AP® United States History review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/us-history/units/5/5-3)
Unit 5 · Topic 5.3
5.3 The Mexican–American War
A border dispute after the annexation of Texas led to the Mexican–American War (1846–1848). The United States won and, in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, took about half of Mexico's territory, counting Texas. The question of whether slavery could spread into this land, raised at once by the Wilmot Proviso, became the central issue in American politics.
Key terms
- Mexican–American War
- Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo
- Mexican Cession
- Wilmot Proviso
- Rio Grande
See it on a map: 1845: Texas joins the Union · 1848: The Mexican Cession · 1853: The Gadsden Purchase
Causes of the war
Mexico had never accepted Texas independence, and it disputed the border: Texas claimed the Rio Grande, while Mexico said the border was the Nueces River, farther north. President Polk also wanted to buy California and New Mexico, but Mexico refused to negotiate.
In 1846 Polk sent General Zachary Taylor's army into the disputed land between the two rivers. When Mexican troops attacked an American patrol there in April 1846, Polk told Congress that Mexico had 'shed American blood upon the American soil'. Congress declared war in May 1846.
Opposition to the war
Many Whigs, abolitionists and some New Englanders opposed the war. They saw it as an unjust land grab and suspected a 'Slave Power' plot to add slave territory. Abraham Lincoln, then a young Whig congressman from Illinois, introduced the 'spot resolutions', demanding that Polk identify the exact spot where American blood had been shed and suggesting it was actually Mexican soil. Henry David Thoreau refused to pay a tax in protest (4.9).
Supporters, especially Democrats in the South and West, saw the war as Manifest Destiny in action.
The war and the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo
American forces won nearly every major battle. Taylor won in northern Mexico, other forces took New Mexico and California, and General Winfield Scott landed at Veracruz and captured Mexico City in September 1847. About 13,000 Americans died, most of them from disease.
In the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (February 1848), Mexico accepted the Rio Grande border and gave up the Mexican Cession: California, Nevada and Utah, most of Arizona, and parts of New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming. The United States paid $15 million and took over about $3.25 million in claims American citizens had against Mexico. Counting Texas, Mexico lost about half its territory.
The treaty promised Mexicans who stayed in the ceded lands US citizenship and protection of their property. In practice, many lost their land through legal challenges, fraud and violence, and Mexican Americans faced discrimination.
The Wilmot Proviso and the slavery question
In 1846, just months into the war, Pennsylvania Democrat David Wilmot proposed that slavery be banned in any territory gained from Mexico. The Wilmot Proviso passed the House, where the more populous North had a majority, but failed in the Senate, where the sections were evenly balanced.
The vote split by section rather than by party: Northern Democrats and Whigs voted against Southern Democrats and Whigs. That was a warning that slavery could break the national parties apart.
Several positions emerged:
- Free soil: ban slavery from all the new territories (Wilmot Proviso; the Free-Soil Party, formed in 1848).
- Extend the Missouri Compromise line of 36°30′ to the Pacific.
- Popular sovereignty: let the settlers of each territory decide by vote (Lewis Cass, later Stephen Douglas).
- Slavery everywhere: Congress has no power to ban slavery in any territory, because enslaved people are property protected by the Constitution (John C. Calhoun).
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
Explaining a political effect
Short-answer practice: Briefly explain ONE way the Mexican–American War increased sectional tension in the United States.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: Name the specific development that came from the war.
- Step 2: Show how Northerners and Southerners reacted differently.
- Step 3: Explain why that increased tension.
Answer: Model answer: The war added the vast Mexican Cession and immediately raised the question of whether slavery could spread there. When David Wilmot proposed banning slavery in all land taken from Mexico, the House vote split along sectional rather than party lines, with Northerners supporting the ban and Southerners opposing it. This showed that slavery's expansion could divide the national parties and set up the crisis that led to the Compromise of 1850.
Common mistakes
- Saying the Wilmot Proviso became law. It passed the House but never passed the Senate.
- Confusing the Mexican Cession with the Gadsden Purchase (1853), a smaller strip of land bought later for a southern railroad route.
- Treating the war as universally popular. Whigs, abolitionists and others strongly opposed it.
On the exam
- The Wilmot Proviso is one of the most important causation links in Period 5. Explain how it revealed a sectional split in Congress.
- Questions may ask about different groups' views of the war. Use Lincoln's spot resolutions and Thoreau for opposition.
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself
4 questions on 5.3 The Mexican–American War. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
Many Whigs and abolitionists opposed the Mexican–American War mainly because they
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (1848) promised Mexicans living in the ceded lands citizenship and protection of their property. In the following decades, many of them
"Why, were other reasoning wanting, in favor of now elevating this question of the reception of Texas into the Union, out of the lower region of our past party dissensions, up to its proper level of a high and broad nationality, it surely is to be found, found abundantly, in the manner in which other nations have undertaken to intrude themselves into it, between us and the proper parties to the case, in a spirit of hostile interference against us, for the avowed object of thwarting our policy and hampering our power, limiting our greatness and checking the fulfillment of our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions."
Source: John L. O'Sullivan, editor, "Annexation," United States Magazine and Democratic Review, July–August 1845.
The annexation of Texas that O'Sullivan supported led most directly to
"Provided, That, as an express and fundamental condition to the acquisition of any territory from the Republic of Mexico by the United States, by virtue of any treaty which may be negotiated between them, and to the use by the Executive of the moneys herein appropriated, neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall ever exist in any part of said territory, except for crime, whereof the party shall first be duly convicted."
Source: Amendment proposed by Representative David Wilmot of Pennsylvania to a bill funding negotiations with Mexico, August 1846.
The debate over the proviso was significant mainly because it
0 of 4 answered