AP® Psychology review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/psych/units/4/4-3)
Unit 4 · Topic 4.3
4.3 Psychology of Social Situations
Social psychology shows that the situation you're in can change what you think and do. This topic covers norms, persuasion, conformity, obedience, how groups change individual behavior, culture, conflict between groups, the psychology of work, and why people do or don't help. Nearly every concept here fits a short everyday scenario, so practice spotting each one.
Key terms
- conformity
- obedience
- elaboration likelihood model
- groupthink
- social facilitation
- bystander effect
Norms, social influence and persuasion
Social norms are a group's unwritten expectations about how members should act, such as facing the front in an elevator. Social influence theory says pressure from others comes in two kinds. Normative social influence is going along to be accepted or avoid rejection. Informational social influence is going along because you think others know something you don't, like following the crowd toward an exit in an unfamiliar building.
Persuasion is any attempt to change beliefs or actions. The elaboration likelihood model says there are two routes. The central route works when people are motivated and able to think carefully, so strong arguments and evidence change minds, and the change tends to last. The peripheral route works when people aren't thinking hard, so surface cues like a speaker's looks, fame or catchy music do the work. The halo effect, assuming that a person with one good trait (such as attractiveness) has other good traits, is a peripheral cue.
Two techniques depend on the order of requests. Foot-in-the-door: get agreement to a small request first, and people become more likely to agree to a bigger one. Door-in-the-face: start with a huge request that will be refused, then make the smaller request you actually wanted, which now seems reasonable.
Conformity and obedience
Conformity is changing your behavior or beliefs to match a group. In Solomon Asch's line-judgment studies, participants answered aloud after several confederates (people secretly working with the researcher) gave an obviously wrong answer. Many participants went along at least once. Conformity is stronger when the group is unanimous, when there are at least three others, when the group is attractive or high-status, when you must answer publicly, and when you feel unsure. A single ally who breaks from the group sharply reduces conformity.
Obedience is following the direct orders of an authority figure. In Stanley Milgram's 1960s studies, participants were told to give increasingly strong 'shocks' to a learner (the shocks weren't real). In the best-known version, 65 percent continued to the maximum level. Obedience dropped when the experimenter gave orders by phone instead of in person, when the learner was in the same room, when the setting seemed less legitimate, and when participants saw other 'teachers' refuse. The studies also raised serious ethical concerns about deception and distress.
How groups change individuals
- Social facilitation: the presence of others improves performance on simple or well-practiced tasks but can hurt performance on hard or new ones.
- Social loafing: people put in less effort on group tasks when individual contributions aren't tracked.
- Diffusion of responsibility: in a group, each person feels less personally responsible to act.
- Deindividuation: losing self-awareness and restraint in groups that make people feel anonymous, like a masked crowd.
- Group polarization: discussion among like-minded people pushes the group's average view to a more extreme position.
- Groupthink: a group's desire for harmony overrides realistic thinking, so doubts go unspoken and poor decisions follow.
- False consensus effect: overestimating how many people share your opinions and habits.
Culture, conflict and work
Individualist cultures emphasize personal goals and independence; collectivist cultures emphasize group goals, family and harmony. Multiculturalism means valuing and keeping several cultural identities within a society. Culture shapes how you see yourself, for example as an independent person or as a member of a family.
Superordinate goals are shared goals that require groups to cooperate. In Muzafer Sherif's Robbers Cave study, hostility between two boys' camp groups eased when they had to work together, such as pulling a stuck truck. A social trap is a situation where each person acting in their own short-term interest harms everyone, like overfishing a shared lake.
Industrial-organizational (I/O) psychologists study people at work: hiring, management, teamwork and job satisfaction. One concern is burnout, a state of exhaustion, cynicism and reduced effectiveness from long-term job stress.
Helping and the bystander effect
Altruism is unselfish concern for others' welfare. Some researchers argue that much helping reflects social norms. The reciprocity norm is the expectation that you help people who have helped you. The social responsibility norm is the expectation that you help people who depend on you, like young children.
