Skip to main content

Unit 9 · Topic 9.1

9.1 Contextualizing Cold War and Contemporary Europe

World War II ended Europe's long domination of the world. The continent lay in ruins, the United States and the Soviet Union emerged as the two superpowers with opposite systems, and Europe's colonial empires began to break up. Almost everything in Unit 9 grows out of these three facts.

Key terms

  • superpower
  • capitalism
  • communism
  • Iron Curtain
  • decolonization

Europe in 1945

In 1945 much of Europe was rubble. Cities such as Warsaw, Berlin, Dresden and Rotterdam had been bombed or fought over, bridges and railways were wrecked, and food and fuel were scarce. Tens of millions of Europeans had been killed, and millions more were refugees or displaced persons: survivors of the camps, former forced laborers, prisoners of war and people fleeing the Red Army.

Borders and populations shifted again. Poland was moved west, losing land to the Soviet Union and gaining German land up to the Oder and Neisse rivers. Roughly 12 million Germans fled or were expelled from Poland, Czechoslovakia and other parts of eastern Europe. Germany itself was divided into four occupation zones run by the United States, Britain, France and the Soviet Union, and Berlin, deep inside the Soviet zone, was split the same way.

Two superpowers

A superpower is a state with enough military, economic and political strength to act everywhere in the world. After 1945 only two qualified. The United States had suffered no fighting on its mainland, produced about half the world's manufactured goods right after the war, and alone had the atomic bomb until 1949. The Soviet Union had lost about 27 million people but had the largest army in Europe, and its troops occupied the eastern half of the continent.

Their systems were opposites. The United States stood for capitalism, an economy based on private ownership and markets, and for multiparty democracy. The Soviet Union stood for communism, an economy owned and planned by the state, under the rule of one party. Each side believed its system should spread and saw the other as a threat.

FeatureUnited States and Western alliesSoviet Union and its satellites
EconomyMostly market-based, private propertyState-owned, centrally planned
PoliticsCompeting parties, free electionsOne-party rule by the Communist Party
RightsFree press and speech, with limitsCensorship and secret police
AllianceNATO (1949)Warsaw Pact (1955)

From allies to rivals

The wartime alliance had been a marriage of convenience. At the Yalta Conference (February 1945) and the Potsdam Conference (July–August 1945), the Allies agreed to divide Germany and promised free elections in liberated eastern Europe. Stalin, who wanted friendly governments on the Soviet Union's western border after two German invasions, instead helped communists take control in Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria and, by 1948, Czechoslovakia. In 1946 Winston Churchill warned that an “Iron Curtain” had come down across the continent. By the late 1940s Europe was split between a U.S.-backed West and a Soviet-controlled East (9.3, 9.4).

Europe's shrinking place in the world

The war also broke the European empires. Britain and France were exhausted and deeply in debt, Japan's wartime conquests had shown that European colonial rulers could be defeated, and colonized peoples who had fought for the Allies demanded the freedom the Allies claimed to defend. Within about 20 years most of Asia and Africa was independent (9.9).

Western Europeans responded to their weakness partly by working together. Recovery aid from the United States (9.2) and the first steps toward European integration (9.10) both started in this postwar moment. So, in a sense, did the welfare state (9.6), as governments promised citizens who had sacrificed in the war a fairer, more secure life.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Contextualizing a Cold War source

    A source is Winston Churchill's 1946 speech warning that an “Iron Curtain” had descended across Europe. Describe ONE historical development that provides context for the speech.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Look for a development just before 1946 that explains why Churchill would say this.
    2. Step 2: Choose the Soviet occupation of eastern Europe at the end of World War II, and the communist-dominated governments forming there.
    3. Step 3: Connect it to the speech: Churchill saw the division as a lasting threat to freedom in Europe.

    Answer: At the end of World War II the Red Army occupied eastern Europe, and despite promises of free elections made at Yalta in 1945, the Soviet Union backed communist-dominated governments in countries such as Poland, Romania and Bulgaria. Churchill's speech reflects Western alarm that this Soviet control was hardening into a permanent division of Europe.

Common mistakes

  • Saying Germany was divided into two zones in 1945. It was divided into four occupation zones; the two German states were created in 1949.
  • Treating the superpower rivalry as only military. It was also a contest of economic systems and ideologies.
  • Forgetting decolonization. The end of European empires is one of the three big postwar developments, alongside ruin and the Cold War.

On the exam

  • Contextualization for any post-1945 essay can start here: Europe's devastation, the superpower rivalry and the end of empire.
  • If a source is from the late 1940s, ask whether it reflects recovery, Cold War division or decolonization, and say which.

Connected topics

Videos

  • Context for the COLD WAR & DECOLONIZATION [AP World History Review—Unit 8 Topic 1]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • USA vs USSR Fight! The Cold War: Crash Course World History #39

    CrashCourseWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Origins of the Cold War

    Khan AcademyWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • World War 2 Allied Conferences: AP European History

    AP Euro Bit by Bit with Paul SargentWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 9.1 Contextualizing Cold War and Contemporary Europe. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

At the present moment in world history nearly every nation must choose between alternative ways of life. The choice is too often not a free one.

One way of life is based upon the will of the majority, and is distinguished by free institutions, representative government, free elections, guarantees of individual liberty, freedom of speech and religion, and freedom from political oppression.

The second way of life is based upon the will of a minority forcibly imposed upon the majority. It relies upon terror and oppression, a controlled press and radio; fixed elections, and the suppression of personal freedoms.

I believe that it must be the policy of the United States to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures.

Source: President Harry S. Truman, address to Congress requesting aid for Greece and Turkey, March 12, 1947.

Question 1 of 4

Truman's speech is best understood in the context of

Britain's withdrawal from India in 1947 came through negotiation. Weakened by the Second World War and facing a mass independence movement led by the Indian National Congress, the British government agreed to transfer power. But the subcontinent was partitioned into India and Pakistan, and violence between Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs during the division killed an estimated several hundred thousand to one million people and drove some ten to fifteen million from their homes.

In Algeria, which France treated as part of France itself and where about a million European settlers lived, independence came only after a brutal war from 1954 to 1962. The National Liberation Front (FLN) fought a guerrilla campaign, French forces used torture and mass detentions, and the conflict brought down France's Fourth Republic before President Charles de Gaulle accepted Algerian independence.

Passage written for this practice set.

Question 2 of 4

The passage suggests that World War II contributed to decolonization mainly by

At bottom of Kremlin's neurotic view of world affairs is traditional and instinctive Russian sense of insecurity. . . .

Soviet power, unlike that of Hitlerite Germany, is neither schematic nor adventuristic. It does not work by fixed plans. It does not take unnecessary risks. Impervious to logic of reason, and it is highly sensitive to logic of force. For this reason it can easily withdraw—and usually does when strong resistance is encountered at any point.

Source: George F. Kennan, American diplomat at the U.S. embassy in Moscow, telegram to the State Department (the "Long Telegram"), February 22, 1946. Kennan wrote in a clipped telegram style that often leaves out words like "the."

Question 3 of 4

Kennan's first statement suggests that Soviet foreign policy after 1945 was shaped in part by

Question 4 of 4

Kennan's contrast between Soviet power and "Hitlerite Germany" suggests that he believed

0 of 4 answered