Skip to main content

Document-based question (DBQ)

The Reformation and the power of rulers

  • Unit 2
  • 7 points
  • About 60 minutes

You write an argument essay that answers a question using seven documents plus history you know. Points come from your thesis, context, use of the documents and outside evidence, sourcing and complex understanding. On the exam: 1 required question (Section II, Question 1), 60 minutes recommended including a 15-minute reading period, 25% of the score. Seven documents; the topic falls between 1450 and 2001.

The question and its sources

Suggested time: 60 minutes, including 15 minutes to read the documents. The documents have been edited for this exercise.

Document 1

I say then, since the temporal power is ordained of God to punish evil-doers and to protect them that do well, it should therefore be left free to perform its office without hindrance through the whole body of Christendom without respect of persons, whether it affect pope, bishops, priests, monks, nuns or anybody else. . . .

Now, in this matter the German nation, bishops and princes, should consider that they too are Christians, and should protect the people, whom they are set to rule and guard in things temporal and spiritual, against these ravening wolves who, in sheep's clothing, pretend to be shepherds and rulers; and, since the annates* are so shamefully abused . . . they should not permit their land and people to be so sadly robbed and ruined, against all justice; but by a law of the emperor or of the whole nation, they should either keep the annates at home or else abolish them again.

*annates: a payment to the pope of the first year's income from a church office

Source: Martin Luther, German monk and theologian, An Open Letter to the Christian Nobility of the German Nation, 1520. Trans. C. M. Jacobs, in Works of Martin Luther, vol. 2 (Philadelphia: A. J. Holman, 1915).

Document 2

First, it is our humble petition and desire, as also our will and desire, that in the future we should have power and authority so that each community should choose and appoint a pastor, and that we should have the right to depose him should he conduct himself improperly. The pastor thus chosen should teach us the gospel pure and simple, without any addition, doctrine, or ordinance of man. . . .

It has been the custom hitherto for men to hold us as their own property, which is pitiable enough, considering that Christ has delivered and redeemed us all, without exception, by the shedding of his precious blood, the lowly as well as the great. Accordingly it is consistent with Scripture that we should be free and should wish to be so. Not that we would wish to be absolutely free and under no authority. . . . We therefore take it for granted that you will release us from serfdom as true Christians, unless it should be shown from the gospel that we are serfs.

Source: The Twelve Articles, demands of the peasants of Upper Swabia (southern Germany), drafted by Sebastian Lotzer, a journeyman furrier and lay preacher, Memmingen, 1525. Trans. in James Harvey Robinson, ed., Readings in European History, vol. 2 (Boston: Ginn, 1906), pp. 94–99.

Document 3

Albeit the king's majesty justly and rightfully is and ought to be the supreme head of the church of England, and so is recognized by the clergy of this realm in their convocations, yet nevertheless, for corroboration and confirmation thereof, and for increase of virtue in Christ's religion within this realm of England, and to repress and extirp all errors, heresies, and other enormities and abuses heretofore used in the same: be it enacted by authority of this present parliament, that the king our sovereign lord, his heirs and successors, kings of this realm, shall be taken, accepted, and reputed the only supreme head in earth of the church of England . . . and that our said sovereign lord, his heirs and successors . . . shall have full power and authority from time to time to visit, repress, redress, reform, order, correct, restrain, and amend all such errors, heresies, abuses, offences, contempts, and enormities . . . any usage, custom, foreign law, foreign authority, prescription, or any other thing or things to the contrary hereof notwithstanding.

Source: Act of Supremacy, passed by the English Parliament under King Henry VIII, November 1534. Text from Henry Gee and William John Hardy, eds., Documents Illustrative of English Church History (London: Macmillan, 1896), pp. 243–244.

Document 4

But I return to you, Sire. Let not your Majesty be at all moved by those groundless accusations with which our adversaries endeavour to terrify you; as that the sole tendency and design of this new Gospel—for so they call it—is to furnish a pretext for seditions, and to gain impunity for all crimes. . . . Is it probable that we are meditating the subversion of kingdoms?—we, who were never heard to utter a factious word, whose lives were ever known to be peaceable and honest while we lived under your government, and who, even now in our exile, cease not to pray for all prosperity to attend yourself and your kingdom! . . .

