Skip to main content

Evidence-Based Question (EBQ)

Can test scores change?

  • Unit 2
  • 7 points
  • About 45 minutes

You read summaries of three studies on one topic, make a claim that answers the question, then back it up twice with evidence from two different sources, explaining each piece of evidence with a different psychology concept. On the exam: Question 2 of 2 in the 70-minute free-response section (Section II); 7 points, 16.65% of the exam score. About 45 minutes, including 15 minutes to read.

The question and its sources

Read the three sources, then answer Parts A, B and C. In Parts B and C you must cite the source you use, either in parentheses, as in '(Source 1)', or in your sentence, as in 'According to Source 2, ...'. Write in complete sentences and use psychological terms. Question: Using the sources, develop and justify an argument about whether people's scores on intelligence and achievement tests can be changed by their environment and beliefs.

Source 1

Introduction: Researchers tested whether reminding people of a belief that their group does poorly on a test affects how well they perform.

Participants: 120 women at a large public university who had completed a calculus course and rated math as important to them. Their mean age was 19.6. They reported their race/ethnicity as 48% White, 22% Asian, 17% Hispanic or Latino and 13% Black.

Method: Each participant took the same difficult 20-question math test alone. Participants were randomly assigned to read one of two descriptions before starting. Condition A said: 'This test has shown differences between men's and women's scores in past research.' Condition B said: 'This test has been shown to be fair; men and women have scored equally in past research.' Afterward, participants were told the true purpose of the study.

Results and Discussion: Women in Condition A answered a mean of 41% of the questions correctly, compared with 58% for women in Condition B, a statistically significant difference. Women in Condition A also reported more worry during the test.

Source: Hypothetical study summary, written for practice (not a real published study)

Source 2

Introduction: Researchers tested whether a short online lesson about the brain could change students' grades.

Participants: About 6,300 ninth-grade students at 40 public high schools across the United States took part with parental consent. The schools served a wide range of communities, and 43% of the students came from low-income families.

Method: In the fall, students were randomly assigned to complete two 25-minute online lessons. The experimental lessons taught that the brain forms stronger connections when people work on challenging problems, and that ability can grow with effort and good strategies. The control lessons taught facts about brain functions without saying anything about whether ability can change. Researchers collected each student's end-of-year grade point average (GPA) on a 0–4 scale.

Results and Discussion: Students who completed the experimental lessons earned slightly higher GPAs than students in the control group (a difference of 0.05 points; statistically significant, with a small effect size of 0.06). Among students who started high school with lower grades, the difference was larger (2.48 versus 2.37). Students in the experimental group were also more likely to sign up for harder math courses the next year.

Source: Hypothetical study summary, written for practice (not a real published study)

Source 3

Introduction: Researchers examined average scores on the same reasoning test across several generations in one country.

Participants: Test records for about 500,000 18-year-old men who took a reasoning test as part of required military registration in one European country between 1952 and 2002. Women were not tested.

Method: Every year, registrants took the same nonverbal reasoning test. Researchers rescaled the scores so that the 1952 average was 100 and compared average scores across years. They also gathered national records on schooling and average adult height, a common sign of childhood nutrition.

Results and Discussion: Average scores rose steadily (see the table). Because a population's genes change very little in 50 years, the researchers concluded that changes in the environment, such as better nutrition, more years of schooling and higher family incomes, were the most likely causes.

Source: Hypothetical study summary, written for practice (not a real published study)

Source 3 table: Reasoning scores across generations

Year testedAverage score (1952 average = 100)Average years of schoolingAverage adult height (cm)
19521008.1172
19621058.9174
19721109.8176
198211410.7178
199211711.4179
200211912.0180

Source: Hypothetical data

Suggested time: 45 minutes

Your answers are saved in this browser as you type.

Part (a)

1 point

Make a specific, defensible claim, grounded in psychological science, that answers the question.

0 / 2,500 characters

Part (b)

3 points

(i) Drawing on one of the sources, give at least one specific, relevant piece of evidence that backs your claim. (ii) Explain how the evidence you gave in B(i) backs your claim by applying a perspective, theory, concept or research finding from AP Psychology.

0 / 2,500 characters

Part (c)

3 points

(i) Drawing on a different source from the one you used in Part B, give another specific, relevant piece of evidence that backs your claim. (ii) Explain how the evidence you gave in C(i) backs your claim by applying a perspective, theory, concept or research finding from AP Psychology that is different from the one you used in Part B(ii).

0 / 2,500 characters

Checking scoring…

Scoring it yourself shows you the rubric, examples and a model answer. Try writing your answer first.