Article Analysis Question (AAQ)
Gratitude letters and well-being
- Unit 5
- 7 points
- About 25 minutes
You read a summary of one research study and answer six short parts about it: the research method, a variable, what a statistic shows, an ethical guideline, whether the results generalize, and whether the findings support a psychology idea. On the exam: Question 1 of 2 in the 70-minute free-response section (Section II); 7 points, 16.65% of the exam score. About 25 minutes, including 10 minutes to read.
The question and its sources
Read the study summary, then answer all six parts, A through F. Write each answer in complete sentences and use psychological terms where they fit.
Source
Introduction: Positive psychologists study what helps people flourish. In this study, researchers tested whether regularly writing letters of gratitude increases well-being, and how long any effect lasts.
Participants: Two hundred forty adults aged 18 to 70 (mean age = 38) living in the United States signed up through a university research website advertised on social media. There were 151 women and 89 men. Participants reported their race/ethnicity as 70% White, 12% Black, 9% Hispanic or Latino, 6% Asian and 3% multiracial. Adults who were currently receiving treatment for depression were not eligible. Participants were not paid.
Method: A university institutional review board approved the study. Participants gave informed consent online, and their responses were stored under ID numbers. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions (120 people each). Once a week for 4 weeks, they logged in and wrote for 15 minutes.
Gratitude condition: Participants wrote a letter to a specific person they had never properly thanked, describing what the person did and how it affected them. They did not have to send the letters.
Control condition: Participants described what they had done that day, without including feelings or opinions.
Before the study began (baseline), at the end of week 4 and at week 12, participants completed a 10-item well-being questionnaire (for example, 'I am satisfied with my life'), rating each item from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Each person's well-being score was the average of the 10 ratings, from 1 to 7. At the end of the study, all participants were told the study's purpose, control participants were offered the gratitude-letter instructions, and everyone received a list of free, confidential support services.
Results and Discussion: The table shows the results. At week 4, the difference between the two conditions was statistically significant (p < .01), with an effect size of 0.40. At week 12, the difference was not statistically significant (p = .25). Eighty-five percent of participants completed all three questionnaires.
Source: Hypothetical study summary, written for practice (not a real published study)
Mean well-being scores (1–7 scale)
| Condition | Number of participants | Baseline | Week 4 | Week 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gratitude letters | 120 | 4.6 | 5.2 | 4.9 |
| Control | 120 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.7 |
Source: Hypothetical data
Suggested time: 25 minutes
Your answers are saved in this browser as you type.
Part (a)
1 pointIdentify the research method the researchers used.
0 / 2,500 characters
Part (b)
1 pointState the operational definition of well-being used in the study.
0 / 2,500 characters
Part (c)
1 pointDescribe what the effect size of 0.40 indicates about the difference between the two conditions at week 4.
0 / 2,500 characters
Part (d)
1 pointIdentify at least one ethical guideline the researchers applied in this study.
0 / 2,500 characters
Part (e)
1 pointExplain how far the study's findings can or cannot be generalized, using specific, relevant evidence from the study.
0 / 2,500 characters
Part (f)
2 pointsExplain how at least one finding from the study supports or refutes the claim that expressing gratitude increases subjective well-being.
0 / 2,500 characters
Checking scoring…
Scoring it yourself shows you the rubric, examples and a model answer. Try writing your answer first.