But if the Gospel be made a pretext for tumults, which has not yet happened in your kingdom; if any persons make the liberty of divine grace an excuse for the licentiousness of their vices, of whom I have known many,—there are laws and legal penalties, by which they may be punished according to their deserts; only let not the Gospel of God be reproached for the crimes of wicked men.

Source: John Calvin, French Protestant reformer living in exile, dedication of the Institutes of the Christian Religion to King Francis I of France, 1536. Trans. John Allen, in Charles W. Eliot, ed., Prefaces and Prologues to Famous Books, Harvard Classics vol. 39 (New York: P. F. Collier & Son, 1910).

Document 5

First Rule. The first: All judgment laid aside, we ought to have our mind ready and prompt to obey, in all, the true Spouse of Christ our Lord, which is our holy Mother the Church Hierarchical. . . .

Ninth Rule. Finally, to praise all precepts of the Church, keeping the mind prompt to find reasons in their defence and in no manner against them. . . .

Thirteenth Rule. To be right in everything, we ought always to hold that the white which I see, is black, if the Hierarchical Church so decides it.

Source: Ignatius of Loyola, Spanish founder of the Society of Jesus (the Jesuits), rules for thinking with the Church from the Spiritual Exercises, a guide approved by Pope Paul III in 1548. Trans. Elder Mullan, S.J., The Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius of Loyola (New York: P. J. Kenedy & Sons, 1914).

Document 6

So it was determined to exterminate all the Protestants and the plan was approved by the queen [Catherine de' Medici, mother of King Charles IX]. They discussed for some time whether they should make an exception of the king of Navarre and the prince of Condé. All agreed that the king of Navarre should be spared by reason of the royal dignity and the new alliance. The duke of Guise, who was put in full command of the enterprise, summoned by night several captains of the Catholic Swiss mercenaries . . . and some commanders of French companies, and told them that it was the will of the king that, according to God's will, they should take vengeance on the band of rebels while they had the beasts in the toils. . . .

[After the Protestant leader Admiral Coligny was killed, one of the Catholic leaders said:] "Cheer up, my friends! Let us do thoroughly that which we have begun. The king commands it." He frequently repeated these words, and as soon as they had caused the bell of the palace clock to ring, on every side arose the cry, "To arms!" and the people ran to the house of Coligny.

Source: Jacques-Auguste de Thou, French Catholic magistrate and historian who witnessed the events in Paris as a young man, account of the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre of August 24, 1572, from his history of his own times, written in the early 1600s. Trans. in James Harvey Robinson, ed., Readings in European History, vol. 2 (Boston: Ginn, 1906), pp. 180–183.

Document 7

My loving people, we have been persuaded by some, that are careful of our safety, to take heed how we commit ourselves to armed multitudes, for fear of treachery; but I assure you, I do not desire to live to distrust my faithful and loving people. Let tyrants fear; I have always so behaved myself that, under God, I have placed my chiefest strength and safeguard in the loyal hearts and good will of my subjects. . . .

I know I have but the body of a weak and feeble woman; but I have the heart of a king, and of a king of England, too; and think foul scorn that Parma or Spain, or any prince of Europe, should dare to invade the borders of my realms. . . . We shall shortly have a famous victory over the enemies of my God, of my kingdom, and of my people.

Source: Queen Elizabeth I of England, speech to troops gathered at Tilbury to defend against the Spanish Armada, August 1588, as reported by Leonel Sharp, a clergyman who was present, in a letter written decades later to the Duke of Buckingham. First printed in Cabala, Mysteries of State (London, 1654), pp. 372–374. Spelling modernized.

Suggested time: 60 minutes

Your answers are saved in this browser as you type.

The essay

7 points

Evaluate the extent to which the Protestant and Catholic Reformations strengthened the authority of secular rulers in Europe in the period 1517 to 1600. In your response you should do the following: • Respond to the prompt with a historically defensible thesis or claim that establishes a line of reasoning. • Describe a broader historical context relevant to the prompt. • Support an argument in response to the prompt using at least four documents. • Use at least one additional piece of specific historical evidence (beyond that found in the documents) relevant to an argument about the prompt. • For at least two documents, explain how or why the document's point of view, purpose, historical situation, and/or audience is relevant to an argument. • Demonstrate a complex understanding of a historical development related to the prompt through sophisticated argumentation and/or effective use of evidence.

0 / 12,000 characters

Checking scoring…

Scoring it yourself shows you the rubric, examples and a model answer. Try writing your answer first.