AP® Psychology review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/psych/units/1/1-1)
Unit 1 · Topic 1.1
1.1 Interaction of Heredity and Environment
Every behavior and mental process you have comes from heredity (nature) and environment (nurture) working together, not from one or the other. Psychologists use twin, family and adoption studies to estimate how much genes matter, and the evolutionary perspective asks how a behavior might have helped our ancestors survive and reproduce. This topic also covers how evolutionary ideas were misused to justify discrimination in the eugenics movement.
Key terms
- nature (heredity)
- nurture (environment)
- evolutionary perspective
- twin studies
- adoption studies
- eugenics
Nature, nurture and how they interact
Heredity, or nature, means the traits and tendencies you inherit from your biological parents through your genes. Height, eye color and a tendency toward being shy or outgoing all have a hereditary part. Environment, or nurture, means everything outside you that you experience: your family, your friends, your school, your culture, what you eat and even conditions before birth.
Psychologists today don't ask 'nature or nurture?' They ask how the two interact. Genes set a range of possibilities, and experience decides where in that range you end up. A child may inherit the potential to be tall, but poor nutrition can keep that potential from showing. Genes can also shape your environment: a naturally outgoing child seeks out more social situations, which builds social skills further.
Because the two are so tangled, the best answer on almost any 'is this caused by genes or experience?' question is 'both, and they affect each other.'
The evolutionary perspective
The evolutionary perspective explains behavior through natural selection. Natural selection is the process by which inherited traits that help an organism survive and reproduce become more common over many generations, because the organisms with those traits leave more offspring.
Evolutionary psychologists ask what problem a behavior might have solved for our ancestors. For example, a strong liking for sweet and fatty foods would have helped people survive when calories were scarce. A quick fear of snakes, heights or angry faces would have helped people avoid danger. Today those same tendencies can cause trouble, such as overeating when food is everywhere.
A limit to remember: evolutionary explanations are hard to test directly, because we can't run experiments on our ancestors. A good explanation still needs evidence from present-day research.
How researchers separate genes from environment
These studies are correlational. Researchers can't randomly assign children to families, so they measure how strongly relatives' traits are related. They can show how much genes and environment are associated with a trait, but they can't fully prove cause and effect.
- Twin studies compare identical twins, who share essentially all their genes, with fraternal twins, who share about half on average, like any brothers or sisters. If identical twins are much more alike on a trait than fraternal twins, genes probably play a larger role in that trait.
- Twins raised apart are especially useful. They share genes but not a home, so similarities between them point toward heredity.
- Family studies check whether a trait runs in families, and whether closer relatives are more alike than distant ones. The weakness is that families share homes as well as genes, so the two causes are mixed together (confounded).
- Adoption studies compare adopted children with their biological parents (shared genes) and their adoptive parents (shared environment). Resemblance to biological parents suggests genetic influence; resemblance to adoptive parents suggests environmental influence.
Eugenics: a misuse of science
Eugenics was a movement to 'improve' the human population by encouraging some people to have children and preventing others from doing so. Francis Galton coined the term in 1883. In the early 1900s, eugenic ideas were used to justify forced sterilization laws in the United States, immigration limits aimed at particular groups, and later the horrors of Nazi Germany. These policies targeted people based on race, ethnicity, poverty and disability.
Eugenics is in the course as a warning. Claims about heredity were stretched far beyond the evidence and used to discriminate. You'll see the same pattern again in 2.8, where intelligence test scores were used to limit people's opportunities.
You won't be tested on the details of genetics, such as DNA, chromosomes, genotype versus phenotype, or dominant and recessive genes. Focus on how heredity and environment interact and how researchers study them.
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
Reading a twin study
Researchers measure anxiety levels in 200 pairs of identical twins and 200 pairs of fraternal twins, all raised in their own families. The correlation between twins' anxiety scores is +0.48 for identical twins and +0.22 for fraternal twins. What does this suggest about anxiety, and what is one limitation of the study?
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: Identify the comparison. Identical twins share about twice as much genetic material as fraternal twins, and both kinds of twins share a home.
- Step 2: Compare the correlations. Identical twins are more similar (+0.48) than fraternal twins (+0.22). Since the main difference between the groups is genetic similarity, this points to a genetic influence on anxiety.
- Step 3: Notice what the numbers don't show. Even identical twins correlate well below +1.00, so environment must matter too.
- Step 4: Name a limitation. Identical twins may be treated more alike than fraternal twins (dressed alike, mistaken for each other), so part of their extra similarity might come from environment. Also, because this is correlational, it can't prove that genes cause anxiety.
Answer: The larger correlation for identical twins suggests genes contribute to anxiety, but the correlations below +1.00 show that environment matters as well. A limitation is that identical twins may share more similar environments, which is confounded with their greater genetic similarity.
- Example 2
Applying the evolutionary perspective
Many young children refuse to eat bitter vegetables but readily eat sweet fruit. Explain this with the evolutionary perspective.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: State the perspective's key idea: traits that helped ancestors survive and reproduce were passed on more often through natural selection.
- Step 2: Connect to the scenario. In the past, many poisonous plants tasted bitter, while ripe fruit tasted sweet and gave quick energy.
- Step 3: Explain the link. Children who avoided bitter plants and sought sweet foods were more likely to survive and later have children, so this preference became common.
Answer: Through natural selection, a preference for sweet foods (safe energy) and an avoidance of bitter tastes (possible poison) helped young ancestors survive, so these tendencies became common in humans today.
Common mistakes
- Saying a trait is caused 'by genes' or 'by environment' alone. Exam answers that recognize both, and how they interact, are more accurate.
- Mixing up identical and fraternal twins. Identical twins share essentially all their genes; fraternal twins share about half on average, the same as non-twin siblings.
- Calling twin or adoption studies experiments. Researchers can't randomly assign people to families, so these are correlational designs.
- Treating eugenics as legitimate evolutionary science. It was a misuse of evolutionary ideas to discriminate against groups of people.
On the exam
- Expect scenarios where you identify the research design (twin, family or adoption study) and explain what its results suggest about genes and environment.
- When asked to apply the evolutionary perspective, always name survival or reproductive advantage, not just 'it's natural.'
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself
4 questions on 1.1 Interaction of Heredity and Environment. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
| Pair type | Number of pairs | Correlation between the two members' anxiety scores |
|---|---|---|
| Identical twins raised together | 210 | +0.52 |
| Fraternal twins raised together | 190 | +0.24 |
| Identical twins raised apart | 45 | +0.48 |
| Unrelated children raised together | 120 | +0.05 |
Hypothetical data; both members of each pair completed the same anxiety questionnaire
Which conclusion is best supported by the data?
Which feature of the data best shows that environmental factors also influence anxiety?
The correlation of +0.05 for unrelated children raised together indicates that
A psychologist notes that people across many cultures find sweet, high-calorie foods appealing. Which explanation best reflects the evolutionary perspective?
0 of 4 answered