Skip to main content

Unit 7 · Topic 7.2

7.2 Nationalism

Nationalism, the belief that a people sharing a language, culture and history should have its own state, was the most powerful political idea of the 1800s. It began as a liberal and romantic movement, but by 1900 governments used it to win loyalty, multi-ethnic empires struggled against it, and a new racial nationalism fed anti-Semitism, which in turn helped spark Zionism.

Key terms

  • Giuseppe Mazzini
  • Dual Monarchy (Austria-Hungary)
  • anti-Semitism
  • Dreyfus affair
  • Zionism
  • Theodor Herzl

See it on a map: 1871: Germany and Italy unified

Many kinds of nationalism

Early 19th-century nationalism drew on Romanticism's love of folk culture. The German writer Johann Gottfried Herder had argued that each people has its own spirit expressed in its language and songs, and the Brothers Grimm collected German folk tales partly for that reason. Johann Gottlieb Fichte's Addresses to the German Nation (1807–1808), delivered under Napoleon's occupation, called on Germans to see themselves as one people with a special mission. Liberal nationalists linked national freedom to constitutions and rights. The Italian Giuseppe Mazzini founded Young Italy (1831) to create a united, democratic Italian republic, and believed free nations would live together in peace.

After 1850 nationalism became more conservative and more aggressive. Conservative statesmen such as Napoleon III, Cavour and Bismarck learned to harness popular national feeling to build new states or make existing ones stronger. Chauvinism, a boastful belief in one's own nation's superiority, was used to justify expansion at other nations' expense. Some nationalists began to define the nation by race and blood instead of shared culture or citizenship, and to see other nations as enemies in a struggle for survival, an idea strengthened by Social Darwinism (7.4).

How nationalism spread

Several forces turned ordinary people into conscious members of a nation. Public schools taught a standard national language and patriotic history. Conscription put young men from different regions into the same army. Railroads and cheap newspapers connected regions. National holidays, anthems, flags and monuments gave people shared symbols. By 1900, many peasants who had once identified mainly with their village thought of themselves as French, German or Italian.

Napoleon III and Austria-Hungary

Louis-Napoleon Bonaparte, nephew of Napoleon I, was elected president of France in 1848, seized power in 1851 and became Emperor Napoleon III in 1852. He combined authoritarian rule with universal male suffrage and plebiscites, rebuilt Paris (6.9), promoted railways and banks, and pursued national glory abroad in the Crimea, Italy and Mexico. His regime collapsed after defeat by Prussia in 1870.

The Austrian Empire faced the opposite problem: nationalism threatened to break it apart. After losing to Prussia in 1866, Emperor Franz Joseph made the Compromise of 1867 (Ausgleich) with the Hungarians. It created the Dual Monarchy of Austria-Hungary: two states with separate parliaments and governments, sharing one monarch, one army, foreign policy and the finances for those. Germans dominated the Austrian half and Magyars (Hungarians) the Hungarian half, but Czechs, Slovaks, Poles, Croats, Serbs, Romanians and others still lacked equal power. Their frustration, and Serbia's appeal to South Slavs, became a direct cause of World War I.

In the Ottoman lands and Russia, Pan-Slavism, the idea that Slavic peoples should unite under Russian leadership, encouraged Balkan nationalism, while Russia's own Russification policy forced the Russian language and Orthodox religion on Poles, Finns and others.

Anti-Semitism and the Dreyfus affair

Jews in western Europe had won legal equality in the 1800s, and many joined the professions. Older religious hostility now mixed with new racial theories, and politicians found that blaming Jews for economic troubles won votes. In Berlin, the court preacher Adolf Stoecker's Christian Social Party (founded 1878) mixed social reform with attacks on Jews, and in Vienna, Karl Lueger, leader of Austria's Christian Social Party, became mayor in 1897 after campaigns that used anti-Semitic appeals. In Russia, waves of violent attacks called pogroms followed the assassination of Alexander II in 1881, pushing many Jews to emigrate.

