Skip to main content

Unit 9 · Topic 9.6

9.6 Challenges of the 21st Century

The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks led the U.S. into a war on terrorism, including long and controversial wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Americans debated whether new security measures, such as the USA PATRIOT Act and the detention of suspects at Guantánamo Bay, went too far, and argued over oil dependence and climate change, while the U.S. remained the world's leading superpower.

Key terms

  • September 11 attacks
  • war on terrorism
  • USA PATRIOT Act
  • Iraq War
  • civil liberties
  • climate change

September 11 and the war in Afghanistan

On September 11, 2001, 19 hijackers from the Islamist terrorist group al-Qaeda, led by Osama bin Laden, seized four airliners. They flew two into the World Trade Center towers in New York and one into the Pentagon near Washington, D.C. Passengers fought back on the fourth plane, which crashed in a Pennsylvania field. Nearly 3,000 people were killed, the deadliest foreign attack on U.S. soil.

President George W. Bush declared a war on terrorism. In October 2001 the U.S. and its allies invaded Afghanistan, whose Taliban government had sheltered al-Qaeda, and quickly drove the Taliban from power. But the fighting dragged on for two decades as the Taliban regrouped. U.S. forces killed bin Laden in Pakistan in 2011, and the last U.S. troops left Afghanistan in 2021, after which the Taliban returned to power.

The Iraq War

Bush argued that the U.S. should strike threats before they could attack, a policy of preemption often called the Bush Doctrine. His administration claimed that Iraq's dictator, Saddam Hussein, had weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and links to terrorists. In March 2003 a U.S.-led force invaded Iraq without the approval of the UN Security Council and toppled Saddam within weeks. No stockpiles of WMD were found, and no operational partnership between Saddam and al-Qaeda was shown.

An insurgency and violence between Sunni and Shia Muslims followed. A 'surge' of additional U.S. troops in 2007 helped reduce violence, and U.S. combat forces left in 2011. Nearly 4,500 U.S. troops died, and estimates of Iraqi deaths run from more than 100,000 to several hundred thousand. Supporters said removing a brutal dictator made the region safer; critics said the war was based on faulty intelligence and drained resources from Afghanistan. The wars also cost trillions of dollars.

Security versus civil liberties

  • USA PATRIOT Act (October 2001): passed with only one vote against in the Senate, it expanded the government's power to conduct surveillance, track phone and internet records, and share intelligence. Supporters said it closed gaps that had let the hijackers go undetected; critics, including the ACLU, said it threatened privacy and freedom of speech.
  • New agencies: the Transportation Security Administration (2001) took over airport screening, and Congress created the Department of Homeland Security (2002).
  • Secret surveillance: the National Security Agency's programs, revealed in 2005 and more fully by Edward Snowden in 2013, collected phone records of millions of Americans. Congress limited bulk collection in 2015.
  • Detention and interrogation: suspected enemy fighters were held without trial at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, from 2002. Photos of abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison (2004) and the use of 'enhanced interrogation' methods such as waterboarding, which critics called torture, caused outrage. The Supreme Court ruled in Boumediene v. Bush (2008) that Guantánamo detainees could challenge their detention in federal court.
  • Muslim, Arab and Sikh Americans faced hate crimes and extra scrutiny, raising questions about equal treatment.

Energy, the environment and American power

Conflicts in the oil-rich Middle East renewed arguments over how much the U.S. relied on oil, coal and gas. Scientists warned that burning oil, coal and gas was warming the planet. The U.S. signed the Kyoto Protocol (adopted 1997) on cutting greenhouse gases, but the Senate never ratified it, and U.S. participation in later climate agreements, such as the 2015 Paris Agreement, shifted with changes in administration. Supporters of action stressed the risks of climate change; opponents worried about costs to jobs and the economy. New drilling methods like fracking made the U.S. the world's largest oil and natural gas producer by the 2010s.

Despite costly wars, the 2008 financial crisis and the rise of China as an economic and military rival, the U.S. was still the world's most powerful nation after 2000, with the largest economy and by far the largest military budget.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    A balanced argument paragraph

    Write a paragraph evaluating the extent to which the war on terrorism changed the balance between security and civil liberties in the United States after 2001.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Make a claim that answers 'to what extent.'
    2. Step 2: Support the change side with specific laws and practices.
    3. Step 3: Add a limit or continuity: courts and Congress pushed back, and wartime limits on liberty have happened before.
    4. Step 4: Explain how the evidence supports your judgment.

    Answer: Model paragraph: The war on terrorism shifted the balance significantly toward security, though courts and Congress later restored some limits. The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 expanded federal surveillance powers, the National Security Agency secretly collected the phone records of millions of Americans, and hundreds of suspected enemy fighters were held without trial at Guantánamo Bay. However, the Supreme Court ruled in Boumediene v. Bush (2008) that detainees could challenge their imprisonment, and in 2015 Congress ended the NSA's bulk collection of phone records. Like the Alien and Sedition Acts, the Espionage Act of World War I and the incarceration of Japanese Americans in World War II, the post-9/11 measures show that Americans have often accepted limits on liberty during perceived emergencies and then reconsidered them.

Common mistakes

  • Mixing up the two wars. Afghanistan (2001) targeted al-Qaeda and the Taliban who sheltered it; Iraq (2003) targeted Saddam Hussein, who had no role in 9/11.
  • Presenting the Patriot Act debate one-sidedly. Show both the security argument and the civil liberties argument.
  • Leaving the environment out of this topic. The CED ties Middle East conflicts to debates over fossil fuels and climate change.

On the exam

  • Sources from this topic, such as a presidential speech after 9/11 or a senator's speech against the Patriot Act, are good practice for explaining point of view and purpose.
  • Connect wartime civil liberties debates to earlier periods for continuity: the Alien and Sedition Acts, World War I, Japanese American incarceration and the Red Scare.

Connected topics

Videos

  • CHALLENGES of the 21st Century in America [APUSH Review Unit 9 Topic 6] Period 9: 1980-Present

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • APUSH #104 - 9.6 Challenges of the 21st Century

    APUSH SlidesWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Challenges Facing the U.S. in the 21st Century [APUSH Review]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Terrorism, War, and Bush 43: Crash Course US History #46

    CrashCourseWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Challenges of the 21st Century in Under 3 mins (APUSH Unit 9 Topic 6) 9.6

    Maximum InsightWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 9.6 Challenges of the 21st Century. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

"Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated. . . . We will starve terrorists of funding, turn them one against another, drive them from place to place, until there is no refuge or no rest. And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime."

Source: President George W. Bush, address to a joint session of Congress, September 20, 2001.

Question 1 of 4

The policy Bush announced in the passage led most directly to

Question 2 of 4

At home, the response to the September 11 attacks led to a debate over

Question 3 of 4

Bush's warning that nations which "harbor or support terrorism" would be treated as hostile represented a shift in U.S. foreign policy because it

Question 4 of 4

Debates over climate change policy in the United States since the 1990s have centered mainly on

0 of 4 answered