Evidence-Based Question (EBQ)
Digital devices and memory
- Unit 2
- 7 points
- About 45 minutes
You read summaries of three studies on one topic, make a claim that answers the question, then back it up twice with evidence from two different sources, explaining each piece of evidence with a different psychology concept. On the exam: Question 2 of 2 in the 70-minute free-response section (Section II); 7 points, 16.65% of the exam score. About 45 minutes, including 15 minutes to read.
The question and its sources
Read the three sources, then answer Parts A, B and C. In Parts B and C you must cite the source you use, either in parentheses, as in '(Source 1)', or in your sentence, as in 'According to Source 2, ...'. Write in complete sentences and use psychological terms. Question: Using the sources, develop and justify an argument about whether using digital devices helps or harms people's memory for what they are trying to learn.
Source 1
Introduction: Researchers studied whether taking photos of objects affects how well people remember them.
Participants: Ninety undergraduate students (61 women and 29 men, aged 18 to 23) at a university in the northeastern United States took part for course credit. Race/ethnicity was not reported.
Method: Participants took a guided tour of a university art museum. At each of 20 objects, the guide told them either to photograph the object with a smartphone or simply to look at it carefully. Each participant photographed 10 objects and looked at the other 10; which objects were photographed was randomly decided for each participant. Participants spent the same amount of time, 30 seconds, at every object. The next day, without seeing their photos, they wrote down the names of as many objects as they could remember and answered questions about details of each object (for example, 'What was the statue holding in its left hand?').
Results and Discussion: Participants recalled the names of fewer photographed objects than looked-at objects (a mean of 4.1 versus 5.6 out of 10) and answered fewer detail questions correctly about photographed objects (54% versus 68%). Both differences were statistically significant. Many participants said they 'didn't need to remember' the objects they had photographed.
Source: Hypothetical study summary, written for practice (not a real published study)
Source 2
Introduction: Researchers compared taking lecture notes on a laptop with taking notes by hand.
Participants: 120 eleventh-grade students (63 girls and 57 boys) from three high schools in California took part with parental consent. Parents reported their race/ethnicity as 41% Hispanic or Latino, 30% White, 18% Asian, 7% Black and 4% multiracial.
Method: Students were randomly assigned to take notes on a laptop or by hand while watching a 20-minute recorded lecture about the history of vaccines. Researchers counted how much of each student's notes copied the lecture word for word. One week later, students reviewed their own notes for 10 minutes and then took a test with factual questions (such as the year an event happened) and conceptual questions that required explaining or applying ideas from the lecture.
Results and Discussion: Laptop notes were longer (mean of 310 words versus 190 words) and contained more word-for-word copying (14% versus 6% of words). On factual questions, the two groups scored about the same (laptop 70% correct, handwritten 69%). On conceptual questions, students who took notes by hand scored higher (62% versus 51%), a statistically significant difference.
Source: Hypothetical study summary, written for practice (not a real published study)
Source 3
Introduction: Researchers tested whether a quiz app helps students remember what they read better than rereading on a screen.
Participants: 84 college students (50 women and 34 men) enrolled in an introductory biology course at a community college in Texas. Race/ethnicity was not reported.
Method: Each student studied two textbook passages of equal difficulty on a tablet, spending 20 minutes on each. For one passage (randomly chosen), the student read it and then reread it on the screen. For the other, the student read it and then used an app that asked short-answer questions about it and showed the correct answer after each attempt. Three days later, students took a test with new questions about both passages.
Results and Discussion: Students answered 71% of questions correctly about the passages they had studied with the quiz app, compared with 52% about the passages they had reread. Right after studying, however, 68% of students predicted they would remember the reread passage better.
Source: Hypothetical study summary, written for practice (not a real published study)
Suggested time: 45 minutes
Your answers are saved in this browser as you type.
Part (a)
1 pointMake a specific, defensible claim, grounded in psychological science, that answers the question.
0 / 2,500 characters
Part (b)
3 points(i) Drawing on one of the sources, give at least one specific, relevant piece of evidence that backs your claim. (ii) Explain how the evidence you gave in B(i) backs your claim by applying a perspective, theory, concept or research finding from AP Psychology.
0 / 2,500 characters
Part (c)
3 points(i) Drawing on a different source from the one you used in Part B, give another specific, relevant piece of evidence that backs your claim. (ii) Explain how the evidence you gave in C(i) backs your claim by applying a perspective, theory, concept or research finding from AP Psychology that is different from the one you used in Part B(ii).
0 / 2,500 characters
Checking scoring…
Scoring it yourself shows you the rubric, examples and a model answer. Try writing your answer first.