AP® Human Geography review sheet from Aim for Five (aimforfive.com/geo/units/4/4-6)
Unit 4 · Topic 4.6
4.6 Internal Boundaries
Inside countries, boundaries divide states, counties, cities and voting districts. How voting districts are drawn can change who wins elections, which is why redistricting and gerrymandering matter at local, state and national scales.
Key terms
- voting district
- reapportionment
- redistricting
- gerrymandering
- packing
- cracking
Internal boundaries
Countries divide their territory into internal units like states, provinces, counties, cities and school districts. These boundaries decide who pays which taxes, which schools children attend and who represents whom. Some internal boundaries are drawn to manage diversity: Nigeria has grown from three regions at independence to 36 states, partly to balance its ethnic groups, and India redrew many state lines along language lines in the 1950s.
Reapportionment and redistricting in the U.S.
The U.S. House of Representatives has 435 seats. After each 10-year census, the seats are reapportioned, or shared out, among the states by population (topic 1.3). Each state then redraws its district lines, which is called redistricting.
Districts must have nearly equal populations, a rule known as “one person, one vote,” which the Supreme Court set out in the 1960s. Under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, courts have struck down maps that weakened the voting power of racial or language minorities, though how far that protection reaches has been argued in recent Supreme Court cases. In most states the legislature draws the lines, while some states, including Arizona, Colorado, Michigan and Washington, use independent or bipartisan commissions. Redistricting usually happens once a decade, but some states have redrawn their maps mid-decade, as several states led by each major party did in 2025.
Gerrymandering
Gerrymandering is drawing district lines to give an advantage to one political party or group. The name comes from Massachusetts governor Elbridge Gerry, who in 1812 signed a map that included a district a newspaper said looked like a salamander.
There are two main techniques. Packing crowds the other side's voters into a few districts, so they win those by huge margins and waste votes. Cracking splits the other side's voters across many districts, so they fall short of a majority in each. Both major U.S. parties have used gerrymandering when they controlled the process.
The courts have set limits. In Shaw v. Reno (1993), the Supreme Court allowed challenges to districts drawn mainly on the basis of race. In Rucho v. Common Cause (2019), it ruled that federal courts can't decide claims of partisan gerrymandering, leaving the issue to states and Congress.
Effects at different scales
- Local: city council and school board districts decide which neighborhoods get a representative who reflects their interests.
- State: maps for the state legislature can lock in one party's control even when statewide votes are close.
- National: the combined district maps of all the states help decide which party controls the U.S. House.
- Other democracies, like the United Kingdom and Canada, use independent commissions to draw boundaries.
Worked examples
Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.
- Example 1
Packing and cracking with numbers
A state has 50 voters: 30 support Party A and 20 support Party B. It must draw 5 districts of 10 voters each. Show how lines could be drawn to give Party A all 5 seats, and how they could be drawn to give Party B a majority of seats.
Show the solutionHide the solution
- Step 1: Favor Party A by cracking B: put 6 A voters and 4 B voters in each district. A wins all 5 districts, 6–4. Check: 5 × 6 = 30 A voters and 5 × 4 = 20 B voters.
- Step 2: Favor Party B by packing A: put 10 A voters in each of 2 districts (20 A voters used). Split the remaining 10 A voters and 20 B voters across 3 districts as 4–6, 3–7 and 3–7. B wins those 3 districts.
- Step 3: Check the second map: A voters total 10 + 10 + 4 + 3 + 3 = 30, and B voters total 6 + 7 + 7 = 20.
- Step 4: Compare: with 60% of the votes, Party A could win 5 seats or only 2, depending only on where the lines go.
Answer: Cracking B (6 A and 4 B per district) gives A all 5 seats. Packing A into 2 districts gives B 3 of 5 seats with only 40% of the votes. District lines alone can flip the result.
Common mistakes
- Confusing reapportionment with redistricting. Reapportionment divides seats among states; redistricting draws lines within a state.
- Reversing packing and cracking. Packing concentrates voters; cracking spreads them out.
- Writing about gerrymandering as a one-party practice. Keep the explanation nonpartisan.
On the exam
- Questions often show a district map and ask you to identify packing or cracking, or to explain how redistricting affects representation.
- Name the scale when you explain an effect: local, state or national.
Connected topics
Videos
Check yourself
4 questions on 4.6 Internal Boundaries. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
| District | Plan X: Party A vote share (%) | Plan Y: Party A vote share (%) | Plan Z: Party A vote share (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| District 1 | 80 | 56 | 95 |
| District 2 | 75 | 56 | 95 |
| District 3 | 65 | 56 | 45 |
| District 4 | 45 | 56 | 45 |
| District 5 | 35 | 76 | 20 |
Hypothetical state with five districts of equal population; Party A wins 60 percent of the statewide vote under every plan
Which plan packs Party A's voters into a few districts, so that Party A wins fewer seats than its statewide share would suggest?
Plan Y gives Party A all five seats. Which method does Plan Y use?
Which plan gives a seat result closest to Party A's share of the statewide vote?
After a U.S. census shows that a state has gained population faster than most others, which sequence of events is most likely?
0 of 4 answered