Skip to main content

Article Analysis Question (AAQ)

Seeing a new use for drinking water

  • Unit 2
  • 7 points
  • About 25 minutes

You read a summary of one research study and answer six short parts about it: the research method, a variable, what a statistic shows, an ethical guideline, whether the results generalize, and whether the findings support a psychology idea. On the exam: Question 1 of 2 in the 70-minute free-response section (Section II); 7 points, 16.65% of the exam score. About 25 minutes, including 10 minutes to read.

The question and its sources

Read the study summary, then answer all six parts, A through F. Write each answer in complete sentences and use psychological terms where they fit.

Source

Introduction: Solving a problem sometimes means using an everyday object in an unusual way. Researchers tested whether presenting an object in its ordinary role makes it harder for people to think of a new use for it.

Participants: Eighty-four adults aged 19 to 63 (mean age = 34; 47 women, 36 men and 1 nonbinary person) were recruited at a public library in Melbourne, Australia, and received a $10 book voucher. Most (71%) had been born in Australia; the rest had been born in 14 other countries. People who said they had seen the puzzle before were not included.

Method: Participants gave written informed consent and were told they could stop at any time. Each was tested alone. A clear plastic tube, 40 cm tall and too narrow for a hand, was fixed upright to a table, with a table-tennis ball resting at the bottom. The participant's task was to get the ball out without tipping or damaging the tube. The only workable solution was to pour water into the tube so that the ball floated to the top. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions (42 per condition).

Neutral condition: A plastic jug of water sat on the table among the other items available for the task (a pencil, a ruler, string, tape and a paper clip).

Drinking-water condition: The same items were on the table, but the water was in a drinking glass on a small tray with a napkin and a cookie, placed next to the participant. The researcher said, "Here's a glass of water and a snack for you while you work."

The researcher, who sat behind a screen, recorded the time in seconds from the start of the task until the participant began pouring water into the tube. Participants who had not solved the puzzle after 10 minutes were stopped and given a time of 600 seconds. Afterward, the researcher showed every participant the solution, explained the purpose of the study, and recorded no names with the data.

Results and Discussion: The table shows the results. The difference between the conditions in the percentage of participants who solved the puzzle was statistically significant. Many participants in the drinking-water condition said afterward that they had not thought of the water as one of the tools.

Source: Hypothetical study summary, written for practice (not a real published study)

Solution times by condition

ConditionNumber of participantsSolved within 10 minutesMean solution time (seconds)Median solution time (seconds)
Neutral4238 (90%)202128
Drinking-water4223 (55%)442518

Source: Hypothetical data

Suggested time: 25 minutes

Your answers are saved in this browser as you type.

Something wrong with this question?

What's wrong?

Please don't include personal details.

Part (a)

1 point

Identify the research method used in the study.

0 / 2,500 characters

Part (b)

1 point

State the operational definition of problem-solving speed used in the study.

0 / 2,500 characters

Part (c)

1 point

Describe what the mean and the median indicate about the distribution of solution times in the neutral condition.

0 / 2,500 characters

Part (d)

1 point

Identify at least one ethical guideline the researchers applied in this study.

0 / 2,500 characters

Part (e)

1 point

Explain how far the study's findings can or cannot be generalized, using specific, relevant evidence from the study.

0 / 2,500 characters

Part (f)

2 points

Explain how at least one finding from the study supports or refutes the idea that functional fixedness can hinder problem solving.

0 / 2,500 characters

Checking scoring…

Scoring it yourself shows you the rubric, examples and a model answer. Try writing your answer first.