Skip to main content

Unit 2 · Topic 2.2

2.2 Thinking, Problem-Solving, Judgments, and Decision-Making

You think with concepts, prototypes and schemas, and you solve problems with step-by-step algorithms or quick heuristics. Mental shortcuts, mental set, priming, framing and fallacies like the sunk-cost fallacy predictably shape your judgments and decisions. Executive functions help you plan and control your thinking, and creative thinking can be blocked by functional fixedness.

Key terms

  • schema (assimilation and accommodation)
  • algorithm
  • heuristic (availability and representativeness)
  • framing
  • functional fixedness
  • divergent thinking

Concepts, prototypes and schemas

A concept is a mental grouping of similar things, events or people, like 'bird' or 'sport.' A prototype is the best or most typical example of a concept. For many Americans, a robin is a prototype bird, so they'd say 'yes, a robin is a bird' faster than 'yes, a penguin is a bird.'

A schema is a broader framework for organizing information. You can take in new information in two ways. Assimilation means fitting new information into an existing schema without changing it, like a toddler who calls every four-legged animal 'doggy.' Accommodation means changing the schema to fit the new information, like the toddler learning that cows are a separate category. Piaget used these terms for children's development (3.4), but you use them your whole life.

Algorithms and heuristics

An algorithm is a step-by-step method that tries every possibility until it finds the answer. It guarantees a solution but can be slow. Trying every combination on a three-digit lock is an algorithm. A heuristic is a mental shortcut. It's fast and usually works, but it can lead to errors.

  • Representativeness heuristic: judging how likely something is by how well it matches your prototype or stereotype. If you meet a quiet person who loves books, you might guess they're a librarian rather than a salesperson, even though there are far more salespeople. This shortcut can lead to stereotyping.
  • Availability heuristic: judging how likely something is by how easily examples come to mind. After seeing news coverage of a plane crash, people often overestimate the danger of flying, even though driving is far riskier per mile.

Other influences on decisions

  • Mental set: sticking with a method that worked before, even when a better one exists. If you've solved ten math problems with one formula, you may keep using it on an eleventh where it doesn't fit.
  • Priming: earlier exposure to something unconsciously affects how you respond later. Seeing the word 'yellow' makes you faster to recognize 'banana.'
  • Framing: the way a choice is worded changes the decision. People are more likely to choose a surgery described as having a '90% survival rate' than one with a '10% death rate,' even though they're identical.
  • Gambler's fallacy: believing that past random events change the odds of future ones. After five coin flips land heads, many people think tails is 'due,' but the chance is still 50%.
  • Sunk-cost fallacy: continuing something because of what you've already invested (money, time or effort) rather than whether it's worth continuing. Sitting through a terrible movie because you paid for the ticket is a classic example.

Executive functions and creativity

Executive functions are the mental processes that let you set goals, organize, plan, focus, control impulses, switch between tasks and think critically. They depend heavily on the prefrontal cortex, which keeps developing into a person's mid-20s.

Creativity is producing new and useful ideas. It relies on divergent thinking, which generates many possible answers ('How many uses can you think of for a brick?'). Convergent thinking narrows in on one correct answer, as on a multiple-choice test. Both are useful, but creativity depends more on divergent thinking.

Functional fixedness blocks creativity. It is the tendency to see objects only in their usual function. If you need to tighten a screw but don't have a screwdriver, and you never think of using a coin, you're showing functional fixedness.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Telling heuristics and fallacies apart

    Identify the concept in each case. (a) Devon refuses to swim at the beach after watching several shark-attack stories online, although attacks are extremely rare. (b) Priya keeps playing a slot machine because she's lost five times in a row and feels a win is coming. (c) Luis keeps fixing his old car because he's already spent $2,000 on repairs, even though a mechanic says it's not worth it.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: (a) Devon judges the risk by how easily vivid examples come to mind, not by actual frequency. That's the availability heuristic.
    2. Step 2: (b) Priya believes past random outcomes change future odds. Each pull is independent, so this is the gambler's fallacy.
    3. Step 3: (c) Luis continues because of money already spent, not because of future value. That's the sunk-cost fallacy.

    Answer: (a) Availability heuristic, (b) gambler's fallacy, (c) sunk-cost fallacy.

  2. Example 2

    Applying framing in a research scenario

    A researcher randomly assigns 120 students to read about a cafeteria meal described as either '80% fat-free' or '20% fat.' Students who read '80% fat-free' rate the meal as healthier. Identify the independent variable, the dependent variable and the concept shown.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: The researcher changes the wording of the description, so wording ('80% fat-free' versus '20% fat') is the independent variable.
    2. Step 2: The researcher measures health ratings, so that is the dependent variable.
    3. Step 3: The facts are identical; only the presentation changed the judgment. That is framing.
    4. Step 4: Random assignment makes the groups similar at the start, so the difference can be attributed to the framing.

    Answer: Independent variable: how the meal was described. Dependent variable: health ratings. Concept: framing.

Common mistakes

  • Mixing up the availability and representativeness heuristics. Availability is about how easily examples come to mind; representativeness is about how well something matches a prototype.
  • Confusing mental set with functional fixedness. Mental set is sticking with a familiar strategy; functional fixedness is seeing an object only in its usual use.
  • Thinking algorithms are always better. They guarantee an answer but are often impractically slow, which is why people use heuristics.

On the exam

  • Most questions here are scenarios that ask you to pick the exact cognitive concept, so learn a clear everyday example for each term.
  • These biases are easy to turn into experiments, so be ready to identify variables and explain how random assignment supports a causal conclusion.

Connected topics

Videos

  • Thinking, Problem-Solving, Judgments, & Decision Making [AP Psychology Review Unit 2 Topic 2]

    Mr. SinnWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Unit 2A Part 3 Thinking and Problem Solving (Updated 2025)

    Mrs. McCraryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Cognition - How Your Mind Can Amaze and Betray You: Crash Course Psychology #15

    CrashCourseWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Thinking and Problem Solving in Under 3 mins (AP Psychology Unit 2 Topic 2) 2.2

    Maximum InsightWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 2.2 Thinking, Problem-Solving, Judgments, and Decision-Making. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Researchers asked 200 adults to imagine they had a serious illness and to decide whether to have a surgery. Participants were randomly assigned to read one of two descriptions. Half read that "90 out of 100 patients survive the surgery." The other half read that "10 out of 100 patients die from the surgery."

Among participants who read the first description, 82 percent chose the surgery. Among those who read the second, 54 percent chose it. All participants were recruited from introductory psychology classes at one university.

Hypothetical experiment

Question 1 of 4

The difference between the two groups best illustrates

Question 2 of 4

Which is the most important limitation on applying these findings to people in general?

Question 3 of 4

After a summer of heavy news coverage about shark attacks, many beachgoers say they fear sharks more than the drive to the beach, even though they are far more likely to be hurt in a car crash. Which concept best explains their judgment?

Question 4 of 4

Participants read that Sam is quiet, wears glasses and loves poetry, and then judge whether Sam is more likely to be a classics professor or a truck driver. Most pick classics professor, even though truck drivers greatly outnumber classics professors. This error is best explained by

0 of 4 answered