SCOTUS comparison
United States v. Morrison and United States v. Lopez
- Unit 1
- 4 points
- About 20 minutes
You compare a Supreme Court case you haven't studied with one of the required cases, explaining how the required case helps you understand the new one. On the exam: Question 3 of 4 in the free-response section (1 hour 40 minutes for all four, 50% of your score).
The question and its sources
This question asks you to compare a required Supreme Court case with a case you probably haven't studied. Everything you need to know about the second case is in the summary below. Read it and answer parts A, B, and C.
United States v. Morrison (2000)
In 1994, Congress passed the Violence Against Women Act. One provision allowed victims of violent crimes motivated by gender to sue their attackers for money damages in federal court. Before passing the law, Congress held hearings and gathered extensive evidence that this kind of violence cost the national economy billions of dollars a year, partly by discouraging victims from traveling, working, and doing business across state lines.
Christy Brzonkala, a student at Virginia Tech, alleged that two other students had assaulted her, and she sued them in federal court under the new provision. The defendants argued that Congress had no constitutional authority to create it.
In a 5–4 decision, the Supreme Court agreed with the defendants. The majority held that gender-motivated violence is not economic activity and that its effects on interstate commerce were too indirect to justify federal regulation, even with Congress's findings. The Court said that punishing and providing remedies for violent crime is a power traditionally held by the states. It also rejected the argument that the Fourteenth Amendment gave Congress this power, because that amendment limits the actions of state governments, not private individuals.
Source: Case summary written for this question, based on United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000)
Suggested time: 20 minutes
Your answers are saved in this browser as you type.
Part (a)
1 pointIdentify the constitutional clause that is common to both United States v. Morrison (2000) and United States v. Lopez (1995).
0 / 2,500 characters
Part (b)
2 pointsBased on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain how the facts of United States v. Lopez and United States v. Morrison led to similar holdings.
0 / 2,500 characters
Part (c)
1 pointExplain how the holding in United States v. Morrison affects the balance of power between the national government and the states.
0 / 2,500 characters
Checking scoring…
Scoring it yourself shows you the rubric, examples and a model answer. Try writing your answer first.