The bystander effect is that a person is less likely to help in an emergency when other people are present. To help, a bystander must notice the event, interpret it as an emergency and take responsibility, and other people interfere at each step: everyone looks calm, and responsibility is spread across the group.
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
Foot-in-the-door or door-in-the-face?
A student-council member asks you to volunteer every Saturday for a year. You say no. She then asks if you'll volunteer for just one Saturday, and you agree. Which technique did she use, and why did it work?
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: Check the order: the large request came first and was refused, then a smaller request followed.
- Step 2: Large-then-small is door-in-the-face. (Foot-in-the-door is small-then-large.)
- Step 3: Explain why: after the big request, the small one seems modest by comparison, and because she 'backed down,' you may feel you should meet her halfway.
Answer: Door-in-the-face: the refused large request made the smaller one seem reasonable and created pressure to compromise.
- Example 2
Social facilitation or social loafing?
A skilled sprinter runs her fastest time in front of a big crowd. In the same week, she and three teammates pull a rope in a tug-of-war, and a sensor shows each pulled less hard than when alone. Name both effects and explain the difference.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: Sprinting is a well-practiced task done individually and observed by others. Being watched improved performance, which is social facilitation.
- Step 2: In the tug-of-war, effort was pooled and no one's individual pull was visible. Each person exerted less effort, which is social loafing.
- Step 3: The difference: social facilitation happens when your individual performance is visible to others; social loafing happens when your contribution is hidden in the group's total.
Answer: The sprint shows social facilitation (an audience improves a well-learned individual task). The tug-of-war shows social loafing (less effort when contributions aren't individually measured).
- Example 3
The trap: conformity versus obedience
At a new job, Sam notices that everyone stays 15 minutes past closing, though no one has asked him to. He starts staying late too. A classmate calls this obedience. Explain why that's wrong.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: Obedience requires a direct order from an authority figure. No one told Sam to stay.
- Step 2: Sam is matching an unspoken group norm, which is conformity.
- Step 3: It's likely normative social influence, since he's probably trying to fit in with coworkers.
Answer: It's conformity (likely normative), not obedience, because there was no direct command from an authority, only an unspoken group norm.
Common mistakes
- Calling any going-along behavior obedience. Obedience needs a direct order from an authority; conformity is matching a group.
- Mixing up group polarization and groupthink. Polarization makes views more extreme; groupthink is suppressing dissent to keep harmony.
- Saying social facilitation always improves performance. It helps on easy or well-learned tasks and hurts on hard or unfamiliar ones.
- Explaining the bystander effect as people simply being uncaring. The research points to situational causes like diffusion of responsibility and others' calm reactions.
On the exam
- Many multiple-choice items describe one situation and ask which concept it shows. Look for clues: an order (obedience), a group norm (conformity), individual effort hidden (loafing), being watched (facilitation).
- If you're asked to evaluate Milgram's or Asch's research, mention both what the results showed about situations and the ethical concerns about deception and distress.
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself
4 questions on 4.3 Psychology of Social Situations. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
| Number of people giving the wrong answer before the participant | Percent of trials on which participants also gave the wrong answer |
|---|---|
| 1 | 4 |
| 2 | 12 |
| 4 | 30 |
| 8 | 31 |
| 4, plus 1 person who gave the correct answer | 8 |
Hypothetical data; participants judged which of three lines matched a sample line after hearing others, secretly working with the researcher, answer aloud
Which conclusion is best supported by the data?
Based on research on this kind of task, which change would most likely reduce conformity?
In studies where an authority figure orders participants to do something that seems to harm another person, which change has been found to most reduce obedience?
A man collapses on a busy sidewalk. Dozens of people walk past, each assuming someone else has already called for help, and several minutes pass before anyone calls 911. This situation best illustrates
0 of 4 answered