Skip to main content

Unit 6 · Topic 6.5

6.5 The Concert of Europe and European Conservatism

After Napoleon's defeat, the great powers cooperated in the Concert of Europe to keep the peace and keep revolution down. Led by Austria's Prince Metternich, conservatives defended monarchy, aristocracy and established churches against liberalism and nationalism, the two ideas the French Revolution had spread.

Key terms

  • Concert of Europe
  • conservatism
  • Metternich
  • Carlsbad Decrees
  • Holy Alliance

See it on a map: 1815: The Congress of Vienna

What conservatives believed

Conservatism as a political ideology grew directly out of reaction to the French Revolution. Edmund Burke, a British politician, argued in Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790) that societies are like living things built up slowly over generations. Tearing down institutions in the name of abstract reason, as the revolutionaries did, would lead to chaos and tyranny. Change should be gradual and respect tradition.

Joseph de Maistre, a writer from Savoy, went further. He defended absolute monarchy and the authority of the pope, arguing that order rested on throne and altar, and that human reason alone could not hold society together.

Underneath both views was a belief that human nature is flawed and cannot be perfected, so people need the restraint of tradition, religion and authority. In short, conservatives valued hereditary monarchy, a social order led by landed nobles, an established church, and stability over individual rights. Restored governments after 1815 often strengthened the churches' role in education and public life.

The Concert of Europe

The Congress of Vienna (1814–1815) redrew the map after Napoleon (5.7). To protect that settlement, Britain, Austria, Prussia and Russia renewed their alliance as the Quadruple Alliance in November 1815, and in 1818 France was welcomed back into the circle of great powers. The powers agreed to meet regularly in congresses to settle problems together. This system of great-power cooperation is called the Concert of Europe.

Separate from that, Tsar Alexander I proposed the Holy Alliance (September 1815), in which Russia, Austria and Prussia pledged to rule by Christian principles. It became shorthand for the three eastern monarchies' commitment to crushing revolution. Britain refused to join.

CongressYearOutcome
Aix-la-Chapelle1818France readmitted as a great power; allied troops leave France
Troppau1820Austria, Prussia and Russia claim the right to intervene against revolutions
Laibach1821Austria authorized to crush revolutions in Naples and Piedmont
Verona1822France authorized to invade Spain and restore King Ferdinand VII (1823)

Metternich's system

Klemens von Metternich, Austria's foreign minister from 1809 and chancellor until 1848, saw liberalism and nationalism as deadly threats. His reason was practical: the Austrian Empire contained Germans, Hungarians, Czechs, Poles, Italians, Croats and others, so the idea that each nation should govern itself could tear it apart.

In 1819 a nationalist student, Karl Sand, murdered the conservative writer August von Kotzebue. Metternich used the crime to push the Carlsbad Decrees through the German Confederation. They censored newspapers and books, placed inspectors in universities, dismissed liberal professors and dissolved the student nationalist societies called Burschenschaften.

Conservatism beyond Austria

  • Britain: the Corn Laws (1815) kept grain prices high to protect landowners; in 1819 cavalry charged a peaceful reform rally in Manchester, killing about 15 to 18 people (the Peterloo Massacre), and Parliament passed the repressive Six Acts.
  • France: the restored Bourbon kings ruled under a limited charter, but Charles X (1824–1830) tried to restore older royal and church power, which led to the 1830 revolution (6.6).
  • Russia: Nicholas I (1825–1855) crushed the Decembrists, ruled by the motto “Orthodoxy, Autocracy, Nationality,” put down a Polish uprising in 1830–1831 and helped Austria defeat the Hungarians in 1849.

