Skip to main content

Unit 3 · Topic 3.11

3.11 Government Responses to Social Movements

Government has responded to social movements with both court rulings and new laws. Brown v. Board of Education (1954) ruled that segregated public schools violate equal protection; the Civil Rights Act of 1964 banned discrimination in public places and employment; the Voting Rights Act of 1965 attacked racial barriers to voting; and Title IX (1972) banned sex discrimination in federally funded education. Each shows a different branch acting.

Key terms

  • Brown v. Board of Education
  • Civil Rights Act of 1964
  • Voting Rights Act of 1965
  • Title IX

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

Facts: Linda Brown, a Black third-grader in Topeka, Kansas, had to travel much farther to a segregated school than to a nearby white school. Her case was combined with similar cases from other states. Thurgood Marshall of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund led the challenge.

Holding: A unanimous Court, led by Chief Justice Earl Warren, ruled that state laws segregating public schools by race violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.

Reasoning: Separating children by race creates a feeling of inferiority that affects their hearts and minds and harms their education, so “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.” The Court drew on psychological research about the effects of segregation. It rejected the “separate but equal” doctrine of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) for public education.

Significance: Brown was a landmark for civil rights, but enforcement was slow. A follow-up ruling in 1955 told schools to desegregate “with all deliberate speed,” a vague standard many Southern officials used to delay. In 1957, President Eisenhower sent federal troops to Little Rock, Arkansas, to enforce a desegregation order. Brown also shows the limits of courts: they depend on the other branches to carry out their rulings.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964

Pushed by the civil rights movement and championed by President Lyndon Johnson, the act survived a filibuster in the Senate that lasted about two months before cloture was won. Key parts:

  • Title II: bans discrimination by race, color, religion or national origin in public accommodations such as hotels, restaurants and theaters.
  • Titles III and IV: let the Justice Department sue to desegregate public facilities and public schools.
  • Title VI: bars discrimination in programs that receive federal money.
  • Title VII: bans job discrimination by race, color, religion, sex or national origin, and created the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to enforce it.

Constitutional basis

Congress relied on its Commerce Clause power, because private businesses' discrimination affected interstate travel and trade. The Court upheld this in Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964), connecting this topic to federalism (1.8).

The Voting Rights Act of 1965

In March 1965, state troopers attacked peaceful marchers in Selma, Alabama, on a day that became known as Bloody Sunday. Televised images built support, and Congress passed the Voting Rights Act that summer. It suspended literacy tests in places with histories of discrimination, sent federal examiners to register voters, and required covered jurisdictions to get federal approval (preclearance) before changing voting rules. Black voter registration rose sharply; in Mississippi it went from roughly 7 percent of eligible Black adults in 1964 to about 60 percent by 1967.

In Shelby County v. Holder (2013), the Court struck down the formula that decided which places needed preclearance, ruling it was based on outdated data. Without a new formula from Congress, preclearance stopped operating; other parts of the act remain.

Title IX (1972)

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 bans sex discrimination in any education program that receives federal funds, which covers nearly all schools and colleges. Its best-known effect has been the huge growth of girls' and women's sports, but it also covers admissions, hiring and harassment. Like Title VI, it uses federal money as leverage, a form of fiscal federalism (1.7).

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Quantitative analysis: voter registration

    A table shows the share of eligible Black adults registered to vote in Mississippi: about 7% in 1964 and about 60% in 1967. Describe the trend and explain one law that helps account for it.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Describe the trend using the data: registration rose from about 7% to about 60%, an increase of roughly 53 percentage points in three years.
    2. Step 2: Identify the cause: the Voting Rights Act of 1965 suspended literacy tests and sent federal examiners to register voters in places like Mississippi.
    3. Step 3: Explain the link: removing discriminatory tests and putting federal officials in charge of registration let many Black citizens register who had been blocked before.

    Answer: Registration rose by roughly 53 percentage points. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 removed literacy tests and brought federal registrars, which opened registration to Black Mississippians who had been excluded.

Common mistakes

  • Saying Brown immediately ended school segregation. Implementation was slow and met heavy resistance for years.
  • Mixing up the laws: the Civil Rights Act targets discrimination in public places, jobs and federal programs; the Voting Rights Act targets voting; Title IX targets sex discrimination in education.
  • Forgetting the Commerce Clause basis of the Civil Rights Act. Questions may connect it to Congress's commerce power.

On the exam

  • Brown v. Board of Education is a required case. Know its holding, its rejection of Plessy and the problems with enforcing it.
  • Expect questions comparing judicial and legislative responses to movements. Brown shows the courts acting; the 1964 and 1965 acts show Congress.

Connected topics

Videos

  • AP Gov 3.10 & 3.11 | Social Movements & Equal Protection | NEW!

    Carey LaMannaWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Brown v. Board of Education, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Review, Required Supreme Court Cases]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Topic 3.11 Government Response to Social Movements AP Government

    Carey LaMannaWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Balancing MAJORITY and MINORITY Rights [AP Gov Review, Unit 3 Topics 11 & 12 (3.11-12)]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka | US government and civics | Khan Academy

    Khan AcademyWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Sex Discrimination: Crash Course Government and Politics #30

    CrashCourseWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

5 questions on 3.11 Government Responses to Social Movements. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

School yearBlack students attending school with any white classmates (%)
19550
19601
19642
196825
197285

Hypothetical data for one southern state, modeled on the general national pattern

Question 1 of 5

Which statement is best supported by the data?

Question 2 of 5

Which development best explains the pattern in the data after 1964?

Question 3 of 5

A public university that receives federal money offers many more athletic scholarships and teams for men than for women, and a group of female students files a complaint. Which law most directly supports their complaint?

YearVoting-age Black residents registered to vote (%)Voting-age white residents registered to vote (%)
1960570
1964772
19685875

Hypothetical data for one southern state, modeled on the general pattern in the Deep South

Question 4 of 5

Which development best explains the change in the table between 1964 and 1968?

Question 5 of 5

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed mainly to enforce which constitutional amendment?

0 of 5 answered