Skip to main content

SCOTUS comparison

Argersinger v. Hamlin and Gideon v. Wainwright

  • Unit 3
  • 4 points
  • About 20 minutes

You compare a Supreme Court case you haven't studied with one of the required cases, explaining how the required case helps you understand the new one. On the exam: Question 3 of 4 in the free-response section (1 hour 40 minutes for all four, 50% of your score).

The question and its sources

This question asks you to compare a required Supreme Court case with a case you probably haven't studied. Everything you need to know about the second case is in the summary below. Read it and answer parts A, B, and C.

Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972)

Jon Argersinger, who could not afford a lawyer, was charged in Florida with carrying a concealed weapon. The offense was a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail, a $1,000 fine, or both. He was tried before a judge without a lawyer, convicted, and sentenced to 90 days in jail.

Argersinger argued that, because he had no lawyer, he could not properly present the defenses he might have had. The Florida Supreme Court rejected his claim. It ruled that the right to a court-appointed lawyer applied only to people charged with serious offenses punishable by more than six months in prison.

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously reversed. The Court held that, unless a defendant knowingly gives up the right, no person may be imprisoned for any offense, whether it is called petty, a misdemeanor, or a felony, unless he was represented by a lawyer at trial. The majority pointed to the huge number of misdemeanor cases and to evidence that defendants without lawyers were much less likely to have their charges dismissed. Even a short jail sentence, it said, can have serious consequences for a person's job and reputation.

Source: Case summary written for this question, based on Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 (1972)

Suggested time: 20 minutes

Your answers are saved in this browser as you type.

Something wrong with this question?

What's wrong?

Please don't include personal details.

Part (a)

1 point

Identify the constitutional provision that is common to both Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972) and Gideon v. Wainwright (1963).

0 / 2,500 characters

Part (b)

2 points

Based on the constitutional provision identified in part A, explain how the facts of Gideon v. Wainwright and Argersinger v. Hamlin led to similar holdings.

0 / 2,500 characters

Part (c)

1 point

Explain how the holding in Argersinger v. Hamlin affects state and local governments.

0 / 2,500 characters

Checking scoring…

Scoring it yourself shows you the rubric, examples and a model answer. Try writing your answer first.