AP® English Literature and Composition review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/lit/units/1/1-5)
Unit 1 · Topic 1.5
1.5 Who is telling the story
Every story is told by a narrator, and every poem by a speaker. That voice is a creation of the author, not the author speaking directly. Asking who is telling the story, what they know and how much you can trust them changes how you read everything they say.
Key terms
- narrator
- speaker
- author
- reliability
- unreliable narrator
- bias
The narrator is not the author
Edgar Allan Poe wrote stories narrated by murderers. He wasn't one. Writers invent narrators the way they invent characters, so the narrator's opinions, mistakes and lies belong to the narrator.
In your writing, say "the narrator" or "the speaker," not the author's name, when you mean the voice telling the story. Use the author's name when you mean the choices behind the text: "Poe gives his narrator a frantic, broken rhythm."
The narrator's relationship with you
A narrator doesn't just report events. They set up a relationship with the reader. Some talk to you directly, even calling you "you." Some sound like a friend sharing gossip. Some keep you at arm's length. That relationship shapes how much you sympathize with the people in the story.
Notice moments when a narrator addresses you, argues with you or tries to convince you of something. A narrator who works hard to win you over often has something to hide.
Reliability
A reliable narrator gives you an account you can mostly trust. An unreliable narrator gives you one you can't, at least not completely. Unreliability comes in different kinds:
- Limited: a child or an outsider who reports accurately but doesn't understand what they see.
- Biased: someone with strong feelings about the other characters, who bends the story to fit them.
- Self-deceiving: someone who can't admit an uncomfortable truth to themselves.
- Disturbed or deceptive: someone whose grip on reality, or on the truth, is shaky.
Clues that a narrator can't be trusted
Finding these clues is the skill. Once you spot the gap between what the narrator says and what the story shows, you can explain what the story is really about.
- They insist they're calm, sane or fair a little too often.
- Their account contradicts itself, or their actions contradict their words.
- Other characters react in ways that don't fit the narrator's version.
- They leave obvious gaps, skip over key moments or change the subject.
- Their judgments seem extreme for the evidence they give.
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
A narrator who protests too much
Edgar Allan Poe's "The Tell-Tale Heart" (1843) opens: "True!—nervous—very, very dreadfully nervous I had been and am; but why will you say that I am mad? The disease had sharpened my senses—not destroyed—not dulled them. Above all was the sense of hearing acute. I heard all things in the heaven and in the earth. I heard many things in hell. How, then, am I mad? Hearken! and observe how healthily—how calmly I can tell you the whole story." How does Poe make this narrator unreliable from the first lines?
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: Notice who he's talking to. He argues with "you," a listener who has apparently called him mad. The story begins as a defense.
- Step 2: Compare his claims with his style. He promises to tell the story "calmly," but the sentences are broken by dashes and exclamations. The form contradicts the claim.
- Step 3: Look at what he offers as proof. He says he "heard all things in the heaven and in the earth" and "many things in hell." Claims like that undercut his argument that he's sane.
- Step 4: Turn the gap into a claim about the effect on the reader.
Answer: Model paragraph: Poe makes his narrator unreliable before the story even begins by letting his manner argue against his words. He insists that he can tell the story "healthily" and "calmly," yet the sentence that makes the promise is chopped up by dashes and an excited "Hearken!" His proof of sanity is even stranger: he claims he "heard all things in the heaven and in the earth" and "many things in hell." Each attempt to convince "you" that he is not mad becomes evidence that he is, so the reader learns to read against him from the first line, watching for what his own account gives away.
Common mistakes
- Using the author's name when you mean the narrator. "Poe is nervous" is wrong; "the narrator insists he's calm" is right.
- Calling every first-person narrator unreliable. Being involved in the story limits what a narrator knows, but that doesn't make them untrustworthy.
- Stopping at "the narrator is unreliable." Explain what the unreliability reveals or how it changes the reader's response.
On the exam
- Multiple-choice questions often ask about a narrator's attitude or what the narrator "reveals" without meaning to. The answer is usually the one that sees past the narrator's own claims.
- In essays, contrasting what a narrator says with what the details show is a reliable way to build strong commentary.
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself
4 questions on 1.5 Who is telling the story. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
James Joyce, “Araby,” from Dubliners (1914)
Which of the following best describes the narrator of the passage?
The narrator's remarks that his eyes filled with tears “(I could not tell why)” and that he spoke in “strange prayers and praises which I myself did not understand” mainly emphasize
Katherine Mansfield, “Miss Brill” (1920), from The Garden Party, and Other Stories (1922)
In paragraph 3, the narrator reports that Miss Brill had become “really quite expert, she thought, at listening as though she didn’t listen.” The words “she thought” mainly serve to
Sarah Orne Jewett, “A White Heron” (1886)
In paragraph 5, the narrator suddenly uses the present tense (“Suddenly this little woods-girl is horror-stricken”) and calls the young man “The enemy.” These choices mainly
0 of 4 answered