AP® African American Studies review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/african-american-studies/units/2/2-7)
Unit 2 · Topic 2.7
2.7 Slavery and American Law: Slave Codes and Landmark Cases
Colonial and US law built slavery into a race-based, inherited, lifelong condition. Slave codes, the Constitution's hidden references to slavery, Northern restrictions on free Black people and the Dred Scott decision all limited Black freedom and citizenship, often in direct response to Black resistance.
Key terms
- slave codes
- chattel slavery
- Code Noir
- South Carolina Slave Code of 1740
- Dred Scott v. Sandford
- fugitive slave clause
Slave codes
Slave codes were laws that defined chattel slavery, in which a person is owned as property for life and their children inherit that status. The codes made slavery race-based and restricted enslaved people's movement, gatherings, access to weapons and even what fabrics they could wear. Every enslaving society in the Americas had them, including the French Code Noir and the Spanish Código Negro.
Louisiana's Code Noir (1724) had rules much like South Carolina's, with more emphasis on Catholic instruction. It recognized marriages between enslaved people but banned relationships across racial lines.
By reserving freedom and opportunity for white people and denying them to Black people, these laws hardened the color line, the boundary that separated people by race.
South Carolina's 1740 code: a response to resistance
After the Stono Rebellion of 1739 (2.11), South Carolina rewrote its slave code. The 1740 code presumed all Black people, and Native people who had not submitted to the colony, to be enslaved and treated them as nonsubjects with no protections. It barred enslaved people from meeting in groups, drumming, rebelling, running away and leaving the colony, and it fined anyone who taught an enslaved person to write. (A later South Carolina law, in 1834, banned teaching reading too.) An enslaved person who struck back at a white attacker, even in self-defense, could be put to death.
The lesson: slave codes grew stricter as enslaved people resisted.
The Constitution and Northern laws
The Constitution (1787) protected slavery without using the word. Article I, Section 2 counted 'three fifths of all other Persons' for representation, which gave slaveholding states extra seats in Congress. Article IV, Section 2, the fugitive slave clause, required that a person 'held to Service or Labour' who escaped to another state be returned. The delegates chose to avoid the words 'slave' and 'slavery'. 'Slavery' first appears in the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished it.
Free states also limited Black freedom. Some barred free Black people from moving in. Ohio barred Black testimony against white people in court, and New York put a property requirement on Black voters only. Most Northern states kept Black men from voting. By 1860, Black men could vote on the same terms as white men only in five New England states. After the Civil War, Wisconsin, Iowa and Minnesota opened voting to Black men, and Congress required it in the former Confederate states in 1867, but many Northern states held out until the Fifteenth Amendment (1870) barred racial voting bans everywhere.
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Dred Scott, an enslaved man, sued for his freedom because his enslaver had taken him to live in a free state and a free territory. In 1857 the Supreme Court ruled against him. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney wrote that Black people, enslaved or free, were not and could never be US citizens, and that they had been regarded as 'so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect'. The ruling also said Congress couldn't ban slavery in the territories.
The decision showed how laws and court cases worked together to deny Black people citizenship. The Reconstruction Amendments later overturned it (3.1).
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
Linking resistance and law
Explain how South Carolina's 1740 slave code developed in response to African American resistance.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: Name the resistance: the Stono Rebellion of 1739.
- Step 2: Name specific restrictions in the 1740 code.
- Step 3: Connect them: each rule targeted a tool the rebels had used, like gathering, drumming or escape.
Answer: Model answer: After the Stono Rebellion of 1739, when enslaved people organized, gathered and marched toward freedom in Spanish Florida, South Carolina passed the 1740 slave code. It banned enslaved people from gathering, drumming and running away, and it punished anyone who taught them to write, all ways they could plan and spread resistance. The law shows that slave codes tightened in direct response to Black resistance.
Common mistakes
- Saying the original Constitution used the word 'slave'. It used phrases like 'other Persons' and 'held to Service or Labour'.
- Assuming free states treated free Black people equally. Many limited voting, testimony and even entry.
- Forgetting that Dred Scott denied citizenship to free Black people too, not only enslaved people.
On the exam
- Legal texts are required sources here. Practice explaining what a law restricted and why lawmakers wanted it.
- Show cause and effect: resistance, then a harsher law.
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself
5 questions on 2.7 Slavery and American Law: Slave Codes and Landmark Cases. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
"No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due."
United States Constitution, Article IV, Section 2, 1787
The clause shows that the framers of the Constitution
Congress later passed laws to enforce this clause, most notably in
"The question is simply this: Can a negro, whose ancestors were imported into this country, and sold as slaves, become a member of the political community formed and brought into existence by the Constitution of the United States, and as such become entitled to all the rights, and privileges, and immunities, guarantied by that instrument to the citizen?"
"We think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word 'citizens' in the Constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the United States."
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, opinion of the Court, Dred Scott v. Sandford, 1857
Taney's opinion held that
The ruling contributed most directly to which response among some Black abolitionists?
Which later change most directly overturned the citizenship part of this ruling?
0 of 5 answered