Skip to main content

Unit 4 · Topic 4.7

4.7 Causation in the Age of the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment

This wrap-up topic practices causation across Unit 4. You'll explain how the Scientific Revolution led thinkers to seek natural laws for society, how Enlightenment ideas fed reform and later revolution, and how to separate long-term causes from immediate triggers.

Key terms

  • causation
  • natural law
  • reason
  • skepticism
  • long-term vs. short-term causes

The big causal chain

  • Long-term causes: the Renaissance, printing, exploration and the Reformation weakened trust in ancient and Church authority.
  • The Scientific Revolution showed that observation, experiment and math could explain nature with simple laws, from Copernicus in 1543 to Newton in 1687.
  • Enlightenment thinkers applied those methods to people and governments, arguing for natural rights, toleration, separation of powers and free markets.
  • Print culture, salons and coffeehouses spread these ideas to a growing reading public.
  • Effects: reforms by enlightened absolutists, new public opinion, and ideas that later inspired revolutions in America and France.

A chain you can use

StepExampleLink to the next step
New method in scienceBacon's call for experiments, Newton's laws (1687)Showed reason could find natural laws
Applied to societyLocke's natural rights, Montesquieu's separation of powersGave critics a standard to judge governments
Spread to a publicEncyclopédie, salons, coffeehousesCreated public opinion rulers had to answer to
Political effectsEnlightened absolutist reforms; later revolutionsChanged laws and, after 1789, regimes

Long-term causes versus triggers

A long-term cause builds up conditions over decades. A trigger, or proximate cause, is the immediate event that sets something off. For example, Enlightenment ideas about consent of the governed were a long-term cause of the French Revolution. France's bankruptcy and the calling of the Estates-General in 1789 were the triggers (see 5.4). Strong essays say which is which and how they combined.

Effects you can argue

Some effects were reforms within the existing order: Frederick the Great's toleration and legal reform, Joseph II's Patent of Toleration, and Beccaria's influence on ending torture. Others were challenges to the order: Locke's right of revolution and Rousseau's general will gave language to revolutionaries.

There were limits and unintended effects too. Enlightenment thinkers rarely included women, the poor or enslaved people in their ideas of rights. Yet critics like Mary Wollstonecraft and, later, enslaved revolutionaries in Haiti turned the language of universal rights against those exclusions (see 5.5). That's a good example of an unintended consequence.

Continuity worth noting

Not everything changed. Most Europeans remained religious, absolute monarchy remained the most common form of government, and serfdom persisted in the east. Folk beliefs, astrology and alchemy survived. Showing these continuities next to the changes demonstrates complexity.

Using sources for causation

Short-answer and document questions often hand you one piece of the chain, such as a passage from a philosophe or an image of a salon. Ask what came before it that made it possible and what it led to. A salon painting, for example, shows how ideas spread, so you can link it backward to the rise of print and literacy and forward to public pressure on governments.

Worked examples

Try each one yourself first, then open the solution.

  1. Example 1

    A causation body paragraph

    Long-essay practice: Write a body paragraph explaining how the Scientific Revolution contributed to the Enlightenment.

    Show the solution
    1. Step 1: Claim linking the two movements.
    2. Step 2: Evidence from both: a scientist and a philosophe.
    3. Step 3: Reasoning: explain the mechanism of influence.
    4. Step 4: Complexity: add a qualification.

    Answer: Model paragraph: The Scientific Revolution gave Enlightenment thinkers both a method and confidence. Newton's Principia (1687) showed that a few mathematical laws governed the whole universe, and philosophes reasoned that society, too, must have natural laws discoverable by reason. Locke argued that natural rights to life, liberty and property came before any government, and Montesquieu compared governments to identify principles like the separation of powers. Science did not cause the Enlightenment alone, however; political conflicts such as England's Glorious Revolution gave thinkers like Locke concrete problems to solve.

Common mistakes

  • Treating the Enlightenment as the cause of the French Revolution all by itself. Debt, hunger and the political crisis of 1788–1789 were essential triggers.
  • Listing thinkers without showing effects. Tie each idea to a reform, policy or event.
  • Ignoring who was left out. Mentioning the limits of Enlightenment rights shows sophistication.

On the exam

  • Causation is a frequent long-essay reasoning type. Practice turning a list of causes into a chain with clear links.
  • The difference between long-term causes and triggers is a reliable way to earn complexity.

Connected topics

Videos

  • The Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment Compared

    Tom RicheyWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The ENLIGHTENMENT, Explained [AP World History Review—Unit 5 Topic 1]

    Heimler's HistoryWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • The Scientific Revolution: Crash Course History of Science #12

    CrashCourseWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

  • Newton and Locke: Foundations of the Enlightenment (The Philosophes: Thinkers of the Enlightenment)

    Tom RicheyWatch on YouTube (opens in a new tab)

Check yourself

4 questions on 4.7 Causation in the Age of the Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment. Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.

Question 1 of 4

Which of the following best describes how the Scientific Revolution influenced the Enlightenment?

Question 2 of 4

Which of the following best explains why Enlightenment books were often printed in the Dutch Republic and Britain?

The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions . . . .

[W]henever the legislators endeavour to take away, and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any farther obedience . . . . [B]y this breach of trust they forfeit the power the people had put into their hands for quite contrary ends, and it devolves to the people, who have a right to resume their original liberty, and, by the establishment of a new legislative, (such as they shall think fit) provide for their own safety and security . . . .

Source: John Locke, English philosopher, Second Treatise of Government, 1689.

Question 3 of 4

Locke's ideas were most directly used to justify which later development?

Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains. One thinks himself the master of others, and still remains a greater slave than they. How did this change come about? I do not know. What can make it legitimate? That question I think I can answer. . . .

"Each of us puts his person and all his power in common under the supreme direction of the general will, and, in our corporate capacity, we receive each member as an indivisible part of the whole." . . .

[W]hoever refuses to obey the general will shall be compelled to do so by the whole body. This means nothing less than that he will be forced to be free . . . .

Source: Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Geneva-born writer, The Social Contract, 1762. Translated by G. D. H. Cole, 1913.

Question 4 of 4

Critics have argued that Rousseau's idea that a person may be "forced to be free" could be used to

0 of 4 answered