In France, Captain Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish army officer, was convicted of spying for Germany in 1894 and sent to Devil's Island. Evidence soon pointed to another officer, Major Esterhazy, but the army covered it up. The novelist Émile Zola's open letter “J'accuse…!” (1898) accused the army of injustice. The affair split France between the army, Church and nationalist right on one side and republicans and the left on the other. Dreyfus was pardoned in 1899 and fully cleared in 1906, and the bitterness helped lead to the 1905 law separating church and state.

Zionism

Theodor Herzl, a Jewish journalist from Vienna who covered the Dreyfus affair, concluded that assimilation would not protect Jews from anti-Semitism. In The Jewish State (1896) he argued that Jews needed a homeland of their own, and in 1897 he organized the First Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland. Zionism was itself a form of nationalism, a response to exclusion by other nationalisms. It later shaped the history of Palestine and the founding of Israel in 1948.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Explaining how nationalism changed

    Explain ONE way European nationalism changed between the 1830s and the 1890s.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Describe the earlier form with evidence: Mazzini's liberal nationalism linked national unity to democracy and cooperation among nations.
    2. Step 2: Describe the later form with evidence: nationalism used by governments and tied to race, seen in anti-Semitism and the Dreyfus affair.
    3. Step 3: Explain the reason for the change: failure of 1848, unification by conservative states, Social Darwinism.

    Answer: In the 1830s, nationalists like Giuseppe Mazzini tied nationalism to liberal goals, imagining free, democratic nations living side by side. By the 1890s nationalism had become more exclusive and aggressive: after conservative states like Prussia unified nations through war, many nationalists defined the nation by race, and anti-Semitic nationalism fueled the Dreyfus affair in France and Karl Lueger's rise to mayor of Vienna.

Common mistakes

  • Treating Austria-Hungary as two separate empires. The Dual Monarchy shared one monarch, army and foreign policy while each half ran its own internal affairs.
  • Saying Dreyfus was cleared quickly. He was convicted in 1894, pardoned in 1899 and only fully exonerated in 1906.
  • Forgetting that nationalism could divide states as well as unite them.

On the exam

  • Expect sources that show nationalism's different forms. Identify whether the source is liberal, conservative or racial nationalism and explain why.
  • Austria-Hungary's nationalities problem is strong evidence for long-term causes of World War I.

Connected topics

Videos

  • NATIONALISM, Explained [AP Euro Review—Unit 7 Topic 2]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • What is Nationalism & Why Does it Matter?

    OER ProjectWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The Dreyfus Affair: Explained (Short Animated Documentary)

    History MattersWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Theodor Herzl and the birth of political Zionism | The 20th century | World history | Khan Academy

    Khan AcademyWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Ten Minute History - The Austro-Hungarian Empire (Short Documentary)

    History MattersWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 7.2 Nationalism. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

We are a people—One people.

We have honestly endeavored everywhere to merge ourselves in the social life of surrounding communities, and to preserve only the faith of our fathers. It has not been permitted to us. In vain are we loyal patriots, our loyalty in some places running to extremes; in vain do we make the same sacrifices of life and property as our fellow citizens; in vain do we strive to increase the fame of our native land in science and art, or her wealth by trade and commerce. In countries where we have lived for centuries we are still cried down as strangers . . . . If we could only be left in peace. . . .

But I think we shall not be left in peace.

Source: Theodor Herzl, Austro-Hungarian Jewish journalist, The Jewish State, 1896. Translated by Sylvie d'Avigdor, as revised by Jacob de Haas (New York: Federation of American Zionists, 1917).

Question 1 of 4

Herzl's pessimism about Jews being "left in peace" was most directly shaped by

Question 2 of 4

Herzl's statement that Jews are "a people—One people" shows that Zionism was

Question 3 of 4

The Compromise of 1867, which created the Dual Monarchy of Austria-Hungary, was mainly an attempt to

Question 4 of 4

The Dreyfus affair (1894–1906) divided French society mainly between

0 of 4 answered