Successes and cracks

The Concert's great success: there was no war among the great powers from 1815 until the Crimean War of 1853. Its weakness: the powers disagreed about intervention. Britain, under foreign secretaries Castlereagh and then Canning, refused to police revolutions in other countries and helped block any attempt to restore Spain's rebellious American colonies. Revolutions in Greece and Belgium in the 1820s and 1830s were accepted when they suited the powers' interests, and the revolutions of 1848 swept Metternich himself from power. The Crimean War (7.1) finished off the cooperative system.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    Sourcing a conservative document

    A source is an 1819 circular from Metternich warning German princes that university students and professors are spreading revolutionary ideas. Explain how Metternich's position might have shaped the document's argument.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Identify the author's position: chief minister of the multi-ethnic Austrian Empire and leading voice of the Concert of Europe.
    2. Step 2: Explain his interest: nationalism and liberalism threatened both Austria's unity and the Vienna settlement.
    3. Step 3: Connect position to argument: he would exaggerate the danger of students to justify censorship, which he got in the Carlsbad Decrees that year.

    Answer: As chief minister of an empire made up of many nationalities, Metternich had a strong interest in portraying nationalist students as a dangerous revolutionary conspiracy. Liberal and nationalist ideas threatened both Austria's unity and the order set up at Vienna, so his circular was meant to persuade German rulers to accept the censorship and university controls of the Carlsbad Decrees (1819).

Common mistakes

  • Treating the Holy Alliance and the Concert of Europe as the same thing. The Holy Alliance was Russia, Austria and Prussia's religious pledge; the Concert was the broader system of great-power congresses, including Britain and later France.
  • Calling Burke a supporter of absolute monarchy. He defended Britain's balanced, gradual constitution and opposed sudden revolutionary change; de Maistre was the defender of absolutism.
  • Forgetting that Britain pulled away from the Concert's interventions after 1820.

On the exam

  • Questions often ask you to explain conservative responses to the French Revolution. Name a thinker (Burke or de Maistre) and a policy (Carlsbad Decrees, Troppau Protocol).
  • This topic pairs naturally with 5.7 (Congress of Vienna) for continuity-and-change arguments about the balance of power.

Connected topics

Videos

  • The CONCERT of EUROPE & European Conservatism [AP Euro Review—Unit 6 Topic 5]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Reform and Revolution 1815-1848: Crash Course European History #25

    CrashCourseWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Age of Ideologies Overview: AP Euro Bit by Bit #31

    AP Euro Bit by Bit with Paul SargentWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • World War I: The Seminal Tragedy - The Concert of Europe - Extra History - Part 1

    Extra HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The Congress of Vienna: Metternich's Conservative Order (AP Euro)

    Tom RicheyWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

5 questions on 6.5 The Concert of Europe and European Conservatism. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

This evil may be described in one word—presumption; the natural effect of the rapid progression of the human mind towards the perfecting of so many things. . . . Religion, morality, legislation, economy, politics, administration, all have become common and accessible to everyone. Knowledge seems to come by inspiration; experience has no value for the presumptuous man; faith is nothing to him . . . . Laws have no value for him, because he has not contributed to make them, and it would be beneath a man of his parts to recognise the limits traced by rude and ignorant generations. . . .

Presumption makes every man the guide of his own belief, the arbiter of laws according to which he is pleased to govern himself . . . .

Source: Klemens von Metternich, Austrian foreign minister, "Political Confession of Faith," a private memorandum sent to Tsar Alexander I of Russia, 1820. From Memoirs of Prince Metternich, translated by Mrs. Alexander Napier, 1881.

Question 1 of 5

Metternich's criticism of "presumption" is aimed most directly at

Question 2 of 5

Ideas like those in the passage were put into practice most directly through

A state without the means of some change is without the means of its conservation. . . .

Society is indeed a contract. Subordinate contracts for objects of mere occasional interest may be dissolved at pleasure—but the state ought not to be considered as nothing better than a partnership agreement in a trade of pepper and coffee, calico or tobacco, or some other such low concern, to be taken up for a little temporary interest, and to be dissolved by the fancy of the parties. . . . As the ends of such a partnership cannot be obtained in many generations, it becomes a partnership not only between those who are living, but between those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born.

Source: Edmund Burke, Irish-born member of the British Parliament, Reflections on the Revolution in France, 1790.

Question 3 of 5

Burke's description of society as a partnership among "those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born" is most consistent with which belief?

Question 4 of 5

Burke's statement that a state "without the means of some change" cannot preserve itself suggests that his conservatism

Question 5 of 5

After 1815, ideas like Burke's were most closely reflected in

0 of 5 answered