronage
  • linear perspective
  • Machiavelli's The Prince

Humanism: going back to the sources

Humanism was an intellectual movement that studied ancient Greek and Roman texts in grammar, rhetoric, history, poetry and moral philosophy. Humanists believed these subjects, called the studia humanitatis, trained people to live well and serve their communities.

Petrarch (1304–1374) is often called the father of humanism. He hunted for lost Latin manuscripts and wrote letters to long-dead Roman authors like Cicero as if they were friends. Leonardo Bruni, a chancellor of Florence, practiced civic humanism: the idea that educated citizens should take an active part in public life, as Roman republicans had.

Lorenzo Valla showed what close reading could do. In 1440 he studied the language of the Donation of Constantine, a document the papacy used to claim power in the West, and proved it was a forgery written centuries after Constantine. This kind of textual criticism later helped reformers question Church authority. Pico della Mirandola's Oration on the Dignity of Man (1486) argued that humans have the freedom to shape what they become.

Humanism also changed schooling. Teachers such as Vittorino da Feltre in Mantua built lessons around Latin and Greek authors, history and physical training instead of the theology and logic that dominated medieval universities. Because humanists judged a text by evidence, not by who stood behind it, their methods could undercut the authority of universities and the Church.

Three key ideas

  • Individualism: celebrating personal talent and achievement. Artists began signing works and writing about their own lives.
  • Secularism: more attention to life in this world, such as politics, wealth and fame. Renaissance people were still Christians; secular here means a shift of focus, not a loss of faith.
  • Classicism: copying Greek and Roman models in writing, architecture and art.

Machiavelli and Castiglione

Niccolò Machiavelli wrote The Prince in 1513, after he lost his job in the Florentine government. He described how rulers actually gain and keep power rather than how they ought to behave. He argued that a prince may need to be harsh or deceptive to keep the state safe and that it is safer to be feared than loved if you can't be both. That practical, secular view of politics shocked many readers.

Baldassare Castiglione's The Book of the Courtier (1528) described the ideal courtier: educated in the classics, skilled in arms, graceful and able to make it all look effortless. It shows how humanist education became a mark of the elite.

Art and patronage

Patronage means paying artists and scholars, usually to gain prestige. The Medici banking family ran Florence in practice from 1434 and funded artists and the scholar Marsilio Ficino, who translated Plato. Popes such as Julius II paid for Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel ceiling (1508–1512) and Raphael's School of Athens (1509–1511) to show the power of Rome.

Renaissance art used linear perspective, a mathematical method of making a flat surface look three-dimensional, worked out by the architect Brunelleschi in the early 1400s. Artists studied anatomy, used light and shadow for depth, and painted classical as well as religious subjects. Key works include Masaccio's Holy Trinity, Leonardo's Last Supper, Michelangelo's marble David (1501–1504) and Botticelli's Birth of Venus.

Who was left out

The Renaissance mostly touched a small urban elite. A few women, such as Isabella d'Este, a major patron, gained fame, but most women's lives changed little. Historian Joan Kelly asked whether women had a Renaissance at all and argued that elite women actually lost some freedom. Other historians point to educated women as evidence of new chances. Either way, use specific examples.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Explaining a source's point of view

    Short-answer practice: A passage from Machiavelli's The Prince advises rulers to break promises when keeping them would harm the state. Explain one way Machiavelli's historical situation shaped this advice.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Identify the situation: when and where was he writing, and what had just happened to him or his city?
    2. Step 2: Link that situation to the content of the advice.
    3. Step 3: Use a specific detail, like a date, war or person.

    Answer: Model answer: Machiavelli wrote in 1513, when Italian city-states were being invaded by France and Spain during the Italian Wars and Florence's government had just collapsed, costing him his post. Having watched weak, divided states fall to stronger ones, he argued that rulers must put the survival of the state ahead of traditional moral rules.

Common mistakes

  • Saying Renaissance humanists rejected Christianity. Most were devout; they added classical learning to their faith rather than replacing it.
  • Defining secularism as atheism. On the exam it means more focus on worldly matters like politics, wealth and civic life.
  • Describing art without its purpose. Say who paid for it and why, such as the Medici or the papacy displaying power.

On the exam

  • Expect image-based multiple-choice questions. Look for linear perspective, classical columns or nudity, and realistic anatomy as signs of Renaissance style.
  • When a question asks how humanism challenged authority, Valla's exposure of the Donation of Constantine is a strong specific example.

Connected topics

Videos

  • The ITALIAN Renaissance, EXPLAINED [AP Euro, Unit 1 Topic 2 (1.2)]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • AP Euro 1.2: The Italian Renaissance

    Emily NeinastWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • What Was Humanism? AP Euro Bit by Bit #2

    AP Euro Bit by Bit with Paul SargentWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Florence and the Renaissance: Crash Course European History #2

    CrashCourseWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The Italian Renaissance (AP Euro Review)

    Tom RicheyWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • What “Machiavellian” really means - Pazit Cahlon and Alex Gendler

    TED-EdWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 1.2 Italian Renaissance. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

At that time the Magnificent Lorenzo de' Medici kept the sculptor Bertoldo in his garden on the Piazza di S. Marco, not so much as custodian or guardian of the many beautiful antiques that he had collected and gathered together at great expense in that place, as because, desiring very earnestly to create a school of excellent painters and sculptors, he wished that these should have as their chief and guide the above-named Bertoldo . . . .

Moreover, having made a resolve to assist and favour Michelagnolo, he sent for his father Lodovico and asked for the boy from him, saying that he wished to maintain him as one of his own children . . . . Thereupon the Magnificent Lorenzo granted him a chamber in his own house . . . . During that time, then, Michelagnolo had five ducats a month from that lord as an allowance and also to help his father; and for his particular gratification Lorenzo gave him a violet cloak, and to his father an office in the Customs.

Source: Giorgio Vasari, Italian painter and architect who served the Medici dukes of Florence, Lives of the Most Eminent Painters, Sculptors and Architects, second edition, 1568, describing events of about 1490. Translated by Gaston du C. de Vere, 1912–1915.

Question 1 of 4

Lorenzo de' Medici's actions described in the passage most directly illustrate which of the following?

Question 2 of 4

Vasari's position as an artist who worked for the later Medici dukes most likely affected his account in which of the following ways?

Upon this a question arises: whether it be better to be loved than feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, it is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with. Because this is to be asserted in general of men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, covetous, and as long as you succeed they are yours entirely . . . but when [the need] approaches they turn against you.

Nevertheless a prince ought to inspire fear in such a way that, if he does not win love, he avoids hatred . . . which will always be as long as he abstains from the property of his citizens and subjects and from their women. . . . [A]bove all things he must keep his hands off the property of others, because men more quickly forget the death of their father than the loss of their patrimony.

Source: Niccolò Machiavelli, Florentine diplomat and official, The Prince, written in 1513. Translated by W. K. Marriott, 1908.

Question 3 of 4

Machiavelli's argument in the passage best reflects which of the following Renaissance developments?

Question 4 of 4

Machiavelli wrote The Prince in a context in which

0 of 4 answered