Skip to main content

Article Analysis Question (AAQ)

Caffeine, placebos and reaction time

  • Unit 1
  • 7 points
  • About 25 minutes

You read a summary of one research study and answer six short parts about it: the research method, a variable, what a statistic shows, an ethical guideline, whether the results generalize, and whether the findings support a psychology idea. On the exam: Question 1 of 2 in the 70-minute free-response section (Section II); 7 points, 16.65% of the exam score. About 25 minutes, including 10 minutes to read.

The question and its sources

Read the study summary, then answer all six parts, A through F. Write each answer in complete sentences and use psychological terms where they fit.

Source

Introduction: Caffeine is a stimulant, a drug that typically increases activity in the nervous system. Researchers tested whether a dose of caffeine makes people respond faster, whether simply believing you have had caffeine has the same effect, and whether people who use caffeine every day get less benefit from a dose than people who rarely use it.

Participants: Ninety adults aged 18 to 30 (48 women and 42 men) living in a mid-sized city in Canada responded to online advertisements and were paid $25. They described their race/ethnicity as 52% White, 21% East Asian, 14% South Asian, 8% Black and 5% another group. On a screening questionnaire, 45 participants reported consuming at least 300 mg of caffeine every day (about three cups of coffee); they formed the daily-user group. The other 45 reported consuming less than 50 mg per day; they formed the light-user group. People with heart conditions, high blood pressure or an anxiety disorder, and people who were pregnant, were not allowed to take part.

Method: A university research ethics board approved the study. Before agreeing to take part, participants read and signed a consent form explaining that they might swallow a capsule containing caffeine (200 mg, about the amount in two cups of coffee) or a capsule with no active ingredient, and that they could stop at any time. All participants were asked to have no caffeine after 8:00 p.m. the evening before their 9:00 a.m. session.

Within each user group, participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions (15 people per condition in each user group): a caffeine capsule, a placebo capsule that looked and tasted identical but contained no caffeine, or no capsule. For the two capsule conditions, neither the participant nor the researcher running the session knew which capsule had been given.

Forty-five minutes after the capsule (or after arriving, for the no-capsule condition), participants completed a 10-minute task in which a light appeared on a screen at unpredictable moments 100 times. They pressed a button as soon as they saw the light. Alertness was measured as each participant's mean reaction time, in milliseconds (ms), across the 100 trials; lower times mean faster responding. At the end of the session, participants were told which condition they had been in and why a placebo was used.

Results and Discussion: Mean reaction times are shown in the table. For light users, the caffeine condition responded faster than the placebo condition, and this difference was statistically significant (p < .01). For daily users, the caffeine condition was also slightly faster than the placebo condition, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = .19). In neither user group was the difference between the placebo and no-capsule conditions statistically significant. The researchers concluded that people who use caffeine every day may get less benefit from the same dose.

Source: Hypothetical study summary, written for practice (not a real published study)

Mean reaction time in milliseconds (lower = faster)

ConditionLight usersDaily users
Caffeine capsule268291
Placebo capsule301302
No capsule306305

Source: Hypothetical data

Suggested time: 25 minutes

Your answers are saved in this browser as you type.

Something wrong with this question?

What's wrong?

Please don't include personal details.

Part (a)

1 point

Identify the research method used in the study.

0 / 2,500 characters

Part (b)

1 point

State the operational definition of alertness used in the study.

0 / 2,500 characters

Part (c)

1 point

Describe what the statistical significance of the difference between the caffeine and placebo conditions indicates for the light users.

0 / 2,500 characters

Part (d)

1 point

Identify at least one ethical guideline the researchers applied in this study.

0 / 2,500 characters

Part (e)

1 point

Explain how far the study's findings can or cannot be generalized, using specific, relevant evidence from the study.

0 / 2,500 characters

Part (f)

2 points

Explain how at least one finding from the study supports or refutes the idea that regular use of a psychoactive drug can lead to tolerance.

0 / 2,500 characters

Checking scoring…

Scoring it yourself shows you the rubric, examples and a model answer. Try writing your answer first.